RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:17:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Actually Lucy is Canadian


Lmfao.........actually she isnt.


Actually her profile says she is. But maybe she is from someplace else and just residing there.

Ive stated in politics n religion alone that Im a brit, english or british, more than 15 times in 3 years.
Im also calling you on the BS that he pulled into the driveway.
greenvill reporting.....
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20131011/NEWS10/310110005/Immunity-granted-to-S-C-man-who-killed-unarmed-teen-in-stand-your-ground-case

WISTV says
Authorities say Smith then saw Niles' car and fired his gun from his front yard, hitting Niles, who was not armed, in the head.
and
"It's not right; it's not right," said Niles. "Just to think he took my child's life away when my baby was helping his child get home."
AND the State
Scott went to his front yard after getting his daughter inside, and fired at Niles, who was in his own car (not the SUV) and was unarmed.
The daily mail says
The court heard that Scott meant to shoot at a car that was full of teenage girls who had threatened the life of his daughter and who drove past his house and fired shots.
Shot dead: 17-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was shot dead by Shannon Anthony Scott in April 2010
However, Scott returned fire and instead of hitting the girls, who shot Niles in the head.

The state , who has more info than any other

http://www.thestate.com/2013/08/16/2924473/is-shooting-a-bystander-in-south.html
According to all the evidence in a pre-trial hearing on the issue, Niles was across a street and in no way threatening Scott when the teen took a .380 bullet to the head in April 2010 near Scott’s house off Beltline Boulevard near Two Notch Road. He died almost instantly.

If Murphy grants immunity to Scott it would be “be the first time any state in this Union” has granted immunity for killing an innocent bystander in a Stand Your Ground case, 5th Circuit Assistant Solicitor April Sampson told Murphy.

“If this law were to be applied the way (Scott) wants to apply it, he could shoot a 4-year-old playing in her front yard and still be immune from prosecution,” Sampson said.

In an initial interview that night, Scott didn’t give officers his name, nor did he tell officers he had fired a gun that night, Sampson said.

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”

But Rutherford said, “All we know is that Mr. Scott stood there in his yard, the only thing between his children and people intending to do them harm.”


http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/09/3029466/exclusive-father-not-charged-in.html

The case involved the 2010 shooting of Darrell Niles, 17, a Keenan High School student and basketball player, who was across the street in a car when Shannon Scott, then 33, fired his handgun.
Shortly before, an SUV filled with youths who had been threatening his 15-year-old daughter drove by his house and they fired shots, according to testimony in the case.
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.
During the hearing, Murphy heard conflicting testimony as to whether anyone fired at Scott while he was in his front yard that night.


http://www.thestate.com/2010/04/22/1254758_suspect-arrested-in-teens-shooting.html
Shannon Anthony Scott has been charged with murder, the Columbia Police Department reported. He turned himself in to investigators at police headquarters Wednesday afternoon.

Seventeen-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was found shot to death in his Honda Accord at 2:30 a.m. Sunday in the 1400 block of Bonner Avenue, the police said.

Scott is accused of firing several rounds from a handgun, hitting Niles in the head with one bullet, police said.

It was the fourth time since February that a young man has been found shot to death in a car in Columbia.


now where are your links/....
I have a couple more to show...seeing as you really do not seem to have all your facts lined up, IM really wanting to see where he was sposedly parked in the driveway.
you and powergamez have a huge lack of facts at your disposal and its really not helping your argument.



Every news story says something different happened.
The only person with a mass of verified facts is the judge.
Isn't there some remote chance that the judge has some idea of what he is doing?
The outrage should be that these girls haven't been hunted down and charged, their crime set things in motion and every thing else is a Red Herring.




PeonForHer -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:19:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”



Let's face it, at best Scott is a bit of a gormless turd, Bama, isn't he? I'd be embarrassed at having a neighbour who'd put a notice in his window saying that, even if I'd lived in the USA for decades and tried really hard for all that time not to get embarrassed by such things.




Lucylastic -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:28:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic



Actually her profile says she is. But maybe she is from someplace else and just residing there.

