Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: OBAMA LIED!!!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 9:12:27 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

This thng is clearly meant to fail....

Of course it is...the Dems plan all along has been single-payer, Federal government, healthcare.

And what, pray, is wrong with a government funded single-payer healthcare system?
Everywhere that type of system is implimented it works out shitloads cheaper for the patient than private insurance-based systems.
Surely that would be better for the majority of Americans?


First, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about "bait and switch"?
Second, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about "What government giveth. government can taketh."?
Third, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about the VA healthcare system (government single-payer) being far inferior to the civilian healthcare system (private multi-payer)?
Surely that (the VA system) would not be better for the majority of Americans.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 9:23:10 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
So, the whole idea that you could keep your plan if you like it was not true, except for the first year (while it was grandfathered). The Administration knew this stuff, but continued to peddle the line.

That, Ken, is what we call a lie.

No. If you had a plan and it did not change at all you can keep it indefinitely. However the insurance companies never leave a plan alone so eventually they change it enough that the grandfathering no longer applies. However that is entirely up to the insurance companies. If they wanted you to be able to keep your plan they could leave it alone, they are aware of the law after all. Blaming this on the President is bullshit.

And keep in mind the changes that remove the grandfathered status are all changes that negatively affect the policy holder.

Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 9:26:10 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
First, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about "bait and switch"?
Second, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about "What government giveth. government can taketh."?
Third, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about the VA healthcare system (government single-payer) being far inferior to the civilian healthcare system (private multi-payer)?
Surely that (the VA system) would not be better for the majority of Americans.

I know what bait and switch is. I don't see that being played out here as a comparison.
Second, that is exactly what happens. Why are you so afraid of this power?
I have no idea what the VA system is as I don't live in the US.

And as I mentioned, in most places where a nationally funded single-payer system is in place is it far cheaper than any of the insurance-based private systems for the patient. Can you disprove that?
I am not comparing VA with any other single-payer system because, from what little I understand of it, it is far inferiour to a general single payer system that is in use elsewhere in the world.

What you have over there in the VA system is nothing like what most other nationally funded single-payer systems are like.

ETA: I just had a brief look at the VA system.
Wiki says -
Overall Evaluation
"Patients routinely rank the veterans system above the alternatives, according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index." In 2008, the VHA got a satisfaction rating of 85 for inpatient treatment, compared with 77 for private hospitals. In the same report the VHA outpatient care scored 3 points higher than for private hospitals.
"As compared with the Medicare fee-for-service program, the VA performed significantly better on all 11 similar quality indicators for the period from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, the VA outperformed Medicare on 12 of 13 indicators."
A study that compared VHA with commercial managed care systems in their treatment of diabetes patients found that in all seven measures of quality, the VHA provided better care.
A RAND Corporation study in 2004 concluded that the VHA outperforms all other sectors of American health care in 294 measures of quality; Patients from the VHA scored significantly higher for adjusted overall quality, chronic disease care, and preventive care, but not for acute care.
A 2009 Congressional Budget Office report on the VHA found that "the care provided to VHA patients compares favorably with that provided to non-VHA patients in terms of compliance with widely recognized clinical guidelines — particularly those that VHA has emphasized in its internal performance measurement system. Such research is complicated by the fact that most users of VHA's services receive at least part of their care from outside providers."
A Harvard Medical School-led study shows that cancer care provided by the Veterans Health Administration for men 65 years and older is at least as good as, and by some measures better than, Medicare-funded fee-for-service care obtained through the private sector.
VA Mental Health Services
Quality of care at the VA was shown to be better than the private sector. The VA had a higher level of performance then the private sector for 7 out of 9 indicators. In fact, they "exceeded private plan performance by large margins."
Patients did not indicate improvement in their conditions. However, they had a very favorable opinions of their care.

So it would appear that the bad-mouthed VA system, as bad as it is, actually out-stripped the private insurance system by a long margin on many fronts.
And you want to keep that private system??


< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 10/30/2013 10:22:20 AM >

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 9:29:15 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 9:39:27 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Name one politician in the history of mankind who did not lie. Lieing is why they became politicians.

No POTUS in history has lied about so many things as the current one. PERIOD!

strange that Cheney has already had to cancel 2 trips to Toronto in the past three years, and this years trip to Toronto, has calls for him to be arrested for war crimes...when he arrives for another visit
The same for his boss.... who lied, practically every day of his era of error. Calls for his arrests still go on if they give out his plans to speak outside the US.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 10:52:02 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.


Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 10:55:46 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.


Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.


