evesgrden -> RE: How Do I get my wife to agree???? (8/15/2013 5:53:35 AM)
|
quote:
He's been on this site for 10 years = he's had experience? Laughable. No. I didn't draw any causal links. I merely referred to information from his post and from his profile. He said he's had experience. Not much, but I'll take back what I said if his wife knew about about his "experience". quote:
As for defending the author of the other post, yes, she did ask her husband. This guy was asking "how can I get my wife on board." Pretty damn similar neh? It is similar. But the OP was slammed for the deceit and his profile where he was looking for squeeze on the side. As for talking to his wife, after 10 years of trying to get some on the side, he now wants to ask her permission to get some on the side, but won't even consider getting her on board in the lifestyle. I'll say it again, for me it's the deceit that's a problem. If you truly believe that those are comparable situations then we'll have to agree to disagree. quote:
I also demonstrated statistically that I was correct and showed my methodology. Can't agree to disagree here I'm afraid. You're wrong nine ways to Sunday because you know nothing about stats and methodology. You know nothing about sampling. You can't draw any conclusions without first having some idea of the population. You didn't sample results by gender, you didn't make sure that they were seperate authors, you presume the posts in a row or chronologically recent is representative.. You're out of your league here. let me help you. You think that women are harder on male cheaters than female cheaters. Is that correct? If so, find posts where women said they were cheating, and look at the responses by men, and by women. (and not the same posters over and over again.. if responding 6 times, I'm still only 1 woman.. this is where population and data sampling come into play and we can't go there on this site). Then find posts where men said they were cheating, and look at the reponses by men, and by women. You're looking for gender differences in the way posters respond. You may be right but you certainly haven't said anything remotely compelling. At best what you could do here is make an observation based on your searches, and ask a question based on your anecdotal observations. Besides, it's just data. Don't know why you need to go to the mockery zone. Trust me, I can live with the burden of you being right, not lose any sleep, and have my self-worth intact. But if that's how you want to handle a debate, count me out. Prove me wrong.. I love it. I'm particularly in awe if/when that happens to a long held belief. Will I misspeak or make errors in logic.. yep, just ask Ishtar, she's caught'em plenty. Mock me for it? Well, that just means we're done because clearly you're more vested in being right or top dog than substance. For me, being wrong is just part and parcel of the human condition.. happens routinely in my world. I'm good with that.
|
|
|
|