Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is illegal to freely play music in The United States.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is illegal to freely play music in The United States. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 1:49:28 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
And so you want to put the integrity test back onto businesses with no integrity?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 1:53:21 AM   
ThatDaveGuy69


Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
At the risk of fattening the troll...

RealOne: I still don't get what point you are trying to make.
OK, so as part of the filings in any court case, the State will refer to its jurisdiction over the matter. It's all that ledalese with the )'s at the begining of the document. And yes, there is often conflicting jurisdictions when crimes are committed that fall under both state and federal authority. So what?

But back to your various statements: There is no need for you to prove anything about jurisdiction. The only time it is an issue is when there are conflicts between parts of the Government. So again, I don't understand why you think you need to prove jurisdiction except as a way to evade responsibility. If you, as a business owner get busted for not having an inspection sticker or a liquor license, do you really think you can stand before a judge and claim the town/county/whatever doesn't have jurisdiction? You'll be laughed right out of court and probably have additional fines added. And yes, I've been in court a few times over the years and on both side. Although to be honest I suspect you've been there a lot more than I have. Fine by me.

There is only one governing body, commonly referred to as The Government, be it local, county, state, or federal. There is no "competitive agency" that handles building inspections, traffic violations, or any of other type of law enforcement. The Free Market cannot ever be THAT free. If, in your little fantasy world, there were 4 or 5 different companies that could inspect a nightclub/bar/whatever to see that it met certain safety standards, there are immediately two problems: 1) Who sets those safety standards; 2) Who certifies the companies that do the inspections? If you answer the State Fire Marshall or State Building Inspector then you have just lost the game. Further, there would be nothing to stop a business from printing his own sign saying the location has been inspected and is safe. Who would argue with it? If you want to see the act that is performing you probably will not stop to verify the inspection notice. OK, YOU might, but most people would not.

So again I ask, what is the point you are trying to make here? Are you angry that only the State can inspect and license an establishment? Isn't that one of the reasons we institute governments in the 1st place? To establish certain standards of behavior (laws) that are enforcable. Remember that whole "to provide for the common defence, insure domestic tranquility" etc...?

You can certainly make the case that many laws are overreaching and that in many cases Government is overly intrussive. But do you really want to attend a concert in a building that has NOT passed a basic inspection? Do you want to buy/rent/live in a house that does not meet the local building code? Do you want to share the road with cars that do not have a certain minimum level of safety? Do you want to eat food that was processed in whatever manner a company sees fit? Do you not care that the water you drink, regardless of its source, is safe? While the list of regulations seems endless, would you prefer to throw them all away and let the almighty Market decide? We've seen that model and it does not work.

So once again I ask: What is your point? No more baseball metaphors - just answer the question.






_____________________________

He said I'd blown a seal. I said fix the damn thing and leave my private life out of this!
What happens in the event horizon STAYS in the Event Horizon!
I have zero tolerance for Zero Tolerance

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 2:03:45 AM   
metamorfosis


Posts: 1132
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69
At the risk of fattening the troll...


You are the troll.



< Message edited by metamorfosis -- 7/29/2013 2:04:01 AM >


_____________________________

Pam (aka gungadin09)

Forum Freak

(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 6:46:51 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
If I stand in my yard- and read-ish/sing this thread- and I live next to a park which I do- (across the street) and people hear my singing- do I need TSA permission??

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 7:07:46 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Here ya go, pahunk

http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/faq/4727

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 11:28:41 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

hear my singing- do I need TSA permission??


Never know, you might need EPA permission.

T^T

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/29/2013 11:36:49 PM   
Esinn


Posts: 886
Joined: 6/23/2009
Status: offline
Can I say fuck? My only question is what the fuck does this have to do with DHS? This is not even an issue where FLEA needs involved. As clearly stated this is a "Local"/state issue. LE..... I live in Brownsburg Indiana, I promise and can submit photographs as evidence. There is no LE shortage.

_____________________________

Let's break the law

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/30/2013 4:58:51 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69

At the risk of fattening the troll...

RealOne: I still don't get what point you are trying to make.
OK, so as part of the filings in any court case, the State will refer to its jurisdiction over the matter. It's all that ledalese with the )'s at the begining of the document. And yes, there is often conflicting jurisdictions when crimes are committed that fall under both state and federal authority. So what?

Wrong, the state will make a claim, and wrong again, that is only the heading and title, names etc, of the court the ppw is filed in nothing more.

That like what 3 or 4 strikes for you so far? LOL


But back to your various statements: There is no need for you to prove anything about jurisdiction. The only time it is an issue is when there are conflicts between parts of the Government.

Wrong again! steerike 5

So again, I don't understand

true

why you think you need to prove jurisdiction except as a way to evade responsibility.

Ok I seen enough, PLONK this is a waste.


If you, as a business owner get busted for not having an inspection sticker or a liquor license, do you really think you can stand before a judge and claim the town/county/whatever doesn't have jurisdiction? You'll be laughed right out of court and probably have additional fines added. And yes, I've been in court a few times over the years and on both side. Although to be honest I suspect you've been there a lot more than I have. Fine by me.

There is only one governing body, commonly referred to as The Government, be it local, county, state, or federal. There is no "competitive agency" that handles building inspections, traffic violations, or any of other type of law enforcement. The Free Market cannot ever be THAT free. If, in your little fantasy world, there were 4 or 5 different companies that could inspect a nightclub/bar/whatever to see that it met certain safety standards, there are immediately two problems: 1) Who sets those safety standards; 2) Who certifies the companies that do the inspections? If you answer the State Fire Marshall or State Building Inspector then you have just lost the game. Further, there would be nothing to stop a business from printing his own sign saying the location has been inspected and is safe. Who would argue with it? If you want to see the act that is performing you probably will not stop to verify the inspection notice. OK, YOU might, but most people would not.

So again I ask, what is the point you are trying to make here? Are you angry that only the State can inspect and license an establishment? Isn't that one of the reasons we institute governments in the 1st place? To establish certain standards of behavior (laws) that are enforcable. Remember that whole "to provide for the common defence, insure domestic tranquility" etc...?

You can certainly make the case that many laws are overreaching and that in many cases Government is overly intrussive. But do you really want to attend a concert in a building that has NOT passed a basic inspection? Do you want to buy/rent/live in a house that does not meet the local building code? Do you want to share the road with cars that do not have a certain minimum level of safety? Do you want to eat food that was processed in whatever manner a company sees fit? Do you not care that the water you drink, regardless of its source, is safe? While the list of regulations seems endless, would you prefer to throw them all away and let the almighty Market decide? We've seen that model and it does not work.

So once again I ask: What is your point? No more baseball metaphors - just answer the question.








_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/31/2013 2:37:34 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

If I stand in my yard- and read-ish/sing this thread- and I live next to a park which I do- (across the street) and people hear my singing- do I need TSA permission??


Not sure what the TSA has to do with it, but if you and your band are performing a concert in your yard at 9pm, you probably would need to get the local government to give you an exemption to the noise ordinance.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is ille... - 7/31/2013 2:38:44 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Esinn

Can I say fuck? My only question is what the fuck does this have to do with DHS? This is not even an issue where FLEA needs involved. As clearly stated this is a "Local"/state issue. LE..... I live in Brownsburg Indiana, I promise and can submit photographs as evidence. There is no LE shortage.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but from looking into this case, it appears that state cops in IN are part of the state "DHS", along with the fire marshall etc.

(in reply to Esinn)
Profile   Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Department of Homeland Security says it is illegal to freely play music in The United States. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125