quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Thats funny cos I posted where his criminal court records are...pretty much figure you have to know what town/city he is in to do that...

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

lovmuffin :

It's also interesting to note that 20 or so years of gun control initiated by dushebag British politicians had effectively disarmed its citizens. Americans stepped up to fill the void sending arms and ammo to the British citizens as they were in fear of a Nazi invasion.

Typical bullshit post. There were no small arms exchanged until after the fall of France. Most British equimpent had been abandoned prior to then, during the evacuation from Dunkirk.

I call bullshit on your bullshit.

William Tell overture please, third movement.......

NRA to the rescue.


".........National Rifle Association opposed gun registration at the time and still does. The American Riflemen for February 1942 reported:
........During the war years the (American) Rifleman (magazine) (NRA monthly publication) regularly included pleas for American sportsmen to "send a gun to defend a British home.......British civilians, faced with the threat of invasion, desperately need arms for the defense of their homes." Indeed, the New York Times carried the same solicitations. After two decades of gun control, British citizens now desperately needed rifles and pistols in their homes, and they received the gifts with great appreciation. Organized into the Home Guard, armed citizens were now ready to resist the expected Nazi onslaught."


http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/registration_article/registration.html



"The U.S. National Rifle Association collected and shipped large numbers of privately donated rifles for use by the Home Guard. These were collected and destroyed after the war."

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Guard_(United_Kingdom)

Click on "equipment and training"

Then whadahya do ?? You guys fucking destroy the guns we sent you after the war was over ???

It doesn't surprise me anymore that you guys drive on the wrong side of the road. [8D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

Has anyone seen what city this happened in?
Just realized that I haven't seen the city mentioned in one article.
Doesn't mean it isn't in one just haven't seen it.
Strange

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

What I meant is for our culture not prosecuting a person that shoots random cars driving/parked on a public road is like not prosecuting the rapist in UAE because he was justified under sharia's law. He took unnecessary risks and ended up killing an innocent person.

It was obvious what you meant but the idea of locking up the person who didn't commit a crime is the closer comparison.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

lovmuffin :

It's also interesting to note that 20 or so years of gun control initiated by dushebag British politicians had effectively disarmed its citizens. Americans stepped up to fill the void sending arms and ammo to the British citizens as they were in fear of a Nazi invasion.

Typical bullshit post. There were no small arms exchanged until after the fall of France. Most British equimpent had been abandoned prior to then, during the evacuation from Dunkirk.

I call bullshit on your bullshit.

William Tell overture please, third movement.......

NRA to the rescue.


".........National Rifle Association opposed gun registration at the time and still does. The American Riflemen for February 1942 reported:
........During the war years the (American) Rifleman (magazine) (NRA monthly publication) regularly included pleas for American sportsmen to "send a gun to defend a British home.......British civilians, faced with the threat of invasion, desperately need arms for the defense of their homes." Indeed, the New York Times carried the same solicitations. After two decades of gun control, British citizens now desperately needed rifles and pistols in their homes, and they received the gifts with great appreciation. Organized into the Home Guard, armed citizens were now ready to resist the expected Nazi onslaught."


http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/registration_article/registration.html



"The U.S. National Rifle Association collected and shipped large numbers of privately donated rifles for use by the Home Guard. These were collected and destroyed after the war."

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Guard_(United_Kingdom)

Click on "equipment and training"

Then whadahya do ?? You guys fucking destroy the guns we sent you after the war was over ???

It doesn't surprise me anymore that you guys drive on the wrong side of the road. [8D]

Hey brains........ did you miss the part where I gave dates. When I was at school 1940 always came before 1942. You also seem to be having trouble with the words "War was over".... It must have been the four letter word that stumped you...... O-V-E-R

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Got to say I loved the idea of the NRA being used as an unbiased source. [sm=donttaseme.gif]

quote:

: To destroy perfectly good firearms is just about the most illogical, irrational, asinine misguided foolishness there is on the face of the earth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Hey brains........ did you miss the part where I gave dates. When I was at school 1940 always came before 1942. You also seem to be having trouble with the words "War was over".... It must have been the four letter word that stumped you...... O-V-E-R

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

To declare

quote:

: To destroy perfectly good firearms is just about the most illogical, irrational, asinine misguided foolishness there is on the face of the earth.

Is far worse,to any regular person, I would hope.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

To declare

quote:

: To destroy perfectly good firearms is just about the most illogical, irrational, asinine misguided foolishness there is on the face of the earth.

Is far worse,to any regular person, I would hope.

Who died and made you an expert on what a regular person is ? Maybe to you, the collection of firearms, from civilians who were prepared and then ready to sacrifice their lives to defend the country with them, only to destroy them is rational and normal. I disagree. At least they could have sent them back to where they came with a thank you note.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

its called having a opinion...i didnt state anything about the situation, just that the comment was, sadly one of the dumbest Ive seen in a long time, n that is saying something.
can you actually get back to the topic, or are you stuck in the 40s

quote:

USA: 10.3 (no gun control)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Freedomwarf1

The guns didn't come from civillians, they were military supplies, not personal firearms.

quote:

ORIGINAL:



And, by not returning them, we were hoping your gun-toting and illogical obsession with personal firearms might subside and make you see some real common sense.
Sadly, we couldn't do that and since then we see countless thousands every day being slaughtered by civilians with guns.

You only have to compare the numbers (deaths per 100,00 of population) -
UK: 0.25 (strict gun control)
Australia: 1.06 (strict gun control)
USA: 10.3 (no gun control)

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

So the USA is 41x more dangerous with guns than the UK without them.
Take your pick; I know where the more rational decision was

quote:

To destroy perfectly good firearms is just about the most illogical, irrational, asinine misguided foolishness there is on the face of the earth.

quote:

To destroy perfectly good human lives is just about the most illogical, irrational, asinine misguided foolishness there is on the face of the earth.