Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health insurance!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health insurance! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:04:29 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Same problem. It comes down to his freedoms versus mine. What if I want the freedom of not having to subsidize this guy?



You don't want to "subsidize" people that don't want to buy healthcare. I don't want to "subsidize" people who don't want to be bothered to get an education and get a job, so they go on welfare. Whats the difference?

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:04:38 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

........In your opinion, why do the costs for procedures in the US cost so much more than anywhere else?


Because insurance has a stranglehold on healthcare.

When the concept of getting everyone reliable healthcare came up I was all for it. I think the lobbyists got thier claws in and turned a good idea into another spigot for the insurance industry.

I don't like the current healthcare law.

If one is wealthy enough to self-insure (pay cash) for healthcare, great. I don't have a spare $500k for a possible cancer bout, do you?

I don't think carrying a bankbook to show the ER you can pay is viable either.

I wish we could scrap the whole system we have.

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:05:45 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

this idjit whatever his damn name is, is going to court, hoping to get his way and deny others



Deny others putting their hands into his pockets. You do understand, don't you Lucy, that you advocate legalized theft?


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:06:31 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

Well I am willing to pay a lower cost. I finally got through healthcare.gov and am saving over 50% of what I already pay out of pocket and BETTER coverage. I was able to get a dental plan (A REAL ONE) and a health plan. People who need it will not be suing.



Woo Hoo!!!!

This bears repeating!!

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:10:12 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

This guy isn't saying he's opposed to having insurance. He's saying he's opposed being forced to buy insurance. He's opposed to having his freedom to choose infringed, regardless of what his choice would be otherwise.




I really do appreciate the point he is trying to make. If I follow Yachtie's communal materialism thinking, I appreciate the objection of making each person pay for the good of all. Until a better alternative comes along, what are we to do?

< Message edited by hlen5 -- 10/23/2013 11:14:08 AM >


_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:10:14 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

Well I am willing to pay a lower cost. I finally got through healthcare.gov and am saving over 50% of what I already pay out of pocket and BETTER coverage. I was able to get a dental plan (A REAL ONE) and a health plan. People who need it will not be suing.



Woo Hoo!!!!

This bears repeating!!



You're right. Woo Hoo says the guy at the subsidized trough.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:15:55 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

Well I am willing to pay a lower cost. I finally got through healthcare.gov and am saving over 50% of what I already pay out of pocket and BETTER coverage. I was able to get a dental plan (A REAL ONE) and a health plan. People who need it will not be suing.



Woo Hoo!!!!

This bears repeating!!



You're right. Woo Hoo says the guy at the subsidized trough.


We're all paying for it one way or another, aren't we?

PS: Are you implying MY insurance is from the subsidized trough?


_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:27:15 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

Well I am willing to pay a lower cost. I finally got through healthcare.gov and am saving over 50% of what I already pay out of pocket and BETTER coverage. I was able to get a dental plan (A REAL ONE) and a health plan. People who need it will not be suing.



Woo Hoo!!!!

This bears repeating!!



You're right. Woo Hoo says the guy at the subsidized trough.


We're all paying for it one way or another, aren't we?

PS: Are you implying MY insurance is from the subsidized trough?




"Says the guy." Are you the guy?

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:28:38 AM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
could you pease define what you mean by "subsequent crime that will ensue?"

I'm saying your first option... an otherwise moral person when pushed to extreme will become immoral. Let me just sign myself right up for that. If I had freely chosen to not buy medical insurance and my wife was dying I'd do whatever I could, legal or otherwise, in an attempt to save her.

