Dom480
Posts: 2
Joined: 6/15/2011 Status: offline
|
Financial motivations aren't limited to fin-dommes. Amazon wishlists and such have been creeping into profiles of young submissive women over the last year or so as well. It's not very common, yet. I've been here a couple of years. This is my first forum post. I don't participate in forums anywhere, on any topic, partly because I don't care to and partly because I don't often have time to spend this way. I pop over here now and then when a headline catches my eye on the other side and on rare occasions just to browse. I appreciate the intent of those who post here out of a sense of community and knowledge sharing. Given my limited time in this forum, my perspective is that of an outsider and I make no claim to any expertise on the quality or trends of the forum content. The impression I've gained over a couple years infrequently reading here is that "go to a munch" is the rubber-stamp answer to a couple of types of threads and it's almost always offered by the same rubber-stampers. Two general categories many of those threads fall into are "Hey, I'm new. Any tips?" and "WTF why won't those bitches talk to me?". The latter of which is often phrased as something about fakes. For the first type, I've always felt the "go to a munch" answer was okay advice. It was, in my opinion, often pushed harder than it needed to be and often with a tone suggesting it's the only respectable option. For that reason, to some extent I agree with seekingreality's be-all-and-end-all comment earlier in this thread. For the second type, I initially thought the "go to a munch" answer was a cop out. It looked to me as though active long-timers were intentionally ignoring the problems with the other half of this site, excusing it. I later came to realize most who are active on this side don't spend much time on that side. So I'm willing to chalk it up to blissful ignorance. I know the fakes topic is old news around here. I'm not trying to turn this conversation into that one. Bear with me for a few paragraphs as this isn't whining or bitching but a logical analysis and I do have a point that ties back to the fin-domme topic. For those of you who still don't want to hear it, I'll visually mark that part of my post so you can skip it. >>>> BEGIN FAKES ANALYSIS It used to be most the fakes were real people playing games. There were occasional profiles where the [insert whatever type of foreigner you like] couldn't figure out the difference between kg and lbs and Google translate didn't do a very good job on their text. Those and some other types were obvious and they weren't the majority. Many months ago I read on collarmefakes.com that a mod here admitted CM generates bogus profiles just to keep the stats up, in competition with Fet. To keep dominant males coming back would be another good reason for CM to do this. I don't believe everything I read on the internet. I don't automatically disbelieve it either. In the last few months I've noticed two specific things supporting that idea. The Criteria First, in the Newest Local Users view, the tooltips when you hover over a profile image display both the date/time the person joined and the date/time they were last online, to the minute. I haven't looked for them but I haven't noticed those details, to the minute, in other views. What I noticed is the profiles are very often created and last online in the same minute or one minute apart. This would mean several humans created profiles, entered a paragraph or two of text, posted a picture and selected some interests (bird watching usually a favorite -- America's favorite pastime, apparently) and immediately logged off, all within 0-119 seconds. Unlikely. So either people outside CM have broken the captcha (not impossible) and are generating fake profiles, or CM is doing it. Second, in the last few months there have been days where there's a barrage of new profiles, all of attractive young submissives with a single photo safe enough for Facebook and a paragraph of really generic profile text making no reference to anything BDSM. Each of these profiles has a random background color but always the default font and black text. The profiles are spread across the US geographically. These are in addition to obvious fakes you see over and over again... "This is humiliating for me..." followed by some crap about her rich parents and spoiled lifestyle. Or my favorite, the one that lists a bunch of bdsm activities and measurements including her "moderate [random size] breasts". Also, those of us in the US always feel the need to point out our state is in the USA. And for a town with 886 households, Bee Branch, Arkansas is almost entirely hot, young subs if you count the profiles here. I really need to move there! The Experiment Two weeks ago I began an experiment. Any time I see a profile that fits any of these criteria, I hide it. I use Google image search on every remaining new profile within my filter (18-45 female sub in the US, willing to relocate) and the majority have matches on free porn sites, Russian bride sites, romance scam warning sites and similar. I hide each of those. I even went through several hundred profiles sorted by last online more or less mindlessly in the background while on the phone one night. Due to my personal tastes, I also hid very large women and African American women but these were a very low percentage compared to the others. Due to their tastes, I also hid lesbians. The Result You know what's left after hiding all of those? Between 1 and 3 profiles per day that I couldn't immediately discard as fake. This doesn't mean they're real. It just means I couldn't immediately prove (by criteria acceptable to me) they're fake. Let's assume they're real. How many of those women never log in again after the first 100 abusive and often really twisted emails? Most of the women I met here with whom I still maintain friendships didn't stay here longer than a couple of months, if that. >>>> END FAKES ANALYSIS My Point It's been suggested the fin-domme populace has grown large and vocal enough to taint CollarChat. I'd suggest CM doesn't have much other human female populace so the fin-domme populace is a larger percentage of the general populace than it appears. If CM got rid of the fin-dommes, there would be almost no real female profiles and eventually guys would stop showing up and ad revenue would dry up. I think it's heading that way anyway. The other side of the site has lost nearly all of it's value for me. What I'm reading here seems to indicate active long-timers on the CollarChat side of the site feel its value is also declining. Looking back, I've met just as many women with compatible interests on OKCupid and PlentyOfFish in the last two-three years as I met here. I suspect it won't be long before I stop frequenting this site. Fet is an option, though they intentionally make it a pain to seek out people to meet and I find the fact that everyone has 36 different types of relationships with 12 different people ridiculous. As a web developer, it's tempting to create a competing site. I really don't have time to dedicate to that.
< Message edited by Dom480 -- 8/2/2013 4:14:35 AM >
|