Zonie63 -> RE: What do you see as a "men's" issue? (9/17/2013 6:25:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Me, I learned some while ago to try to avoid the laziness, ignorance and downright nastiness that goes with misusing such terms. Ironically, that came up in college, and in respect of some nutter who kept referring to conservatives as 'fascists'. You allow that, you eventually allow all debate to turn into just an ugly mess of lots of pointless dung-slinging of propaganda from one side to the other. That still happens to a large degree, though. When I was in college, "liberal" was very often equated with "communist," so associating "conservative" with "fascist" might have seemed to be a retaliatory tactic. Such mudslinging still goes on today, so nothing ever really changes. I can't really quite gauge how the term "feminist" has been perceived or associated. Back in the 60s, it would have been considered part of the counter-culture, associated with hippies, liberals, progressives, socialists - the kind of people who would wind up on Nixon's enemies list. Nowadays, feminism seems more or less "mainstream," at least as far as its general politics might go. Feminists have moved up in the areas of business, law, and politics, yet all they really want is an equal seat at the big table, while fully embracing the system and the corporate establishment. So, it might seem as if that nothing else would really change, even if feminism achieved its primary goals of gender equality. We might even get a woman president someday. What if the 2016 President election was between Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin? They're still part of the same political machine; just because they're women doesn't mean anything.
|
|
|
|