I guess the question for me is this, should we all give up some of our liberty, our freedom of choice, because some small percantage of people MIGHT commit desperate acts? please do keep in mind, this factor, when this all began they claimed there were some 30 milion people uninsured, that roughly 10% of the population, if 1/2 of those people end up in this desperate situation, (come on we can't assume EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO GET CANCER) and then 1/2 of those people choose to commit a desperate act you are left with 2.5% of the population that MIGHT commit a desperate act.
That's not bad. I can live with that. So we turn down care to those without insurance and deal with whatever negative repercussions in terms of desperate acts might result. So I'd be fine with removing the mandate part of this so long as we also remove any mandate or expectation that a hospital provide emergency room treatment for the uninsured.

you people want a SOLUTION, well there it is, what are they going to do if 100 million people swamp local police stations.
First of all, I'm not sure who "you people" are in this context. But yeah, I personally like answers to be thought out beyond step 1. That being said, I like your answer... granted, I prefer a more humane answer but I can live with the "let them die in the streets" option. The simple answer to your next question is the same reasoning as you provided.... we will handle the law breakers by trying and convicting them. We will build prisons as required to hold the criminals in question. I find it debatable that 100 million people would choose to go to prison as you yourself would. I would hope that those with children would consider options other than prison.

you all want to pretend that this isn't JUST THE BEGINING of gov't forcing us to do whateve they want, but I guarentee you if you had asked my gandfather when he was alive if THIS could EVER EVER HAPPEN in the USA, he would have LAUGHED AT YOU!
Again, I'm a bit unclear who "you all" are in this sentence but I detect a bit of foaming at the mouth. Does it help you any to know that I agree with the idea of limited government intrusion? I'm fine with ripping away all the social safety nets so long as we do it openly and with eyes open regarding the consequences.

you probably think thats JUST AS FUNNY as my gandpa would have thought OBAMACARE is!
no, I don't think it's funny in an era where we have abrogated the rule of law entirely and massive and massively intrusive state surveillance of EVERYONE is the norm. What I do think is pretty funny though is your own ideological blinders and the ensuing mouth foaming. Now I have another question since your'e so big on personal freedom. I would like the freedom to not bomb random other nations and not pay for the military infrastructure required to do so. In your vision of proper government should I have the option of opting out of that and similar programs (like say the NSA and DHS as a whole) that I personally find distasteful?

I personally think that might be very interesting. I've often wondered what would happen if we presented a simplified budget at the end of your tax form where citizens could individually assign percentages of their taxes for different categories. Then the individuals would be able to say "here's how I want my money spent" and if war and killing people was attractive enough we'd do it. Otherwise, we wouldn't. Ditto with everything else.

The only thing I'd exempt from that would be things like SSI where it really IS an entitlement (eg: we all paid for it already therefore we are entitled to it).

ok just to clarify, in the first instance you people, refered to those opposed to obamacare

you go on to say I'd hope people would not chose prison,
let me relate a lil personal experince to you...

in 1976 I attended a "smoke in" in wash DC I don't know how many people actually showed up, but it was ALOT, everyone smoked pot on the whitehouse steps, NO ONE was actually arrested, simply put, there wasn't enough jail space to put thousands of people. even though they OPENLY defied federal law..

its not going to happen because people now just shrug thier shoulders and say, there isn't anything I can do about it. but if it DID HAPPEN, there would be no MASS ARRESTS, not new prisons built etc etc etc

the main reason being if say 100 million people showed up and they were all arrested it would DEVASTATE the economy and thus the tax base
they may be assholes but they aren't THAT STUPID

in the second instance, you all, refers to the people who defend obamacare and the mandate as being a neccisary evil an then laugh when someone says "THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING"

politicians are like anyone else, once they KNOW they can get aways with something, they WILL push the limits as far as they can...