Ive stated in politics n religion alone that Im a brit, english or british, more than 15 times in 3 years.
Im also calling you on the BS that he pulled into the driveway.
greenvill reporting.....
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20131011/NEWS10/310110005/Immunity-granted-to-S-C-man-who-killed-unarmed-teen-in-stand-your-ground-case

WISTV says
Authorities say Smith then saw Niles' car and fired his gun from his front yard, hitting Niles, who was not armed, in the head.
and
"It's not right; it's not right," said Niles. "Just to think he took my child's life away when my baby was helping his child get home."
AND the State
Scott went to his front yard after getting his daughter inside, and fired at Niles, who was in his own car (not the SUV) and was unarmed.
The daily mail says
The court heard that Scott meant to shoot at a car that was full of teenage girls who had threatened the life of his daughter and who drove past his house and fired shots.
Shot dead: 17-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was shot dead by Shannon Anthony Scott in April 2010
However, Scott returned fire and instead of hitting the girls, who shot Niles in the head.

The state , who has more info than any other

http://www.thestate.com/2013/08/16/2924473/is-shooting-a-bystander-in-south.html
According to all the evidence in a pre-trial hearing on the issue, Niles was across a street and in no way threatening Scott when the teen took a .380 bullet to the head in April 2010 near Scott’s house off Beltline Boulevard near Two Notch Road. He died almost instantly.

If Murphy grants immunity to Scott it would be “be the first time any state in this Union” has granted immunity for killing an innocent bystander in a Stand Your Ground case, 5th Circuit Assistant Solicitor April Sampson told Murphy.

“If this law were to be applied the way (Scott) wants to apply it, he could shoot a 4-year-old playing in her front yard and still be immune from prosecution,” Sampson said.

In an initial interview that night, Scott didn’t give officers his name, nor did he tell officers he had fired a gun that night, Sampson said.

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”

But Rutherford said, “All we know is that Mr. Scott stood there in his yard, the only thing between his children and people intending to do them harm.”


http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/09/3029466/exclusive-father-not-charged-in.html

The case involved the 2010 shooting of Darrell Niles, 17, a Keenan High School student and basketball player, who was across the street in a car when Shannon Scott, then 33, fired his handgun.
Shortly before, an SUV filled with youths who had been threatening his 15-year-old daughter drove by his house and they fired shots, according to testimony in the case.
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.
During the hearing, Murphy heard conflicting testimony as to whether anyone fired at Scott while he was in his front yard that night.


http://www.thestate.com/2010/04/22/1254758_suspect-arrested-in-teens-shooting.html
Shannon Anthony Scott has been charged with murder, the Columbia Police Department reported. He turned himself in to investigators at police headquarters Wednesday afternoon.

Seventeen-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was found shot to death in his Honda Accord at 2:30 a.m. Sunday in the 1400 block of Bonner Avenue, the police said.

Scott is accused of firing several rounds from a handgun, hitting Niles in the head with one bullet, police said.

It was the fourth time since February that a young man has been found shot to death in a car in Columbia.


now where are your links/....
I have a couple more to show...seeing as you really do not seem to have all your facts lined up, IM really wanting to see where he was sposedly parked in the driveway.
you and powergamez have a huge lack of facts at your disposal and its really not helping your argument.



Every news story says something different happened.
The only person with a mass of verified facts is the judge.
Isn't there some remote chance that the judge has some idea of what he is doing?
The outrage should be that these girls haven't been hunted down and charged, their crime set things in motion and every thing else is a Red Herring.

where is your link, where is your "fact" that he was in the driveway.....no where, and the fact that you ignore everything to make your point again(which again has changed, again because you cannot back up or deny anything with anything but conjecture) really isnt helping your case.
He managed to hit him in the head, killing him outright... but never hit the other car?




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:42:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic



Actually her profile says she is. But maybe she is from someplace else and just residing there.

