Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Male Superiority?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Male Superiority? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 2:28:41 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline 		FR: I'm totally with red on this one, my submission is hot-wired into my sexuality. Despite being dominant in personality, I am highly sexually submissive (not that unusual).

I never call Himself Master -- except during certain intimate moments.

Although my submission has filtered out far beyond the bedroom, the foundation is based on the sexual chemistry between us. I would not have a clue how to separate it. A huge part of this is that he's a great lover, and in my mind males that are great lovers are in touch with their feminine side. I think you have to be to know how women respond sexually.

_____________________________



(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 3:28:05 PM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

Yes, male being superiors to worthless slabs of meaningless flesh with absolutely no redeeming qualities is the "natural order" and the way the world should be. If all women were trained from birth in the art of pleasing and worshiping their male superiors than we could create heaven on earth, as women were designed to be sexually, physically, emotionally, and mentally submissive to men. And I plan on creating the natural order on earth. That way a man will never have to worry again. A man will truly be happy and know they will have a virgin sex slave at whatever age he chooses delivered to him upon him turning into a man. And girls will truly be happy in their servitude of their male superiors. A man shouldn't have to woo a woman. He's a man. If he can overpower a girl, then it his right by nature to have his way with her. And girls don't know what they want by programming. God designed them that way so they can finally experience the truest and most beloved joy in their life when they're finally stripped of their dignity, and taught their place on their hands and knees serving us. :) Trust me, I designed you ladies that way.

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."



(in reply to Daddy133)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 3:39:55 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."


I know some people found this to be amusing; I didn't.
I found it sad: what better example to show you have no control over someone is there than you have to whip someone to teach them how to behave.

[My] Master inspires me to be obedient and my behaving well is something He doesn't have to generally worry about.

But if whipping is all you've got?
That is sad.

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to Daddy133)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 3:58:08 PM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline 		No, not amusing. Delusional.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 6:21:09 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Same here. His posts show a fundamental lack of understanding of the BDSM D/s community. Or even how to behave like something more than a horny 13 year old.

You should apologize to horny 13 year olds for that unwarranted association.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 6:58:55 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		Already discussed.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 7:46:46 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Same here. His posts show a fundamental lack of understanding of the BDSM D/s community. Or even how to behave like something more than a horny 13 year old.

You should apologize to horny 13 year olds for that unwarranted association.


True. How about MMORPG players living in Mom's basement?


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 8:17:57 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

Yes, male being superiors to worthless slabs of meaningless flesh with absolutely no redeeming qualities is the "natural order" and the way the world should be. If all women were trained from birth in the art of pleasing and worshiping their male superiors than we could create heaven on earth, as women were designed to be sexually, physically, emotionally, and mentally submissive to men. And I plan on creating the natural order on earth. That way a man will never have to worry again. A man will truly be happy and know they will have a virgin sex slave at whatever age he chooses delivered to him upon him turning into a man. And girls will truly be happy in their servitude of their male superiors. A man shouldn't have to woo a woman. He's a man. If he can overpower a girl, then it his right by nature to have his way with her. And girls don't know what they want by programming. God designed them that way so they can finally experience the truest and most beloved joy in their life when they're finally stripped of their dignity, and taught their place on their hands and knees serving us. :) Trust me, I designed you ladies that way.

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."

I think you read too much John Norman dude. Good luck!
By the way, why block this guy? I didn't know free speech isn't allowed. Everybody has their own interpretation of this subject. This is his and it's honest. There are men like this one out there. Facts of life, and possibly subs/slaves who "might" be drawn and attracted to his *eyes roll* "male superiority complex".


(in reply to Daddy133)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 8:21:39 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline 		Things that involve physical strength, generally men are better than women. Like there are barely any female fire fighters as they may have difficulty hauling a big man out of the fire.

But good thing physical strength is not required in D/S, thus there is no superiority, both are each other equal ying and yang and can't do without each other to enjoy what they enjoy.

(in reply to SlipSlidingAway)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/21/2013 11:01:37 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline 		Things that involve commanding without emotional bias is what men are stronger at. Physical strength supports the already strong male confidence and Doms must be confident and therefore men are superior and strength is therefore required for a superior Dom in a Ds relationship..