I once worked for a company that did nothing but install water heaters, small company basicly ME installing and the owner who did advertising and collections etc etc etc

my wife had a company retreat where she worked and I told the boss I am going on this retreat I'll be gone for a few days, nothing was said about it until the day before it was time for me to go and I was told YOU CANNOT GO!
well I WENT, and when I got back I was told I am fired return the waters heaters to my house, so I went there and unloaded the heaters on my truck and told the guy, this is bullshit, I gave you plenty of notice to find someone to fill in for me for a couple days, and when I was sick and in the hospital I found someone to take care of bussiness while I was in the hopsital and I left... next day he calls me back and say OK you can have your job back, I looked at my wife and said, thats it, he'll NEVER try to fire me again, I can now basicly do ANYTHING I WANT, because he KNOWS he needs ME more than I need him!

same principle as a BULLY, once you whimp out to him he will NEVER STOP! and he will ALWAYS take more and more until it sooo untolerable you take some definate action

you HAVE TO FIGHT THE LITTLE BATTLES just so they KNOW you WILL NOT BE PUSHED, if you concede the LIL ONES, they will ALWAYS go for MORE AN MORE!

alot of people here seem to think the republicas are DEAD, well they are NOT, they may be weak at the moment but trust me ONE DAY the dems will screw up reallly bad and suddenly the repibs will be BACK, and if they are 1/2 a EVIL as some people say they are ohhh my godddd what the fuck do you think they are going to DO with this NEW FOUND POWER!

you all (obamacare supporters) have told the gov't so long as you can claim its a TAX, you can pretty much force us to do whatever you want

WOE to the people who threw this in the republicans face when THEY GET THIER TURN!

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 10/23/2013 11:33:23 AM >

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 11:31:25 AM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie
Boy, is that a tough one for many to swallow.

Not for me. Actually, this is the first time I can ever recall hearing a conservative person espousing such things come right out and say, "then they die". That's always been my rub with positions that remove social safety nets... the next logical step met total silence. Now, I get it that this particular proposal isn't removing anything. It's merely not mandating it. But still, the problems will remain the same. People will make foolish decisions and then it'll be time to pay the piper.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:01:10 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
People will make foolish decisions and then it'll be time to pay the piper.


People always do. By what right does anyone interfere with them? See, that's kinda the crux of the problem. You might think it foolish for your neighbor to allow their 16 year old daughter to take the car out. You may actually be right. But, look at the people who are more than willing to occupy that position of playing God. People who are as foolish as anyone else, and they'll defend to the death their ability to do so.


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:29:23 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
........In your opinion, why do the costs for procedures in the US cost so much more than anywhere else?

Because insurance has a stranglehold on healthcare.
When the concept of getting everyone reliable healthcare came up I was all for it. I think the lobbyists got thier claws in and turned a good idea into another spigot for the insurance industry.
I don't like the current healthcare law.
If one is wealthy enough to self-insure (pay cash) for healthcare, great. I don't have a spare $500k for a possible cancer bout, do you?
I don't think carrying a bankbook to show the ER you can pay is viable either.
I wish we could scrap the whole system we have.


You're blaming insurance companies for the cost of health care. How so? And, how is Obamacare going to break that hold?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:34:19 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

What I see is a blithering idiot who has been so propagandized that he is participating in a lawsuit meant to deny other people affordable health care.


Put another way, he's participating in a lawsuit meant to preserve his own right to choose. Not to be forced into choice(s) he does not want to make.

You extreme leftists only see it one way. You're the ones who have drunk the kool-aid.


He can choose to not get insurance. He just has to pay $12 a month instead of the $18 he'd pay for insurance. If that $6 is that vital to him he's welcome to go without and if $144 a year is too much then he can simply arrange things so he never is owed an income tax refund since the penalty can only be subtracted from a federal tax return and collected by no other means.

Like I said he's an idiot who has watched FNC too much.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:38:17 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Because when you or some other freedom loving person not wearing a seatbelt is in a crash the costs of cleaning your brains off the road are tax money and we, as a society, would like to not have those expenses.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:39:16 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
This guy isn't saying he's opposed to having insurance. He's saying he's opposed being forced to buy insurance. He's opposed to having his freedom to choose infringed, regardless of what his choice would be otherwise.