Ive stated in politics n religion alone that Im a brit, english or british, more than 15 times in 3 years.
Im also calling you on the BS that he pulled into the driveway.
greenvill reporting.....
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20131011/NEWS10/310110005/Immunity-granted-to-S-C-man-who-killed-unarmed-teen-in-stand-your-ground-case

WISTV says
Authorities say Smith then saw Niles' car and fired his gun from his front yard, hitting Niles, who was not armed, in the head.
and
"It's not right; it's not right," said Niles. "Just to think he took my child's life away when my baby was helping his child get home."
AND the State
Scott went to his front yard after getting his daughter inside, and fired at Niles, who was in his own car (not the SUV) and was unarmed.
The daily mail says
The court heard that Scott meant to shoot at a car that was full of teenage girls who had threatened the life of his daughter and who drove past his house and fired shots.
Shot dead: 17-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was shot dead by Shannon Anthony Scott in April 2010
However, Scott returned fire and instead of hitting the girls, who shot Niles in the head.

The state , who has more info than any other

http://www.thestate.com/2013/08/16/2924473/is-shooting-a-bystander-in-south.html
According to all the evidence in a pre-trial hearing on the issue, Niles was across a street and in no way threatening Scott when the teen took a .380 bullet to the head in April 2010 near Scott’s house off Beltline Boulevard near Two Notch Road. He died almost instantly.

If Murphy grants immunity to Scott it would be “be the first time any state in this Union” has granted immunity for killing an innocent bystander in a Stand Your Ground case, 5th Circuit Assistant Solicitor April Sampson told Murphy.

“If this law were to be applied the way (Scott) wants to apply it, he could shoot a 4-year-old playing in her front yard and still be immune from prosecution,” Sampson said.

In an initial interview that night, Scott didn’t give officers his name, nor did he tell officers he had fired a gun that night, Sampson said.

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”

But Rutherford said, “All we know is that Mr. Scott stood there in his yard, the only thing between his children and people intending to do them harm.”


http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/09/3029466/exclusive-father-not-charged-in.html

The case involved the 2010 shooting of Darrell Niles, 17, a Keenan High School student and basketball player, who was across the street in a car when Shannon Scott, then 33, fired his handgun.
Shortly before, an SUV filled with youths who had been threatening his 15-year-old daughter drove by his house and they fired shots, according to testimony in the case.
Smith then saw Niles’ 1992 Honda, and, believing its occupants posed a danger, fired his gun from his front yard across the street, hitting Niles in the head with a .380 bullet, killing him instantly. No evidence indicated Niles was a threat to Scott or his daughter.
During the hearing, Murphy heard conflicting testimony as to whether anyone fired at Scott while he was in his front yard that night.


http://www.thestate.com/2010/04/22/1254758_suspect-arrested-in-teens-shooting.html
Shannon Anthony Scott has been charged with murder, the Columbia Police Department reported. He turned himself in to investigators at police headquarters Wednesday afternoon.

Seventeen-year-old Darrell Andre Niles was found shot to death in his Honda Accord at 2:30 a.m. Sunday in the 1400 block of Bonner Avenue, the police said.

Scott is accused of firing several rounds from a handgun, hitting Niles in the head with one bullet, police said.

It was the fourth time since February that a young man has been found shot to death in a car in Columbia.


now where are your links/....
I have a couple more to show...seeing as you really do not seem to have all your facts lined up, IM really wanting to see where he was sposedly parked in the driveway.
you and powergamez have a huge lack of facts at your disposal and its really not helping your argument.



Every news story says something different happened.
The only person with a mass of verified facts is the judge.
Isn't there some remote chance that the judge has some idea of what he is doing?
The outrage should be that these girls haven't been hunted down and charged, their crime set things in motion and every thing else is a Red Herring.

where is your link, where is your "fact" that he was in the driveway.....no where, and the fact that you ignore everything to make your point again(which again has changed, again because you cannot back up or deny anything with anything but conjecture) really isnt helping your case.
He managed to hit him in the head, killing him outright... but never hit the other car?


Moving car in the dark at a minimum of 20-25 yards at that range in the dark you do good to see a head let alone deliberately hit it.




VideoAdminChi -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:57:16 PM)

FR,

This thread is locked for review.




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 6:57:26 PM)

where is your link, where is your "fact" that he was in the driveway.....no where, and the fact that you ignore everything to make your point again(which again has changed, again because you cannot back up or deny anything with anything but conjecture) really isnt helping your case.

My case doesn't need help, the judge has spoken.

If you rad my post you will see that I did not state that it was a fact but that the only site I had found that said Scott deliberately shot Niles said he had pulled into the driveway.
I doubt you see the difference but it is significant.