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 7:06:46 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline 		Not all men are confident, lacking emotional decision making, physically stronger than women or make sweeping generalizations.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 7:31:07 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		Three issues here.

1. Comparing men and women is difficult because we people tend to think in terms of individuals. To properly compare characteristics such as height, weight, general temperament, etc., we need to be aware of distributions of populations and subpopulations. And that ain't easy. Saying things like "men are taller than women" really means "The mean height of men is greater than the mean height of women." Most people simply do not think in this manner.

2. A lot of the differences between genders, is based on highly subjective opinions as well as anecdotal evidence. For example, my own ideas are that women tend to be more empathetic, relate more to people's feelings and less to goal-oriented achievements, more relationship-minded, etc. Their activities tend to be more "house-y" and less sports-oriented. They do home repairs less, and have a better sense of interior design. Other people, especially those from other cultures, might have different ideas.

3. The concept of superiority implies a value judgment. If a man's method of project management got the job done more quickly and better quality than a woman's way, but the woman's way produced a happier workforce and less dysfunction, which is better? The criteria used in the value judgment itself introduces bias.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 8:42:47 AM   
myotherself


Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: The cold bit of the UK
Status: offline 		I command without emotional bias every day - it's my job. I do my job at least as well as my male colleagues and better than most. I am very confident in my ability to lead and I don't need physical strength to back it up.

So that makes me a very confident woman with good leadership skills. And yet I'm a slave to my Master. He's not my superior, he's the one that we have both chosen to lead the relationship. We have our roles, and neither role is superior or inferior to the other - they are complementary and mutually supportive.


_____________________________

There's nowt so queer as folk


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 9:27:13 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline 		Dom and sub are indeed complimentary in role and relationship. This does not mean the female submissive seeks her equal in a Dom. The leader might be equal to the led in a vanilla relationship but in a Ds relationship it is not one of leader and follower but of one in total command and the one who submits to his will. They are complementary but not equal. The one in command is indeed a leader but not only that in a Ds relationship. This is not a generalization but perhaps does have a few exceptions, nonetheless, in most any female submissive's profile I cannot help but notice she is not seeking her equal and if she says she does then she submits to her equal and of course that does not last long. No, not long.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to myotherself)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 9:43:22 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

I think you have to be to know how women respond sexually.


A great Dom must know how women respond sexually but this means he is (well and generally) experienced as a male and not in touch with anything except his ability to cause women to respond on a sexual level and as a Dom also well knowing how she responds mentally and emotionally and physically outside of the sexual arena.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 9:57:24 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline 		That post made by that user has nothing to do with John Norman.

Maybe those that live in online venues may have those views, but that would be only the one's with no clue.

Let that guy own his post without attributing it to things other than himself.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think you read too much John Norman dude. Good luck!
By the way, why block this guy? I didn't know free speech isn't allowed. Everybody has their own interpretation of this subject. This is his and it's honest. There are men like this one out there. Facts of life, and possibly subs/slaves who "might" be drawn and attracted to his *eyes roll* "male superiority complex".





_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 10:25:47 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I didn't know free speech isn't allowed.



It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

If he is not abiding by the rules that he agreed to when he became a member, they have every right to block him.

http://cnreviews.com/life/society-culture/internet-freedom-of-speech-not-guaranteed_20090426.html

http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2009/09/free-speech-in-online-communities-the-delusion-of-entitlement/

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 11:08:13 AM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

If he is not abiding by the rules that he agreed to when he became a member, they have every right to block him.

http://cnreviews.com/life/society-culture/internet-freedom-of-speech-not-guaranteed_20090426.html

http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2009/09/free-speech-in-online-communities-the-delusion-of-entitlement/


Oh... now you've done it. I expect to see the, "But that is censorship! And I hate censorship!" crowd in ...3 ...2 ...1


_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 10:12:19 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
That post made by that user has nothing to do with John Norman.


It sounds very John Norman - ish. The idea that women are born to want to serve man and be beneath them. And I interprete the fact that he has stories about capturing independent women who believes in their equality to men from earth to convert them into sexual slaves and loving their position as one, is to prove this point.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 10:17:13 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

Except, I personally do not see his point of view about male superiority is breaking any of this forum rules, except it is not a popular view. His response was inline with the topic of this thread. Everyone says no to the question. He says Yes.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Male Superiority? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078