RE: Male Superiority?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Male Superiority?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Male Superiority?

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 10:19:34 PM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Things that involve commanding without emotional bias is what men are stronger at.

Lol!! I honestly have met so many men way more emotionally driven than women when they make decisions.
I think alot of men have trouble handling overwhelming emotions choking them, as compared to females, we are used to handling it.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 9/22/2013 10:20:26 PM >

(in reply to Arturas)

Profile

Post #: 101

RE: Male Superiority? - 9/22/2013 10:54:24 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

Then take it to the Gorean section. Your selective reading can be pointed out as well as how a warrior society putting emphasis on strength and aggression does not compare well to an agrarian society on a sociological level. Many things can be discussed there but it would be in the proper section for speaking about John Norman's series and how it relates to living life.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
That post made by that user has nothing to do with John Norman.

It sounds very John Norman - ish. The idea that women are born to want to serve man and be beneath them. And I interprete the fact that he has stories about capturing independent women who believes in their equality to men from earth to convert them into sexual slaves and loving their position as one, is to prove this point.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 102

RE: Male Superiority? - 9/23/2013 7:48:54 AM

OsideGirl

Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

Except, I personally do not see his point of view about male superiority is breaking any of this forum rules, except it is not a popular view. His response was inline with the topic of this thread. Everyone says no to the question. He says Yes.

His male superiority post (as vile as it is) was allowed to stand. So, I don't understand why you feel that his view has been removed.

We can't actually see the other posts that were pulled, so you have no idea about whether he has broken rules or not, or even if they were about male superiority. (If his posts are like his emails, I have a good idea, though)

Since he's on moderation......I'm going to go with....broke the rules.

< Message edited by OsideGirl -- 9/23/2013 8:35:02 AM >

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 103

RE: Male Superiority? - 9/23/2013 10:04:35 AM

VideoAdminChi

Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline

quote:

By the way, why block this guy? I didn't know free speech isn't allowed.

We can't comment on action taken against specific posters, but in general, posters become moderated (Awaiting Approval), if they have been repeatedly warned not to engage in certain behavior yet persist in doing so, or, rarely, have a post of two that is so egregious that common sense dictates that moderation is required.

We review posts [Awaiting Approval] periodically and approve the ones that do not violate the Terms of Service or Collarme.com Forum Guidelines.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 104