I really do appreciate the point he is trying to make. If I follow Yachtie's communal materialism thinking, I appreciate the objection of making each person pay for the good of all. Until a better alternative comes along, what are we to do?


How about not make a change for the worse? People (not pointing at anyone specific) piss and moan about having to subsidize charity ER care. Um, that means it's being paid for by those who buy insurance, right? So, it's already being paid for. People are bitching that insurance costs too much, and part of that is because it has to subsidize those who don't have insurance. Well, guess what. The cost of insurance has gone up and is going to keep going up because of the current health care laws. Now, you have to buy insurance and some are having to pay an extra tax, to subsidize the purchase of insurance for others. So, the change is only what is being subsidized. Either we're subsidizing charity care through the purchase of insurance, or we're subsidizing the purchase of insurance through higher premiums and, for some, an extra tax.

Seems like we're not actually going forward at all, doesn't it?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:45:19 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

Well I am willing to pay a lower cost. I finally got through healthcare.gov and am saving over 50% of what I already pay out of pocket and BETTER coverage. I was able to get a dental plan (A REAL ONE) and a health plan. People who need it will not be suing.



Woo Hoo!!!!

This bears repeating!!



You're right. Woo Hoo says the guy at the subsidized trough.


We're all paying for it one way or another, aren't we?

PS: Are you implying MY insurance is from the subsidized trough?




"Says the guy." Are you the guy?


No, but I said woo-hoo, not Sweet Anise, who I thought was a gal.


_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:46:29 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Because when you or some other freedom loving person not wearing a seatbelt is in a crash the costs of cleaning your brains off the road are tax money and we, as a society, would like to not have those expenses.


Give me a break.

I pay taxes for that shit, too.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 12:47:26 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Because when you or some other freedom loving person not wearing a seatbelt is in a crash the costs of cleaning your brains off the road are tax money and we, as a society, would like to not have those expenses.


Give me a break.

I pay taxes for that shit, too.

So? Do you not understand that society as a whole makes these decisions not you by yourself?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 1:00:17 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Because when you or some other freedom loving person not wearing a seatbelt is in a crash the costs of cleaning your brains off the road are tax money and we, as a society, would like to not have those expenses.

Give me a break.
I pay taxes for that shit, too.

So? Do you not understand that society as a whole makes these decisions not you by yourself?


So?!? So, I'm paying for people to do their jobs. If your job includes scraping brains off the road, then, do your job.

That guy is likely to be working cleaning up the mess from the wreck anyway, isn't he? Seat belt or not, there is typically quite a mess after an accident.

Society as a whole? Nope. Majority rule can only do so much. This is one of the reasons the US Constitution is considered a chain on the government.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health ... - 10/23/2013 2:33:08 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Let me give you another example, Jeff. Let's take seat belt laws. In Ohio, you can be pulled over for not wearing a seat belt while driving. That is against the law. Why? Why can one decide whether to wear a seat belt or not, without having Big Brother threatening with fines and/or other sanctions?

Because when you or some other freedom loving person not wearing a seatbelt is in a crash the costs of cleaning your brains off the road are tax money and we, as a society, would like to not have those expenses.

Give me a break.
I pay taxes for that shit, too.

So? Do you not understand that society as a whole makes these decisions not you by yourself?


So?!? So, I'm paying for people to do their jobs. If your job includes scraping brains off the road, then, do your job.

That guy is likely to be working cleaning up the mess from the wreck anyway, isn't he? Seat belt or not, there is typically quite a mess after an accident.

Society as a whole? Nope. Majority rule can only do so much. This is one of the reasons the US Constitution is considered a chain on the government.


Beyond the fact that the LEO's that do accident cleanup much prefer not to have to deal with bodies, is the simple fact that a death investigation is a lot more expensive and time consuming than a simple accident with restrained people.

This is a case, exactly like the ACA, where the majority can require certain behavior by all to facilitate the functioning of society.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Suing over not wanting to pay $18/month for health insurance! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109