Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Teaching Our Children


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Teaching Our Children Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 8:23:44 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

According to reports, some educators are making use of textbooks that feature rather curious "facts".

As a program of the Virginia Department of Education, Virtual Virginia (VVa) offers online Advanced Placement (AP®), world language, core academic, and elective courses to students across the Commonwealth and nation. Virtual Virginia is committed to providing high-quality, rigorous course content with the flexibility to meet schools’ and students’ varied schedules. Our program strives to provide instruction that meets the individual needs of students. ~Virtual Virginia

For Advanced Placement in History two course texts are listed, one of which is this one from Amsco School Publications:

United States History—Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination

On page 102, the text summarizes the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

K.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kirata -- 9/18/2013 8:30:01 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 8:32:56 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
Are you pointing out the exclusion of "a well-regulated militia"?

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 8:53:39 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
Are you pointing out the exclusion of "a well-regulated militia"?


The 2nd Amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

That is not the same as stating that "the people have a right to keep and bear arms in a state militia."

The latter allows firearms solely to the use in a state militia, and in activities that support that (ie. firearms training and practice). If that interpretation was true, there would be no allowance for firearms for sporting purposes, self-defense, hunting (for food and defense, as opposed to sport-hunting), etc.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 9:04:04 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
I discounted the older prose because none of the others in the textbook are written that way either.

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 9:16:15 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
I discounted the older prose because none of the others in the textbook are written that way either.


The prose isn't the issue. It's the interpretation that is the problem. Paraphrasing the Amendment without changing the meaning is fine, as was done in for the First, Third and Fourth (I didn't go further, so this is not to imply there was anything negative done to any amendment that beyond those).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 9:21:36 AM   
FelineRanger


Posts: 658
Joined: 9/4/2012
Status: offline
Actually, DesideriScuri quoted the Second Amendment as it's written in the Bill of Rights, not merely some "older translation."

_____________________________

Bill

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 9:39:32 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination








Attachment (1)

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 9:47:31 AM   
slavekate80


Posts: 362
Joined: 7/4/2013
Status: offline
It may have been unintentional. Still inaccurate and hardly high quality. Separation of church and state isn't specifically part of the Bill of Rights, either, though some degree of it is implied. The third amendment not only prohibits forced quarter of soldiers in peacetime, but also restricts it in times of war. This looks like sloppy summarizing and too much simplification for a high school AP class meant to count as college credit. I'm assuming that the students who would take the class are teenagers, and above average. They can handle the original text.

(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 10:30:15 AM   
metamorfosis


Posts: 1132
Status: offline
quote:

The prose isn't the issue. It's the interpretation that is the problem. Paraphrasing the Amendment without changing the meaning is fine, as was done in for the First, Third and Fourth (I didn't go further, so this is not to imply there was anything negative done to any amendment that beyond those).


Absolutely.


< Message edited by metamorfosis -- 9/18/2013 10:31:07 AM >


_____________________________

Pam (aka gungadin09)

Forum Freak

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 10:36:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
According to no credible reports that have been evidenced here, there is nothing credible that leads me to believe that bit of asswipe in the OP, and nothing to believe that is a real book. And the according to some is a felch right off of Faux Nuze for a way to inflame the feeble-minded which turns out not to be true in the least upon the most superficial examination.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to metamorfosis)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 10:50:55 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
I smelled a hoax myself, but there's a .pdf of the book online at

http://www.conejo.k12.ca.us/Portals/49/Departments/Social%20Science/Palotay/Amsco.pdf

That wording of the 2nd Amendment is on p 134.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 9/18/2013 10:51:27 AM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:03:09 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I smelled a hoax myself, but there's a .pdf of the book online at

http://www.conejo.k12.ca.us/Portals/49/Departments/Social%20Science/Palotay/Amsco.pdf

That wording of the 2nd Amendment is on p 134.

Also worth noting, conejo.k12.ca.us is the Conejo Valley Unified School District in Thousand Oaks, California.

K.