VideoAdminChi -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 7:14:51 PM)

Unlocked. As a reminder, do not allow comments about each other turn in to a hijack of the thread.




eulero83 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/16/2013 11:58:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

This isnt about the girls who started it, thats just your continued red herring to deflect the blame from where it belongs.


Absolute proof you do not understand American law.


Who cares? I'm much more interested in how it can happen that some retarded idiot and/or fruitcake can blow away the life of an innocent man and not even be brought to court over it. Have you *any idea at all* of how insane that looks to anyone outside of the USA?


Probably also inside the usa if it is reported in national media, I don't understand this need of dicotomy that can't go past hero and villain categories, a jakass is such even with a CC permit.




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:26:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

This isnt about the girls who started it, thats just your continued red herring to deflect the blame from where it belongs.


Absolute proof you do not understand American law.


Who cares? I'm much more interested in how it can happen that some retarded idiot and/or fruitcake can blow away the life of an innocent man and not even be brought to court over it. Have you *any idea at all* of how insane that looks to anyone outside of the USA?


Probably also inside the usa if it is reported in national media, I don't understand this need of dicotomy that can't go past hero and villain categories, a jakass is such even with a CC permit.

It is about the girls why can't some people understand this?




eulero83 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:59:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

This isnt about the girls who started it, thats just your continued red herring to deflect the blame from where it belongs.


Absolute proof you do not understand American law.


Who cares? I'm much more interested in how it can happen that some retarded idiot and/or fruitcake can blow away the life of an innocent man and not even be brought to court over it. Have you *any idea at all* of how insane that looks to anyone outside of the USA?


Probably also inside the usa if it is reported in national media, I don't understand this need of dicotomy that can't go past hero and villain categories, a jakass is such even with a CC permit.

It is about the girls why can't some people understand this?


Because even if the american law, as crime prevention tool, charges everything on whoever had the criminal intent, it is just irresponsible to shoot at everything moves, doing this poses a danger for the public safety period. At some point he decided the other car was also standing a threat with no evidence to support this but "just in case" and facts revealed his summary judgement was wrong. There are a lot of holes and contrasting witnesses statements in what was reported by the news, but the pure act demostrate how low is the bar when it comes to responsibilities in using a gun in the USA.
I just wonder if another law abiding gun owner saw you have a gun while walking near him, how much reasonable doubt do you think he should give you before fearing for himself killing you?




Politesub53 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 3:44:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Shortly before the shooting, an SUV filled with young people who had threatened Scott's teenage daughter drove by his house and fired shots. Authorities say Smith then saw Niles' car and fired his gun from his front yard, hitting Niles, who was not armed, in the head. << Now ypou will be telling me the authorities are also wrong.


I missed the part were they said he fired at Neil.
Oh yes that is because it isn't there.



How obtuse can you get, arguing with me is one thing, arguing with the official story is stupid......... Smith said he saw Niles` car and fired from the front yard, hitting Niles, who was not armed, in the head. << That right there is plain enough for anyone (One would have thought) and it comes straight from the authorities, quoting the bloody gunman. So your constant denial is hardly credible.




Politesub53 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 3:54:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Two cars come by shots are fired at you, you return fire, and you are to assume second car just followed your daughter home for purely innocent reasons ?


This is a blatant lie, as shown by the families statement (Which, let me remind you, quotes police photgraphs)

The girls had driven off, Niles came down the road with his lights on, photgraphs prove that point. Scott said he saw a car coming down the road with his lights off, he fired at it and hit Niles in the head....

All of the above is true except for one thing, Niles had his lights on, police photographs show that according to the family statement.

I hate quoting the obvious, because I shouldnt need to.




Politesub53 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 3:58:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”


Such an incredible leap in logic as to defy belief.


What would you suggest "fight crime - shoot first" actually suggests ?





BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:18:11 PM)

I just wonder if another law abiding gun owner saw you have a gun while walking near him, how much reasonable doubt do you think he should give you before fearing for himself killing you?

I would have to do something hostile toward him like demand his money or threaten him.
Contrary to what most Europeans have been led to believe there is a standard of threat needed to claim self defense. Being shot at as in this case fills the bill.




