evesgrden
Posts: 597
Joined: 6/9/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
What I accept but clearly many here can't is, if a woman touts/entices/encourages a person on the internet or otherwise, for money by portraying herself to be a dominant and if that dominant woman shows provocative pictures, or speaks in a way that she knows will excite him, then she is deemed by a good margin of people as offering a sexual service. She doesn't need to feel turned on, she doesn't need to touch his genitals, she doesn't need to meet him in the flesh even. She is offering wank fodder that in most cases would not exist if money or gifts were not involved. Some people will see any sort of sexual service as prostitution and some won't. These people, mainly male subs that are using the word 'prostitute' are well aware there is no sex. Regardless of that they still believe its prostitution. Nail. Head. Bang. Jimmy Swaggart lost everything (for a while) because he paid a prostitute to masturbate in front of him. He didn't touch her. Was she working? Yes. Was he paying a prostitute for her services? Yes. Was it criminal? Dunno... that's up to the courts. There are men who pay prostitutes for their time and just talk. No contact. Was the prostitute working? Yes. As a prostitute? Yes. Was it criminal? Dunno. That's up to the courts. I don't think so. If she was not in the sex business he would not have sought her out just as Swaggart would not have sought out the women he paid. There was no fucking no sucking no hand jobs. I see two types of findommes with some overlap. There are those who provide kink-related titillation online in exchange for material reward/compensation, and some of them also have authority over the subissive's finances and get a cut for doing that. Some investment brokers work that way; they get a piece of the pie for investingLike an agent or bookie. Some findommes get a piece of the pie for being the authority on how the submissive spends their money. Then there are dominants who have various amounts of control. Some of them also have oversight over the finances, but they don't expect their submissives to pay them for being in charge of the monies or for arousal-related behaviors. For some reason, I seem to think of pro-dommes as those who relate in person, and are very clear about what they charge for what, and findommes as those whose work is done largely online. I don't know why.. that just happens to be my take on it.
_____________________________
What you permit, you promote.
|