RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/25/2013 4:02:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

That's real funny you guys. I might have been upset if you had come up with an intelligent and logical argument against the Tea Party instead of just making up all that stupid or filthy shit.


logical argument against the nutsackers?nobody was against the Tea Party before the Koch boys took it over. The Tea Party was co-opted by ignoramuses. The teabaggers are fucking untutored lying cretins. what arguments beyond that are necessary?




lovmuffin -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/25/2013 4:51:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
That's real funny you guys. I might have been upset if you had come up with an intelligent and logical argument against the Tea Party instead of just making up all that stupid or filthy shit.


To be fair, the Tea Party originally called themselves "tea baggers" because they were using tea bags for the symbolism. They did not know the sexual connotation of "tea bagging," though, and quickly distanced themselves from the moniker once they found out.

One of these posters has a picture that shows an older lady with a sign that says something to the effect of "tea bagging for Jesus." It's truly hilarious.

Unfortunately for those whose beliefs sometimes do align with the Tea Party, they did start calling themselves tea baggers.



I get it and I didn't know the sexual connotation either until now. I only recently learned what a nut-(something I can't say because it's in violation of TOS-er) is and it sounds like nut sacker except there's a different vowel in place of the "a", and I think pretty much means the same thing, but still, using nut sacker or that other similar TOS violation of a term is taking teabagger out of its context and equivalent to a typical 4th grade school yard insult like poopy face. I guess that's the best they can do.

When I think about it though, I wish I could have been there when that lady with the sign found out the other meaning for tea bagger.
That is funny.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/25/2013 8:04:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
I get it and I didn't know the sexual connotation either until now. I only recently learned what a nut-(something I can't say because it's in violation of TOS-er) is and it sounds like nut sacker except there's a different vowel in place of the "a", and I think pretty much means the same thing, but still, using nut sacker or that other similar TOS violation of a term is taking teabagger out of its context and equivalent to a typical 4th grade school yard insult like poopy face. I guess that's the best they can do.
When I think about it though, I wish I could have been there when that lady with the sign found out the other meaning for tea bagger.
That is funny.


I'm surprised it hasn't been posted again on this thread.

Some people can do nothing but cast aspersions against those they don't agree with. I didn't know what the connotation was, either, until some started mocking them. I had to look it up.




mnottertail -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 4:04:24 AM)

Yeah it aint a matter of dont agree with them. First they are fucking inept, secondly they are ignorant, thirdly they know nothing of the constitution, fourthly they must lie in every case to further their agenda. There is more, but even the Nazi party had more connection to thought and truth than the nutsackers.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 5:38:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yeah it aint a matter of dont agree with them. First they are fucking inept, secondly they are ignorant, thirdly they know nothing of the constitution, fourthly they must lie in every case to further their agenda. There is more, but even the Nazi party had more connection to thought and truth than the nutsackers.


Thank you for making my point, MN.




mnottertail -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 7:06:19 AM)

You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?

Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.

Thanks for making my point.






DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 8:03:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.


You already made my point, MN. No need to continue on.




mnottertail -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 8:20:03 AM)

exactly, I don't see any reason to publicize the nutsackers, who are about the stupidest fucks to ever live on the earth. As I say, you've made my point,and I yours... and since we are in such agreement, it only ends up to be us preaching to the choir. So yes, lets leave off.




lovmuffin -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 10:27:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.


You already made my point, MN. No need to continue on.



Now I get it, nutsackers are the borrow and spend liberals.





DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 1:27:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.

You already made my point, MN. No need to continue on.

Now I get it, nutsackers are the borrow and spend liberals.


You could say that, but MN won't. I don't use the term, so I don't have to define how I use it. Works out well that way. [:D]




lovmuffin -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 1:51:40 PM)

I don't use it either though I sick of seeing it. I can certainly define, in more ways than one, how I perceive it. [8D]




DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 1:57:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
I don't use it either though I sick of seeing it. I can certainly define, in more ways than one, how I perceive it. [8D]


lol

I understand completely. But, just like with just about any other thing, you can't really control anyone but yourself.




lovmuffin -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 2:28:23 PM)

Yep, and your logic is excellent, the same as your signature lines.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 2:55:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Yep, and your logic is excellent, the same as your signature lines.


