CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
I don't know...maybe posting this just before a holiday weekend is not the best way to get a fair representative group of answers but I'm going to give it a shot anyway. The idea came to me after reading several thread regarding courtesy, respect, saying no to your dominant, speaking with a submissive friend, etc. I've been involved in D/s/BDSM for about 9 years now. When I was getting started, there seemed to be much more evidence of courteous attitudes towards others. Yeah, there were jerks...there always seems to be in any group...but there seemed to be many more who were friendly, helpful, and courteous. As I noted on the courtesy thread, having been raised this way myself and somewhat disheartened by what I saw as a coarsening in the world at large, this was refreshing. What is puzzling is that, in my observations anyway, there seems to be a rise in D/s of a certain mindset: On one hand, you have submissives who are friendly and courteous and who believe that it is best to use a courteous approach when dealing with other dominants and a respectful approach when dealing with their own. Their relationship with their dominant may include banter and/or the right to express their own opinion and/or the right to argue but it is all approached in a manner that shows respect for their partner and for their dominant. On the other hand, you have the type of submissive who seems to feel, if appearances are to be believed, that courtesy is for "old folks" or for when they really want something. They feel that while they may submit to their dominant, they are under no obligation to always be respectful or courteous to him. Especially when it comes to a subject broached with which they totally disagree. As for other dominants/submissives...what they are makes no difference, even once their story is known...as far as this submissive is concerned, they are not much different than the vanilla people she interacts with every day and therefore, receive no more courtesy and no more respect. This type of submissive seems to take a special joy in proclaiming their independence and in noting that, while they are submissive, they "won't be pushed around". Now, as to my question. For many submissives in the second group, those submissives in the first group are "dumb doormats" or "desperate". For many submissives in the first group, those in the second group are "sham submissives" or "closet manhaters" How does anyone from either group know this for certain? Or are they just going by perception? It seems to me that the only one(s) who would know for sure are those who are involved with those from the groups. What do you think? When you meet a courteous submissive, do you automatically assume that here is a submissive who is a doormat? When you meet a submissive who appears to have little in the way of manners/respect, do you automatically assume that they aren't really submissive or are just playing at it? CAVEAT: I am not stating that one group is better than the other...let's make that clear. I purposely hold off stating my own opinion on this at first so as to get discussion going about the questions asked.
|