Again, the policies only lost grandfather status if they failed to come into compliance with the ACA or raised premiums while eliminating coverage. Simply obeying the ACA regs is not sufficient!

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 10:58:06 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

And what, pray, is wrong with a government funded single-payer healthcare system?
Everywhere that type of system is implimented it works out shitloads cheaper for the patient than private insurance-based systems.
Surely that would be better for the majority of Americans?


No, actually it wouldn't be better cuz the US govt fucks up everything they do and they would fuck up a single payer system too..


This is a popular GOP talking point, which makes me wonder why any of them bother getting elected or pushing for any new legislation if they really think it's all just going to fail anyway.

But please, tell me how Social Security fucks up everything it does. How our National Parks fuck up everything they do. How the Department of Energy fucks up everything they do to protect our nuclear resources. How the FDA fucks up everything it does to make sure our food is safe to eat. How the NIH fucks up all the medical research it does.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 11:02:54 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and I always thought the IRS was pretty good at getting taxes out of you.....just sayin.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 11:12:30 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.

Is that true for every policy out there on the books Desi??

From what little I've seen, not every single policy needed a change that moved it into the "didn't quailfy" bracket. That doesn't mean the insurance companies didn't take advantage of the situation and change more than was absolutely necessary just to make an alternative that also demanded higher premiums for their customers.

The reason I say that is because our 'nam vet friend in NC is on the VA system but his daughter is private. He said last night to my Mrs that Heather is able to keep her policy going as-is.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 11:31:13 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

The insurance company has to have more income to make up for the "pre-existing conditions" regulation. That is quite obvious. They are still mandated (by a provision in Obamacare) to spend 80% of premium dollars towards medical care, leaving only 20% for non-care costs.


That's true. Insurers need to get healthy low-risk customers to pay more (or to enroll at all, which is why the individual mandate is part of the ACA) if they want to offset the costs of having to insure more high-risk high-cost patients. So of course they would rather have a healthy low-risk customer (and/or Uncle Sam) pay, say, $150/month instead of $50/month.

quote:

There is some incentive, then, for insurance companies to increase premiums, and providers raising costs helps insurance companies do that. I don't know that there are any incentives for providers to keep costs down, though. It very well could be in the best interest of a provider to raise it's costs, which helps insurance companies comply with the 80/20 rule, and still be able to raise premium rates.


There are apparently some measures in the ACA to control costs for Medicaid/Medicare, but as for private insurers I think that's left up to the free market. The idea being that, since the exchange forces insurers to be upfront about their prices, competition will keep costs down. How well this is going to work remains to be seen. In a lot of other countries, the government negotiates with hospitals, drug companies etc to keep costs down, but unfortunately that kind of measure didn't make it into the ACA.

quote:

If a parent company owned both providers and insurers, is there any doubt they have accountants working on maximizing that?


Yep, and that kind of stuff definitely happens. For example, one of the biggest prescription benefit management companies in the US, Caremark, is owned by CVS. I've heard some insurers own medical supply companies, too, for the same reason.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:05:24 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.


Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.


Again, the policies only lost grandfather status if they failed to come into compliance with the ACA or raised premiums while eliminating coverage. Simply obeying the ACA regs is not sufficient!

You lose your grandfather status if you FAILED TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE with the ACA. Then if you do come into compliance, thats a CHANGE,. so you lose your grandfather status?And obeying ACA regs is not sufficient!? What the hell are U smokin?

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:33:36 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Third, and what, pray tell, don't you understand about the VA healthcare system (government single-payer) being far inferior to the civilian healthcare system (private multi-payer)?

How,exactly, is it inferior?


Surely that (the VA system) would not be better for the majority of Americans.

If one cannot show that the va system is inferior how then could it not be better for the majority of americans?

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:35:14 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.


Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.


Again, the policies only lost grandfather status if they failed to come into compliance with the ACA or raised premiums while eliminating coverage. Simply obeying the ACA regs is not sufficient!


Simply not true.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:48:34 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare.

Yup the aca says what constitutes coverage...kinda forces the ins. companies to belly up to the bar. This is the level of coverage that is acceptable, anything less is not coverage. One can snivle all they like but that is the law. To not have known what the law was is less than believable.


This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.

Lemme see...the citizens of this country have been sniviling about how health care is too expensive and the govt responded with the aca( a federal plan proposed by a demopub based on a state plan by a republicrat) isn't that pretty much what the whole purpose of the aca???you know force the ins companies to do what they would not do voluntarily??? ,don't you think?



