|
DesideriScuri -> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! (11/6/2013 10:56:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yes, I have it, it is in their conclusion. Learn to read. geysers of stupidity and so on.
a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries...
do the math, hpcoppc-slfbdbb = TAXES or revenues of some type. What proof do you have that these folks on medicare were seniors? Quit augering yourself in here. Moving the goalposts, and introducing more proofless nothings into the factless claims.
More geysers. I get it, MN. You can stop with the examples.
My link, my NIH link, concluded that beneficiaries of Medicare Part D had a reduction in the cost of medications they bought. This is my claim, supported by a NIH link I provided.
You, apparently, have a problem with Medicare Part D not because the beneficiaries saved money on medication (ie. purchasing medication was more affordable), but that the costs were simply shifted onto taxpayers without sensible cost containment (let alone cost-cutting) provisions? Did I get that right?
You are also supportive of Obamacare, which, shock of all shocks (not), simply shifts costs onto taxpayers without sensible cost containment (let alone cost-cutting) provisions.
|
|
|
|
