DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun In the perjury PCA, the State wrote: Q: And you mentioned also, in terms of the ability of your husband to make a bond amount, that you all had no money, is that correct? A: To my knowledge, that is correct. Q: Were you aware of the website that Mr. Zimmerman or somebody on his behalf created? A: I’m aware of that website. Q: How much money is in that website right now? How much money as a result of that website was— A: Currently, I do not know. Q: Do you have any estimate as to how much money has already been obtained or collected? A: I do not. The two bolded statements are lies as the tapes of her conversations with her husband proved. That's why bond was revoked and she was charged with perjury and that is why she pled guilty. She was guilty and she knew it. No, the tapes proved no such thing. Sure, that's why the judge revoked the bond and she was charged with perjury. The judge had it in for her. She committed perjury and they let her plead to misdemeanor perjury because they were being nice to her. They had her and everyone knew it. She's still looking at losing her nursing license so it wasn't to save that.
|