Raiikun
Posts: 2650
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD A SYG was not granted so it is not an SYG case B Zimmerman didn't claim SYG so neither was it. C All they have in common is that neither is a SYG case. D SYG never applies when the other guy is LE A Zimmermans lawyers were considering SYG B So why did many on here claim he had the right to kill Martin under SYG C All they had in common was some dude with a gun playing cop D Tell me something I dont know. A Considered doesn't count B Doesn't matter what many on here claimed it was legitimate under standard self defense C No in one case it was a true vigilante, in the other a citizen doing his duty. D You don't seem to know that this takes SYG out of the conversation. More importantly, 776.032 provides for immunity from prosecution for any act of self defense, including self defense covered by traditional, pre-SYG laws. Which is why O'Mara for some time insisted that even though colloquially Florida called it a "Stand Your Ground" hearing, that it was inaccurate, as the facts of the case had nothing to do with SYG. That hearing may still happen too. If any lawsuit gets filed against George in the next half a year, they'll motion for an immunity hearing per 776.032, and it still won't be a "SYG" hearing.
|