Grazie!




Phydeaux -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 5:14:38 PM)

Another 500,000 people likely to lose coverage in California, revealed today:

http://blog.sfgate.com/djsaunders/2013/10/25/half-a-milllion-californians-could-lose-their-health-care-under-obamacare-next-year/




tazzygirl -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/26/2013 10:59:27 PM)

The same Kaiser that you claimed was a liberal organization?

So let me get this straight. You are more concerned about the 500K who may lose their private, grandfathered insurance policies ....

Perspective, thats 1.3% of California's total population - But lets cut out the almost 3 million in that state that are illegal - Now we are at 1.4%

...... instead of the 22% who have no insurance at all?




Phydeaux -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/27/2013 2:57:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The same Kaiser that you claimed was a liberal organization?

So let me get this straight. You are more concerned about the 500K who may lose their private, grandfathered insurance policies ....

Perspective, thats 1.3% of California's total population - But lets cut out the almost 3 million in that state that are illegal - Now we are at 1.4%

...... instead of the 22% who have no insurance at all?



LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Well that's an interesting way to frame the argument. So let me turn it around on you.

No tizzy. I'm concerned that OBAMACARE is adding to the ranks of the uninsured.
And its pretty much a given that there will be MORE uninsured 1 year from now than there is now.


Some entirely predictable (and yet never predicted issues:

-Enrollment targets - you know 30 million - now 7 million will not sign up by the deadline.
-Enrollment targets of youths will not hit the 2.7 million target.
-Premiums will be significantly higher in the following year.
-Delayes in the backed with fuck the IRS in determining coverage and eligibility.

Families are going to be spending 50% more on healthcare - meaning they won't be spending it on other things.
Huge explosion in the numbers of patients going to medicare doctors - but... there aren't any more medicare profiders than last year. What do you think that will do to wait times.




tazzygirl -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/27/2013 3:45:43 AM)

quote:

No tizzy. I'm concerned that OBAMACARE is adding to the ranks of the uninsured.
And its pretty much a given that there will be MORE uninsured 1 year from now than there is now.


Do you have such poor manners that you cant spell even a nic on line correctly?

Here is the disconnect from your side "of the isle".

Bitched for years that "healthcare" shouldnt be free.

Sees now it isnt.

Still bitching because you havent run the figures yourself.

quote:

Families are going to be spending 50% more on healthcare - meaning they won't be spending it on other things.
Huge explosion in the numbers of patients going to medicare doctors - but... there aren't any more medicare profiders than last year. What do you think that will do to wait times.


Neither of which are proven. And definitely not the truth in my case. I waited 5 months to see a surgeon for my ankle. 5 months JUST for the initial appointment, made by my PCP, of which payment was never in question.

Wait times? We already got em. You want to complain about wait times? Really? I can call monday morning and be seen monday after for a sick call. If I am not sick, I dont need same day service, now do I? Think that might actually get Congress off their asses to open up the enrollments for residency programs?

Hmmm... gee.




thishereboi -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/27/2013 8:52:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah it aint a matter of dont agree with them. First they are fucking inept, secondly they are ignorant, thirdly they know nothing of the constitution, fourthly they must lie in every case to further their agenda. There is more, but even the Nazi party had more connection to thought and truth than the nutsackers.



A valid description of the democratic party, to bad so many people can't see it.




tazzygirl -> RE: Pink Slips for Health Insurance (10/27/2013 9:33:09 AM)

Get off the high horse. Its a valid discription of the GOP - Tea Party especially. Both have the problems with all those points. And yet how many Republican sponsored bills, made into laws, have been overturned on appeals?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375