Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 12:41:23 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
But what part of 'Reality' don't 'conservatives' understand? They are borrowing and spending at massively destructive levels.

With medical costs at a ridiculous amount now, Obamacare is not the answer!

OK, we have the most expensive health care in the world and it's about #20 when it comes to quality.
What's the answer?
Unfortunately, the R controlled house has no clue.

While more people will be covered under Obamacare, the most expensive health care in the world will be getting even more expensive. That was what the Forbes' article pointed out.

What you said has absolutely nothing to do with my post.
I wasn't, nor have I ever advocated Obamacare.
My post was about the problem the R side has with running around yelling "this is bad, this is horrible" without offering up anything resembling an alternative.


Sure it does. We have the most expensive health care in the world. We are in agreement on that.

Whether the GOP has the answers, I have no idea (their ideas are supported by many and refuted by many). But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue. Care is going to get that much more expensive as we continue down this road. I believe the article points out that it's going to be almost 20% GDP by 2030 or so.



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 12:49:33 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue.



Are you sure about that?

So far, all I've seen them say is that anything the other people say or do is bad.

Do you remember them saying that "Our #1 priority is to make Obama a 1 term president"?
Not running the country
Not getting us out of the sandbox
Not creating jobs
Not lowering the deficit
Not making Americans safe from terrorists.
Not fixing the decrepit infrastructure

The #1 priority was to fight Obama at every turn and make sure he never accomplishes anything.

That doesn't sound like people who have a fucking clue.

Seriously, how many times have they tried to repeal it without offering an alternative? Are they up to 40 yet?

Let it run and if it's as ruinous as they say it is, the American people will beg them to come into power and take it away.

I think the Republicans are deathly afraid that it just might work and they'll be well and truly fucked.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 9/23/2013 12:59:10 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 12:50:32 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
aging population, fancier treatments, I would not be taking too big a winger to say that with or without Obamacare (and hopefully subsequent fixing legislations) it will become spendier
.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 8:05:03 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
aging population, fancier treatments, I would not be taking too big a winger to say that with or without Obamacare (and hopefully subsequent fixing legislations) it will become spendier


Thanks for agreeing that Obamacare isn't going to control the costs of health care and make health care affordable.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 8:18:41 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue.

Are you sure about that?
So far, all I've seen them say is that anything the other people say or do is bad.
Do you remember them saying that "Our #1 priority is to make Obama a 1 term president"?
Not running the country
Not getting us out of the sandbox
Not creating jobs
Not lowering the deficit
Not making Americans safe from terrorists.
Not fixing the decrepit infrastructure
The #1 priority was to fight Obama at every turn and make sure he never accomplishes anything.
That doesn't sound like people who have a fucking clue.
Seriously, how many times have they tried to repeal it without offering an alternative? Are they up to 40 yet?
Let it run and if it's as ruinous as they say it is, the American people will beg them to come into power and take it away.
I think the Republicans are deathly afraid that it just might work and they'll be well and truly fucked.


They are running the country, or are to their best ability considering the Senate and Executive Branch aren't politically aligned with them.

The GOP isn't sending troops into the sandbox in defiance of the Senate and President.

Conservatives disagree with Liberals on "how" best to create jobs (or, more accurately, to create an environment that will foster an increase in employment). The Democrats aren't helping the Republicans, either. Either party can blame it on the other. Not going to do a damn bit of good, though.

The deficit won't be lowered until spending is decreased. That is something they are trying to do. Democrats don't want to cut spending appreciably, but want to raise tax rates to increase revenue. Same goal, different methods.

How are they not making Americans safe from terrorists?!? WTF?!?

Is it really the duty of the Federal Government to replace/repair the aging infrastructure? I can only agree that it's their duty when it's a Federal road, else it's up to the State, County, City, etc. Better question would be why has our infrastructure been allowed to decay as much as it has?

You really believe the GOP wasn't going to go along with Obama on anything, no matter what? Seriously?

Obamacare isn't going to work. Obamacare isn't going to make health care affordable. All it does is shift costs onto the wallets of those who make more money.

Democrats will always blame Republicans. Republicans will always blame Democrats. If Democrats won't pass (if they even discuss or vote on it) a bill passed in the House, how is it that it's the GOP's fault and not the Senate Democrats? How is it the House GOP's fault when they won't pass (if they even discuss or vote on it) a bill passed in the Senate? At some point in time, you have see that neither party is blameless and that both parties share the blame, and that the shares are pretty much equal.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 10:14:57 PM   
DsBound


Posts: 268
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

But what part of 'Reality' don't 'conservatives' understand? They are borrowing and spending at massively destructive levels.



