DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah, and he voted for the procedural vote that he was slobbering against. Damn poor theatre. Voting for it gives you the opportunity to ask for a recount at a later date. Hedge your bets if the vote is close. Nope. That is the most ludicrous shite ever uttered internet wise. THere is no fucking recount. He can ask for a vote (yeas and nays) on the question under consideration, that is all. it has to be sustained by 11 senators (one fifth the quorum) he cannot ask for a count once the bill has passed consideration, it must be immediate. But he can never ever ask for a re-polling of that count or any past count, if it was entered in the journal by a request for recording (11 senators again) then it is in the record, if it is asked to be called by voice (from the old, then without objection the measure is passed). . . there is no recount. And his being in or out of any prior votes or talking about green eggs or ham is inconsequential to the senate rules for voting. Wrong again Ron. Look up a motion to reconsider. Byrd, who was a master tactician, used it on two occasions to great effect in the US senate. a motion to reconsider is not a recount it is a literal revote. However the motion to reconsider on the CR was already made and tabled as is standard practice on all bills now.
|