RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 5:21:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
By not allowing the US government to negotiate prices on those massive buys of drugs.  That is nutsackers wasting other peoples money.........mine and yours, making healthcare more expensive than need be, and crippling the system  and seriously infringing on our citizenry's freedoms, as they are wont to do to corporate benefit.


OMFG, that is fucking hilarious!

Costs for medications has dropped for Medicare patients. Isn't that what it's about? When costs drop, isn't that making it "more affordable?"

You are coming out against the Government subsidizing drug costs so beneficiaries can save money, but are for government subsidizing insurance costs so those that don't make as much can save money while getting insurance.

Obamacare is making health care more expensive, too, or haven't you heard?




Owner59 -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 5:38:48 AM)

So you`re not aware that the gop passed a law saying we couldn`t use our buying power to negotiate for better prices or you just willfully ignoring empirical facts again?


We`ve also heard about the death panels ,etc. so excuse us if we don`t believe your BS today.....



The ACA has already saved consumers billions.....look it up.....just google those words and become enlightened.




thishereboi -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 5:54:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

So you`re not aware that the gop passed a law saying we couldn`t use our buying power to negotiate for better prices or you just willfully ignoring empirical facts again?


We`ve also heard about the death panels ,etc. so excuse us if we don`t believe your BS today.....



The ACA has already saved consumers billions.....look it up.....just google those words and become enlightened.


That's good. They will need all that money to buy new policies since the POTUS lied about keeping the old ones.




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 6:02:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
By not allowing the US government to negotiate prices on those massive buys of drugs.  That is nutsackers wasting other peoples money.........mine and yours, making healthcare more expensive than need be, and crippling the system  and seriously infringing on our citizenry's freedoms, as they are wont to do to corporate benefit.


OMFG, that is fucking hilarious!

Costs for medications has dropped for Medicare patients. Isn't that what it's about? When costs drop, isn't that making it "more affordable?"

You are coming out against the Government subsidizing drug costs so beneficiaries can save money, but are for government subsidizing insurance costs so those that don't make as much can save money while getting insurance.

Obamacare is making health care more expensive, too, or haven't you heard?



Not as fuckin hilarious that any fucking imbecile slobbering.

Where are medicare drug costs dropping? (credible citations, somebody is paying the full boat on the motherfucker)
Where the fuck do you get I am for subsidizing insurance? (I do not, I want single payer nationalized healthcare, I am for that subsidy, period). Anything that gets us there is a necessary evil, but I am not 'FOR' it, whatsoever.

Spouting frantic geysers of profound stupidity is not gonna get you any girls, pal.





Arturas -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 6:41:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

No the topic wasnt moved, your woman bit when I gave figures bout people not paying taxes(again her derail) from post 207 onwards with her ridiculous claims.


I like her post. By "bite" you mean she answered your question? I'm not sure what the issue is with that. As far as describing her post as "ridiculous" if one does not agree with them, it does not matter to us.

apart from the fact she gave the completely wrong answer, i dislike wilful ignorance, and their cheerleaders.



I find her answer absolutely correct and I will take her to dinner tonight to show her how pleased I am. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.




Arturas -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 6:42:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

W failed to defend us and made us look weak to the rest of the world: 9/11/2001
W failed to provide for the general welfare by crippling etc. the health care system by his Medicare part D.
W FAILED TO TELL THE TRUTH on Iraq, on whether he was pursuing OBL, on the Katrina response and on numerous other events during his term.

So once again can you back up the fact that you really hated W? ]


I'm very sure the World never thought W weak even on 9/11.

Of course someone in the world did. Otherwise there would have been no attack.
quote:

The Health Care system is not crippled until now.

It was far more crippled. You simply were not affected. One of the biggest things Obama has done is fix part D.
quote:

W never lied about Iraq, he made a call based on the info he had, it's what we paid him to do.

He lied about the yellowcake. He sent Powell to the UN with material he knew to be untrue. He lied about "Mission Accomplished"

BTW it is on topic you made a bunch of bullshit claims that apply more to W than Obama so I pointed that out just to maybe get through to the ODS sufferers.


No.




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 6:53:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

No the topic wasnt moved, your woman bit when I gave figures bout people not paying taxes(again her derail) from post 207 onwards with her ridiculous claims.