With medical costs at a ridiculous amount now, Obamacare is not the answer!

OK, we have the most expensive health care in the world and it's about #20 when it comes to quality.

What's the answer?

Unfortunately, the R controlled house has no clue.


First off, end the monopoly... if we were able to truly shop for insurance, they would have to become competitive instead of it being a free for all. The government needs to get out if it. Shoot, they can't take care of their current "to do" list and were eager for them to control our medical? I wish I had all the answers, but I do know mandating people to purchase goods in order to be in good standing with mother government is not the answer.

Most people I know will not be able to afford this, and will be fined.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/23/2013 10:38:02 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
But what part of 'Reality' don't 'conservatives' understand? They are borrowing and spending at massively destructive levels.

With medical costs at a ridiculous amount now, Obamacare is not the answer!

OK, we have the most expensive health care in the world and it's about #20 when it comes to quality.
What's the answer?
Unfortunately, the R controlled house has no clue.

While more people will be covered under Obamacare, the most expensive health care in the world will be getting even more expensive. That was what the Forbes' article pointed out.

What you said has absolutely nothing to do with my post.
I wasn't, nor have I ever advocated Obamacare.
My post was about the problem the R side has with running around yelling "this is bad, this is horrible" without offering up anything resembling an alternative.


Sure it does. We have the most expensive health care in the world. We are in agreement on that.

Whether the GOP has the answers, I have no idea (their ideas are supported by many and refuted by many). But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue. Care is going to get that much more expensive as we continue down this road. I believe the article points out that it's going to be almost 20% GDP by 2030 or so.



People say we have the most expensive health care in the world as if this is an unalloyed bad thing.

When you live in a third world country - the vast majority of your money gets spend on food, shelter. As your country and yourself move up the ladder, you spend less and less time (money) on food, and shelter and start spending it on things like fast food, fast cars, fast women, and... healthcare.

The amount of money that we have to spend on healthcare is more a reflection on the amount of money we have; and the desirability of our health care options; rather than soley an unreasonable cost.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 5:11:23 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Sure it does. We have the most expensive health care in the world. We are in agreement on that.
Whether the GOP has the answers, I have no idea (their ideas are supported by many and refuted by many). But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue. Care is going to get that much more expensive as we continue down this road. I believe the article points out that it's going to be almost 20% GDP by 2030 or so.

People say we have the most expensive health care in the world as if this is an unalloyed bad thing.
When you live in a third world country - the vast majority of your money gets spend on food, shelter. As your country and yourself move up the ladder, you spend less and less time (money) on food, and shelter and start spending it on things like fast food, fast cars, fast women, and... healthcare.
The amount of money that we have to spend on healthcare is more a reflection on the amount of money we have; and the desirability of our health care options; rather than soley an unreasonable cost.


If you look at the actual costs of individual care procedures, we are spending a lot more than other countries. Is the MRI we get that much better than that gotten elsewhere? Are the physicians here that much better?

New tech is always more expensive. I get that. How much did it cost, initially, for laser eye surgery? That shit was expensive as Hell. Now, it's cheap, in comparison.

For certain outcomes we are getting what we are paying for. For other outcomes, we aren't.

Medical bankruptcies will show that we don't have as much money to spend on health care.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 6:09:54 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:


People say we have the most expensive health care in the world as if this is an unalloyed bad thing.


They say it because it is an unalloyed bad thing.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 6:14:54 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
But, their opposition to Obamacare certainly shows they have some sort of clue.

Are you sure about that?
So far, all I've seen them say is that anything the other people say or do is bad.
Do you remember them saying that "Our #1 priority is to make Obama a 1 term president"?
Not running the country
Not getting us out of the sandbox
Not creating jobs
Not lowering the deficit
Not making Americans safe from terrorists.
Not fixing the decrepit infrastructure
The #1 priority was to fight Obama at every turn and make sure he never accomplishes anything.
That doesn't sound like people who have a fucking clue.
Seriously, how many times have they tried to repeal it without offering an alternative? Are they up to 40 yet?
Let it run and if it's as ruinous as they say it is, the American people will beg them to come into power and take it away.
I think the Republicans are deathly afraid that it just might work and they'll be well and truly fucked.


They are running the country, or are to their best ability considering the Senate and Executive Branch aren't politically aligned with them.

The GOP isn't sending troops into the sandbox in defiance of the Senate and President.

Conservatives disagree with Liberals on "how" best to create jobs (or, more accurately, to create an environment that will foster an increase in employment). The Democrats aren't helping the Republicans, either. Either party can blame it on the other. Not going to do a damn bit of good, though.