< Message edited by Kirata -- 9/18/2013 11:10:14 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:07:00 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I smelled a hoax myself, but there's a .pdf of the book online at

http://www.conejo.k12.ca.us/Portals/49/Departments/Social%20Science/Palotay/Amsco.pdf

That wording of the 2nd Amendment is on p 134.



Your link is to the 2010 revision and the wording is on book P.102 and is exactly as K posted -

Second Amendment. The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:12:01 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
FR
There was a text book I read about years ago that had "(Police and Military)" after the second amendment.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:19:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I smelled a hoax myself, but there's a .pdf of the book online at

http://www.conejo.k12.ca.us/Portals/49/Departments/Social%20Science/Palotay/Amsco.pdf

That wording of the 2nd Amendment is on p 134.

Also worth noting, conejo.k12.ca.us is the Conejo Valley Unified School District in Thousand Oaks, California.

K.




Rabbit valley, Still there is no causal link between the three cites in the OP.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:21:13 AM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
From page 134:

Here is a summary of the rights guaranteed in each amendment

It is a summary, not an exhaustive verbatim quotation from the Bill of Rights.

My guess is that it is an encapsulation of the essential bits of the individual items that the student of History should already know. Therefore it serves as reference only and not an exact representation.

While I do not agree that this is the way to go with education, this is a test preparation book, not a textbook for the purposes of education.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:26:21 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge
From page 134:
Here is a summary of the rights guaranteed in each amendment
It is a summary, not an exhaustive verbatim quotation from the Bill of Rights.
My guess is that it is an encapsulation of the essential bits of the individual items that the student of History should already know. Therefore it serves as reference only and not an exact representation.
While I do not agree that this is the way to go with education, this is a test preparation book, not a textbook for the purposes of education.


Shouldn't a summary summarize the actual meaning?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:26:32 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

My guess is that it is an encapsulation of the essential bits...

Given such a blatant misrepresentation of fact, the question is: Essential to what?

K.







< Message edited by Kirata -- 9/18/2013 11:40:09 AM >

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:27:00 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

From page 134:

Here is a summary of the rights guaranteed in each amendment

It is a summary, not an exhaustive verbatim quotation from the Bill of Rights.

My guess is that it is an encapsulation of the essential bits of the individual items that the student of History should already know. Therefore it serves as reference only and not an exact representation.

While I do not agree that this is the way to go with education, this is a test preparation book, not a textbook for the purposes of education.

However it is a misrepresentation of the 2nd.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Teaching Our Children - 9/18/2013 11:54:51 AM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri


Shouldn't a summary summarize the actual meaning?



Isn't this splitting hairs a little bit? If you hit the highlights of something and lose a bit of the original meaning, is that not what a summary is?

I am not certain what the problem that people are having with the understanding of a condensed version serving to bring to mind the very basic essence of something that a student should already know. For instance, ROY G. BIV is a condensing of the order of the colors in the rainbow. Now, if they only taught ROY G. BIV to children and left out the essential meaning of it, then I can see your point, but obviously they do not.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Given such a blatant misrepresentation of fact, the question is: Essential to what?

K.


So this is a government conspiracy of disinformation in order to dumb down our young people so they are subservient and ignorant of their rights? That is a bit of a reach.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

However it is a misrepresentation of the 2nd.


If you read any other part of the book, some essential facts are left out too. This is not an exhaustive treatise on History, it never claims to be nor does it represent itself in any way to be anything but preparation for a History exam.

No one has ever heard of Cliff Notes? Those books condense literature into its most basic essence. In the process they leave out gigantic parts of the book which in turn leaves out some of the overall meaning and point of the book. Cliff Notes never represents itself to be the book, it only serves as a guide. If you want to know what the book actually says, you have to go and read the book.

Come on folks, you have got to be able to distinguish between something that is presented to be an exact representation of something, and something only serving to be a summary. If this appeared in a textbook that was teaching the Constitution I could understand your ire, and I would be upset too, not once does this book state that it is anything than what it is.

< Message edited by Gauge -- 9/18/2013 11:56:02 AM >


_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Teaching Our Children Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109