I like her post. By "bite" you mean she answered your question? I'm not sure what the issue is with that. As far as describing her post as "ridiculous" if one does not agree with them, it does not matter to us.

apart from the fact she gave the completely wrong answer, i dislike wilful ignorance, and their cheerleaders.



I find her answer absolutely correct and I will take her to dinner tonight to show her how pleased I am. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.


Yup, reminds me; gotta go slop the hogs, myself.




Arturas -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:07:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

No the topic wasnt moved, your woman bit when I gave figures bout people not paying taxes(again her derail) from post 207 onwards with her ridiculous claims.


I like her post. By "bite" you mean she answered your question? I'm not sure what the issue is with that. As far as describing her post as "ridiculous" if one does not agree with them, it does not matter to us.

apart from the fact she gave the completely wrong answer, i dislike wilful ignorance, and their cheerleaders.



I find her answer absolutely correct and I will take her to dinner tonight to show her how pleased I am. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.


Yup, reminds me; gotta go slop the hogs, myself.


Different strokes.
Enjoy.




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:22:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
So you`re not aware that the gop passed a law saying we couldn`t use our buying power to negotiate for better prices or you just willfully ignoring empirical facts again?
We`ve also heard about the death panels ,etc. so excuse us if we don`t believe your BS today.....
The ACA has already saved consumers billions.....look it up.....just google those words and become enlightened.


Empirical facts?

So much for using an NIH.gov study... [8|]






mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:32:58 AM)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517993/




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:37:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
By not allowing the US government to negotiate prices on those massive buys of drugs.  That is nutsackers wasting other peoples money.........mine and yours, making healthcare more expensive than need be, and crippling the system  and seriously infringing on our citizenry's freedoms, as they are wont to do to corporate benefit.

OMFG, that is fucking hilarious!
Costs for medications has dropped for Medicare patients. Isn't that what it's about? When costs drop, isn't that making it "more affordable?"
You are coming out against the Government subsidizing drug costs so beneficiaries can save money, but are for government subsidizing insurance costs so those that don't make as much can save money while getting insurance.
Obamacare is making health care more expensive, too, or haven't you heard?

Not as fuckin hilarious that any fucking imbecile slobbering.
Where are medicare drug costs dropping? (credible citations, somebody is paying the full boat on the motherfucker)


NIH.gov study isn't credible enough, eh?

quote:

Where the fuck do you get I am for subsidizing insurance? (I do not, I want single payer nationalized healthcare, I am for that subsidy, period). Anything that gets us there is a necessary evil, but I am not 'FOR' it, whatsoever.
Spouting frantic geysers of profound stupidity is not gonna get you any girls, pal.


Where do I get that you are for subsidizing insurance? Um, are you or are you not supportive of Obamacare?

Just an FYI, I'm neither spouting frantic geysers of profound stupidity, nor am I participating on this board to get girls. Maybe that's why you're here, but, as arturas said, "different strokes..."




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:46:34 AM)

NIH.gov study isn't credible enough, eh?

I gave you an NIH study,  You dont quite understand economics even at a counting the pile of logs in kindergarden.

As an FYI, don't know that you are participating, there is no evidence of that, and if you don't get it, then you aint ever likely to get nothing.  I have said what I said about these subjects, if you are unable to comprehend, then when you say, insofar as you are innocently ignorant: 'so you are for.............'
or 
insofar as you are mendaciously ignorant 'are you saying......'





DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:49:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517993/


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696956
    quote:

    Conclusions: The introduction of Medicare Part D was associated with reductions in Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications, particularly in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage, and did not substantially change expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries who previously received pharmacy coverage through Medicaid. However, a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries.


It saved beneficiaries money, just like I said it did.

Your link does not dispute that.

Now, any proof that the "health care system" has been "crippled" by Medicare Part D?




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 7:51:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
NIH.gov study isn't credible enough, eh?
I gave you an NIH study,  You dont quite understand economics even at a counting the pile of logs in kindergarden.


To be fair, I was making my response while you posted yours, so it wasn't seen until after I had posted.

quote:

As an FYI, don't know that you are participating, there is no evidence of that, and if you don't get it, then you aint ever likely to get nothing.  I have said what I said about these subjects, if you are unable to comprehend, then when you say, insofar as you are innocently ignorant: 'so you are for.............'
or 
insofar as you are mendaciously ignorant 'are you saying......'