The deficit won't be lowered until spending is decreased. That is something they are trying to do. Democrats don't want to cut spending appreciably, but want to raise tax rates to increase revenue. Same goal, different methods.

How are they not making Americans safe from terrorists?!? WTF?!?

Is it really the duty of the Federal Government to replace/repair the aging infrastructure? I can only agree that it's their duty when it's a Federal road, else it's up to the State, County, City, etc. Better question would be why has our infrastructure been allowed to decay as much as it has?

You really believe the GOP wasn't going to go along with Obama on anything, no matter what? Seriously?

Obamacare isn't going to work. Obamacare isn't going to make health care affordable. All it does is shift costs onto the wallets of those who make more money.

Democrats will always blame Republicans. Republicans will always blame Democrats. If Democrats won't pass (if they even discuss or vote on it) a bill passed in the House, how is it that it's the GOP's fault and not the Senate Democrats? How is it the House GOP's fault when they won't pass (if they even discuss or vote on it) a bill passed in the Senate? At some point in time, you have see that neither party is blameless and that both parties share the blame, and that the shares are pretty much equal.


Point = Totally Missed

I didn't say they weren't trying to do those things, I said it was not their #1 priority.
Their stated #1 priority was 'to make the president a 1 termer'.

In January of '09, there were at least 100 things more important to the country than that but "One Term President" was the #1 priority. instead of:
running the country
getting us out of the sandbox
creating jobs
lowering the deficit
making Americans safe from terrorists.
fixing the decrepit infrastructure

C'mon man, you have much better reading comprehension than that.

You said they were and are trying to run the country. Are you sure you didn't simply make a typo and misspell 'ruin'?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 6:20:47 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


People say we have the most expensive health care in the world as if this is an unalloyed bad thing.


When it's about #20 in quality, that's downright shitty.

Let's put it in terms of cars.

What would you say about the American Auto industry if Americans (except the very wealthy) were forced to drive Yugos and pay 80K each for them while the rest of industrialized world was driving Mercedes, Porches, Jaguars, Beemers, Cadillacs, Audis, etc and paying 20K to 60K for them?
You'd be screaming.

Now US health care isn't quite a Yugo but it's no better than a Chevy Cavalier and we're paying for a Lotus.

What ever happened to "you get what you pay for"?
The American public doesn't.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 6:43:37 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


People say we have the most expensive health care in the world as if this is an unalloyed bad thing.


When it's about #20 in quality, that's downright shitty.

Let's put it in terms of cars.

What would you say about the American Auto industry if Americans (except the very wealthy) were forced to drive Yugos and pay 80K each for them while the rest of industrialized world was driving Mercedes, Porches, Jaguars, Beemers, Cadillacs, Audis, etc and paying 20K to 60K for them?
You'd be screaming.

Now US health care isn't quite a Yugo but it's no better than a Chevy Cavalier and we're paying for a Lotus.

What ever happened to "you get what you pay for"?
The American public doesn't.


Regarding 80K Yugos: If we had 80K yugos we were forced to pay for I'd say we just bailed out GM. Oh right. We did that.

Probably 80% of all medical innovations are developed in the US.
Look, I'm not saying there aren't problems with the current system. But you're saying lets make the current system better by making prices go... up?

Look, you have 33 million uninsured with our current costs. Do you think that you will have less uninsured when costs go up? Even with the threat of law, people are not going to pay $500 a month that they can't afford.

Final thought: you (generic) don't want a system where you get what you pay for. You(generic) want a system where someone else pays for what you (generic) get.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 9/24/2013 6:45:23 AM >

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 6:45:38 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Probably not. Why are costs going up? We have the most expensive healthcare in the world, with a middling outcome. Where is the money going? It is not going to outcome.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:18:43 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Probably not. Why are costs going up? We have the most expensive healthcare in the world, with a middling outcome. Where is the money going? It is not going to outcome.


Why are costs going up?
Huge health care conglomerates are raising prices.

Because there are too few doctor's offices competing.

because federal regulations means the average cost of delivering a new drug in the us exceed 700 million.

because threat of tort action makes doctors practice defensive medicine.

because consumers have no incentive to shop for the best price/services. Since they don't pay for it, they go for the "best" care.

because hospitals pass the costs of the uninsured onto those that are insured, or pay cash.

And none of these things is obamacare resolving.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 9/24/2013 7:19:09 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:28:26 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

But you're saying lets make the current system better by making prices go... up?


No I'm not.