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:19:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And Sampson depicted Scott as a man primed to kill. “He had a sign in his window saying ‘Fight Crime – Shoot First.’”


Such an incredible leap in logic as to defy belief.


What would you suggest "fight crime - shoot first" actually suggests ?



Cultural thing proclaiming belief in self defense with a little humor.
And he didn't shoot first.




PeonForHer -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:28:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
It is about the girls why can't some people understand this?


Political debate fundamentals: All contestants in a political debate try to define the grounds on which that debate should take place. (Some people even claim that their view isn't 'political' at all, as we've already seen). So the debate of this thread only focuses on the girls for those who want it to focus on the girls.




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 12:46:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
It is about the girls why can't some people understand this?


Political debate fundamentals: All contestants in a political debate try to define the grounds on which that debate should take place. (Some people even claim that their view isn't 'political' at all, as we've already seen). So the debate of this thread only focuses on the girls for those who want it to focus on the girls.

Do you have any idea how insane it seems to Americans not to focus on the instigators of the violence.
Had they not done so there would have been no situation.




PeonForHer -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 2:29:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Do you have any idea how insane it seems to Americans not to focus on the instigators of the violence.
Had they not done so there would have been no situation.


I shall treasure that point, Bama.




eulero83 -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 3:11:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I just wonder if another law abiding gun owner saw you have a gun while walking near him, how much reasonable doubt do you think he should give you before fearing for himself killing you?

I would have to do something hostile toward him like demand his money or threaten him.
Contrary to what most Europeans have been led to believe there is a standard of threat needed to claim self defense. Being shot at as in this case fills the bill.


I quoted south carolina law some posts ago, so I'm sure there is, I don't understand how a car driving on a road or parked on the other side of the road can be so much out of ordinary to be a reasonable threat. You say the judge has more details, but for what I read there are so many different versions given by the witnesses that the judge belived proof were not enought to support a trial, also due to how the statute is written.
In this case it sounds more like a tecnicality than a costitutional right, and even if the conduct of this person was in the limits on a legal base, he was way over the limit from a moral point of view, so in the end of the story he killed one of his doughter friends that she called for help, it's true that no good deed goes unpunished.




BamaD -> RE: Innocent bystander killed in SYG case (10/17/2013 3:43:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I just wonder if another law abiding gun owner saw you have a gun while walking near him, how much reasonable doubt do you think he should give you before fearing for himself killing you?

I would have to do something hostile toward him like demand his money or threaten him.
Contrary to what most Europeans have been led to believe there is a standard of threat needed to claim self defense. Being shot at as in this case fills the bill.


I quoted south carolina law some posts ago, so I'm sure there is, I don't understand how a car driving on a road or parked on the other side of the road can be so much out of ordinary to be a reasonable threat. You say the judge has more details, but for what I read there are so many different versions given by the witnesses that the judge belived proof were not enought to support a trial, also due to how the statute is written.
In this case it sounds more like a tecnicality than a costitutional right, and even if the conduct of this person was in the limits on a legal base, he was way over the limit from a moral point of view, so in the end of the story he killed one of his doughter friends that she called for help, it's true that no good deed goes unpunished.

I have been told that without a doubt he was just sitting across the street, and that without a doubt he was driving by.
In either case just seeing his head would have been difficult in that light hitting that target would be nearly impossible.
Had the man not been returning fire it wouldn't have happened, if there had not been a drive by he wouldn't have been returning fire at any target now would he?
Clearly there is not the evidence that he committed a crime or he would have been charged.
I have been told everything from they haven't found the girls to they claim self defense.
We have only what the media have told us much is clearly biased the rest could be.
Any news report that says this was SYG is flawed as it does not even come into play when you are on your own property or have been shot at. Both are the case here.
I found it particularly amusing when told that the girls must be innocent because they haven't been charged by someone who is outraged because Scott was not charged by the same court.
As pointed by an earlier poster if the girls were juveniles their records would be sealed and they could be doing time for murder right now and we wouldn't know it.
What is wrong with pretending the judge knew what he was doing (him having all available facts and all) until his whole ruling is released.
Right now we have one cherry picked statement chosen to promote a position more than to reveal the truth.




Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.109375