Thank you for a beautiful example of the "geyser of profound stupidity."




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 8:08:16 AM)

It saved beneficiaries money, just like I said it did.
Your link does not dispute that.
Now, any proof that the "health care system" has been "crippled" by Medicare Part D?

well, a goddamn commie, I would have never thought.  Any proof that you are not a fuckin commie, because you sure want to throw away my money to corporations  I didnt save a fuckin dime of it,

Now, you have proof that at least 21 billion that is thrown away on non negotiable drug costs yearly is not crippling healthcare, cuz a good crutch for that withered leg would be to stick it into healthcare.




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 8:18:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
It saved beneficiaries money, just like I said it did.
Your link does not dispute that.
Now, any proof that the "health care system" has been "crippled" by Medicare Part D?
well, a goddamn commie, I would have never thought.  Any proof that you are not a fuckin commie, because you sure want to throw away my money to corporations  I didnt save a fuckin dime of it,
Now, you have proof that at least 21 billion that is thrown away on non negotiable drug costs yearly is not crippling healthcare, cuz a good crutch for that withered leg would be to stick it into healthcare.


Nice attempt at a deflection, MN. But, it should serve for others to note that you have no proof that my claim is incorrect.

Any proof that health care in the US has been crippled by Part D? Noting that costs could have been lower for Government certainly isn't proof of "crippling."




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 9:10:34 AM)

When stupid internet postings couldnt possibly get stupider, surprise, they do.

You have no proof that your claim is correct.




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 9:12:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
When stupid internet postings couldnt possibly get stupider, surprise, they do.
You have no proof that your claim is correct.


The NIH study isn't credible proof?




mnottertail -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 9:27:08 AM)

Nope.

Your claim in its entirety is prima facie lie.

quote:


Costs for medications has dropped for Medicare patients. Isn't that what it's about? When costs drop, isn't that making it "more affordable?"



the conclusion, snipped for brevity but not taken out of context:

...was associated with reductions in Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications, particularly in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage...  However, a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries...

That does not prove that they did not pay more in taxes to make up the difference.

out-of-pocket only. that is the finding of the study.  If you cannot make the connection that 21 BILLION or more could be put into healthcare that is going to pharma now, and as a consequence, those peoples out-of-pocket would also drop dramatically,  then you cannot make the connection that costs for medication have dropped.  They haven't, only out-of-pocket costs, for those people, particularly in beneficiaries that had no previous drug coverage.   

Which is not by any stretch more affordable (no proof of that claim and actual wonderment in the conclusions of that claim), no proof that is what it is all about,  nor by any stretch empirical fact that it saved beneficiaries money.  (those questions were not studied only wondered at).



So, there you have it.  Thank you for a beautiful example of geysers of profound stupidity.




DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 10:19:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Nope.
Your claim in its entirety is prima facie lie.
quote:

Costs for medications has dropped for Medicare patients. Isn't that what it's about? When costs drop, isn't that making it "more affordable?"

the conclusion, snipped for brevity but not taken out of context:
...was associated with reductions in Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications, particularly in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage...  However, a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries...
That does not prove that they did not pay more in taxes to make up the difference.
out-of-pocket only. that is the finding of the study.  If you cannot make the connection that 21 BILLION or more could be put into healthcare that is going to pharma now, and as a consequence, those peoples out-of-pocket would also drop dramatically,  then you cannot make the connection that costs for medication have dropped.  They haven't, only out-of-pocket costs, for those people, particularly in beneficiaries that had no previous drug coverage.   
Which is not by any stretch more affordable (no proof of that claim and actual wonderment in the conclusions of that claim), no proof that is what it is all about,  nor by any stretch empirical fact that it saved beneficiaries money.  (those questions were not studied only wondered at).
So, there you have it. 


Any credible citation that increased taxes paid by the seniors outweighed the cost savings on medications? I know you don't.

quote:

Thank you for a beautiful example of geysers of profound stupidity.


You're welcome, but, to give credit where credit is due, my examples are just quotes of yours. I can't truly take credit for your geysers of profound stupidity. [:D]




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 [14] 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875