Once again, I do not support Obamacare.
If you've read my posts, you'd note I don't particularly support Obama. (unless you call referring to him as the least effective president in a couple of generations support)
I'm saying that the system is badly broken and the Republicans who control the house would rather see the whole country go down in flames than fix it because they're afraid he might get some inkling of credit.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:30:21 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Well they need something to balance out the lefts planks.

Try to extend the abortion limit to a week after birth.

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?

quote:

Tax the hell out of the people.


Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?
quote:

Dismantle the defense system.

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?
quote:

ban all guns

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?
quote:


complain that the government is too small

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?
quote:

make Christianity a crime.

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?
quote:

Oppose anything the right proposes.

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?

quote:

Not too concerned about immigration. Just open the borders and let them in. After all the government can pay for them since they have unlimited funds.

Would you have any validation for this moronic bullshit?


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:34:14 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion

What part of "REALITY" don't Liberals understand? You cannot give everyone, everything and think it is all going to work out. Forget what education Greece, Spain, etc, etc, etc. got from Liberal ideas. The latest CBO figures show our spending is unstainable.


Perhaps the cost of the adventure in the sand box is too costly?

quote:

Our economy is phony and being propped up by the government printing 85 billion a month out of thin air. The only reason other countries need our dollars is because it is the "international currency" Russia and China are making deals with other countries that don't require purchases between countries in US dollars. When enough countries agree to this, we are screwed and the dollar will become almost worthless. Buy silver and gold to cover your ass when the shit hits the fan.

Is there some econ book that we could look at to validate this mindnumbing stupid opinion?

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:38:54 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

But you're saying lets make the current system better by making prices go... up?


No I'm not.

Once again, I do not support Obamacare.
If you've read my posts, you'd note I don't particularly support Obama. (unless you call referring to him as the least effective president in a couple of generations support)
I'm saying that the system is badly broken and the Republicans who control the house would rather see the whole country go down in flames than fix it because they're afraid he might get some inkling of credit.


Hill, I wasn't referring to you in a specific sense; it was you in the generic sense of people that want obama care. Sorry for the confusion.

Regarding the system is badly broken - there have been times in the past that duels erupted on the floor of the house. I think the noise that is happening now is evidence only of the normal disfunction of democracy.

That said, I do believe every generation must make the effort to preserve freedom and democracy.

The noise of democracy doesn't concern me. I think the greatest threat to our freedoms is the ever constant erosion of bigger government, bigger corporations, bigger unions.

I would tax companies bigger than 50K people or so, whether through direct taxation or tariffs. Or bigger than say 1 bil in assets. I would require them to split via anti trust action.

I would outlaw govt unions. Unions can only represent their industry.

I would cut the pay of most govt works to 24K + 1/3 of what they were making previously.

I would allow corporations that agree to caps on executive salary, and that reduced prices to the american public to pay no corporate taxes.

Etc.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:40:01 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Probably not. Why are costs going up? We have the most expensive healthcare in the world, with a middling outcome. Where is the money going? It is not going to outcome.


Why are costs going up?
Huge health care conglomerates are raising prices.


Is this something new or is this pretty much old news?

quote:

Because there are too few doctor's offices competing.


Doesn't the ama limits the number of doctors in the u.s.?

quote:

because federal regulations means the average cost of delivering a new drug in the us exceed 700 million.


Which part of that protocol would you like to see removed?

quote:

because threat of tort action makes doctors practice defensive medicine.

Should incompetet doctors be protected from torts?

quote:

because consumers have no incentive to shop for the best price/services. Since they don't pay for it, they go for the "best" care.


Why should anyone seek less than the best care?

quote:

because hospitals pass the costs of the uninsured onto those that are insured, or pay cash.
And none of these things is obamacare resolving.

The aca also does not address global warming,the escalating cost of fuel,or hunger in apalachia

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 9/24/2013 7:44:11 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare - 9/24/2013 7:40:51 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion

What part of "REALITY" don't Liberals understand? You cannot give everyone, everything and think it is all going to work out. Forget what education Greece, Spain, etc, etc, etc. got from Liberal ideas. The latest CBO figures show our spending is unstainable.


Perhaps the cost of the adventure in the sand box is too costly?

quote:

Our economy is phony and being propped up by the government printing 85 billion a month out of thin air. The only reason other countries need our dollars is because it is the "international currency" Russia and China are making deals with other countries that don't require purchases between countries in US dollars. When enough countries agree to this, we are screwed and the dollar will become almost worthless. Buy silver and gold to cover your ass when the shit hits the fan.

Is there some econ book that we could look at to validate this mindnumbing stupid opinion?


Papassion is right that the role of the dollar in international currency has declined over the last ten years. Google it.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Interesting Take on Obamacare Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125