RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:19:43 PM)

When is the last time there was a thread on here about a self defense case where you said one word in defense of the man protecting himself or his family.
Now tell me again how nobody goes after the person who defends himself.




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:28:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


Is anything that looks 'anti-individualist' to be consigned into the 'statist dustbin'? What about communities? There are entities that are bigger than individuals but smaller than the State.




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:35:08 PM)

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:39:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

When is the last time there was a thread on here about a self defense case where you said one word in defense of the man protecting himself or his family.
Now tell me again how nobody goes after the person who defends himself.


Because the cases that happens to be reported are always borderline in legal and moral terms! Otherwise there would be no reason to discuss them! If there was an article saying: "intuder gets killed in victim home/shop" I would say nothing against the home owner! But when it is about a moron that goes outside and shoots at every car passing by than no I'm not cool with that!




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:41:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


I'm not a statist, I'm very far from that, but nor I have a fetish for the wild west. Anyway keep your gangs so to not seem socialist and have fun.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:45:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

When is the last time there was a thread on here about a self defense case where you said one word in defense of the man protecting himself or his family.
Now tell me again how nobody goes after the person who defends himself.


Because the cases that happens to be reported are always borderline in legal and moral terms! Otherwise there would be no reason to discuss them! If there was an article saying: "intuder gets killed in victim home/shop" I would say nothing against the home owner! But when it is about a moron that goes outside and shoots at every car passing by than no I'm not cool with that!

But you have never once had anything to say in favor of anyone who was defending themselves.
You would think that just once you would find that just one person was justified.
There have been several cases where I took a position opposing them.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:47:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


I'm not a statist, I'm very far from that, but nor I have a fetish for the wild west. Anyway keep your gangs so to not seem socialist and have fun.

And yet you see individualism as a weakness.
That is a perfect summation of the statist viewpoint.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:49:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


I'm not a statist, I'm very far from that, but nor I have a fetish for the wild west. Anyway keep your gangs so to not seem socialist and have fun.


There you go deliberately misrepresenting my statements.  Nothing I said could be construed as to mean I want to keep gangs.




EdBowie -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:50:29 PM)

A low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the street???? How low, exactly?
quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.





BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 4:56:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.

Yet another misrepresentation, I know of know one who wants to take on the gangs without the police, but we want to be able to defend ourselves while we are waiting for them to show up.
And the assertion that people who want to defend themselves don't care about others is ridiculous.
But you are one of those who while you don't even realize it want us to hide in our homes while hearing our neighbor s being raped or murdered.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 8:23:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


Is anything that looks 'anti-individualist' to be consigned into the 'statist dustbin'? What about communities? There are entities that are bigger than individuals but smaller than the State.

Get real you know that being a community does not mean being anti individual.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 8:24:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

When is the last time there was a thread on here about a self defense case where you said one word in defense of the man protecting himself or his family.
Now tell me again how nobody goes after the person who defends himself.


Because the cases that happens to be reported are always borderline in legal and moral terms! Otherwise there would be no reason to discuss them! If there was an article saying: "intuder gets killed in victim home/shop" I would say nothing against the home owner! But when it is about a moron that goes outside and shoots at every car passing by than no I'm not cool with that!

Another example of how you will believe a anti gun blog over a judge.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/3/2013 8:59:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


Is anything that looks 'anti-individualist' to be consigned into the 'statist dustbin'? What about communities? There are entities that are bigger than individuals but smaller than the State.

You seem to have confused individualism with anarchism




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 12:27:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

A low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the street???? How low, exactly?
quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.




You have 256 police officers every 100000 persons and one police officer every 12 squared km, in Italy we have 417 police officers every 100000 persons and one police officer every 1.2 squared km, in another thread jlf1961 said in his area in average police needs 25 minutes to show up, we have a police station every 7 minutes drive also in rural areas. That's what I meant.




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 12:38:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.

Yet another misrepresentation, I know of know one who wants to take on the gangs without the police, but we want to be able to defend ourselves while we are waiting for them to show up.
And the assertion that people who want to defend themselves don't care about others is ridiculous.
But you are one of those who while you don't even realize it want us to hide in our homes while hearing our neighbor s being raped or murdered.


sorry "not caring" was not the right words, I made a mistake, what I meant was warring only when crimes happen instead caring how to prevent them for the safety of everyone else even people you don't know, guns can't do that period, if you have to defend yourself so much it means that society failed as a whole.




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 12:40:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

When is the last time there was a thread on here about a self defense case where you said one word in defense of the man protecting himself or his family.
Now tell me again how nobody goes after the person who defends himself.


Because the cases that happens to be reported are always borderline in legal and moral terms! Otherwise there would be no reason to discuss them! If there was an article saying: "intuder gets killed in victim home/shop" I would say nothing against the home owner! But when it is about a moron that goes outside and shoots at every car passing by than no I'm not cool with that!

Another example of how you will believe a anti gun blog over a judge.


that judge applied a permissive law with the looser interpretation possible, the law was wrong and badly written.




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 2:05:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


Is anything that looks 'anti-individualist' to be consigned into the 'statist dustbin'? What about communities? There are entities that are bigger than individuals but smaller than the State.

Get real you know that being a community does not mean being anti individual.


Exactly.




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 5:08:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I suppose this are not the value accepted by the majority of people composing your society, it's just that some are exploiting the weakness of your individualism forming organized groups.

------------------------

Predictable statist view. 


Is anything that looks 'anti-individualist' to be consigned into the 'statist dustbin'? What about communities? There are entities that are bigger than individuals but smaller than the State.

You seem to have confused individualism with anarchism


No, I haven't.




thishereboi -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 5:12:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

it downloads a document from the united nations you can see it checking the link address by the way it's also on wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

the other link, the one for the race based stats, is from the us department if justice



Nice link but it doesn't say anywhere that people in the US kill 5 times as many as those in Europe.


if the intentional homicide rate in the US is 4.7 and the average rate in european union is 1 then it says that people in US kills 4.7 times more than people in EU


The european union is not mentioned in the link.




eulero83 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/4/2013 5:49:38 AM)

use google I found it on a document in italian, but they are public statistics




Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1416016