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:51:25 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The insurance company has to have more income to make up for the "pre-existing conditions" regulation. That is quite obvious. They are still mandated (by a provision in Obamacare) to spend 80% of premium dollars towards medical care, leaving only 20% for non-care costs.

That's true. Insurers need to get healthy low-risk customers to pay more (or to enroll at all, which is why the individual mandate is part of the ACA) if they want to offset the costs of having to insure more high-risk high-cost patients. So of course they would rather have a healthy low-risk customer (and/or Uncle Sam) pay, say, $150/month instead of $50/month.
quote:

There is some incentive, then, for insurance companies to increase premiums, and providers raising costs helps insurance companies do that. I don't know that there are any incentives for providers to keep costs down, though. It very well could be in the best interest of a provider to raise it's costs, which helps insurance companies comply with the 80/20 rule, and still be able to raise premium rates.

There are apparently some measures in the ACA to control costs for Medicaid/Medicare, but as for private insurers I think that's left up to the free market. The idea being that, since the exchange forces insurers to be upfront about their prices, competition will keep costs down. How well this is going to work remains to be seen. In a lot of other countries, the government negotiates with hospitals, drug companies etc to keep costs down, but unfortunately that kind of measure didn't make it into the ACA.


Cost controls for Medicare were mostly along the lines of service efficiencies. Why those efficiencies weren't instituted in and of themselves, I'm not sure, but there they are. Doc Fix bills show that Congress isn't likely to ever actually cut the cost of reimbursements, so I'm not sure how they are going to control costs.

quote:

quote:

If a parent company owned both providers and insurers, is there any doubt they have accountants working on maximizing that?

Yep, and that kind of stuff definitely happens. For example, one of the biggest prescription benefit management companies in the US, Caremark, is owned by CVS. I've heard some insurers own medical supply companies, too, for the same reason.


How do we fix that?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 12:52:43 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Well, since you seem to know the insurance companies never leave a plan alone surely it's not a stretch to assume Sabelius and Obama knew that also and, therefore, knew that most plans would not meet the grandfather exemption and, therefore, THEY DID INDEED LIE. Given that Obamacare mandates what the insurance companies MUST include in their policies, blaming this on the insurance companies is BULL$HIT.

That fact that the insurance companies make those changes, then the onus is on those insurance companies, not the president.
Ergo, the president didn't lie - the insurance companies moved the goalposts.


Not exactly, freedomdwarf. The insurance companies were forced to move them because of Obamacare. This was not a free choice. They had no choice other than to change the policies.


Again, the policies only lost grandfather status if they failed to come into compliance with the ACA or raised premiums while eliminating coverage. Simply obeying the ACA regs is not sufficient!

You lose your grandfather status if you FAILED TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE with the ACA. Then if you do come into compliance, thats a CHANGE,. so you lose your grandfather status?And obeying ACA regs is not sufficient!? What the hell are U smokin?

Read the regs!
http://webapps.dol.gov/FederalRegister/HtmlDisplay.aspx?DocId=23967&AgencyId=8&DocumentType=2
quote:

these interim final regulations, coordinated
rules are set forth for determining when changes to the terms of a plan
or health insurance coverage cause the plan or coverage to cease to be
a grandfathered health plan. The first of those rules (in paragraph
(g)(1)(i)) constrains the extent to which the scope of benefits can be
reduced. It provides that the elimination of all or substantially all
benefits to diagnose or treat a particular condition causes a plan or
health insurance coverage to cease to be a grandfathered health plan.
If, for example, a plan eliminates all benefits for cystic fibrosis,
the plan ceases to be a grandfathered health plan (even though this
condition may affect relatively few individuals covered under the
plan). Moreover, for purposes of paragraph (g)(1)(i), the elimination
of benefits for any necessary element to diagnose or treat a condition
is considered the elimination of all or substantially all benefits to
diagnose or treat a particular condition. An example in these interim
final regulations illustrates that if a plan provides benefits for a
particular mental health condition, the treatment for which is a
combination of counseling and prescription drugs, and subsequently
eliminates benefits for counseling, the plan is treated as having
eliminated all or substantially all benefits for that mental health
condition.
A second set of rules (in paragraphs (g)(1)(ii) through (g)(1)(iv))
limits the extent to which plans and issuers can increase the fixed-
amount and the percentage cost-sharing requirements that are imposed
with respect to individuals for covered items and services. Plans and
issuers can choose to make larger increases to fixed-amount or
percentage cost-sharing requirements than permissible under these
interim final regulations, but at that point the individual's plan or
health insurance coverage would cease to be grandfathered health plan
coverage. A more detailed description of the basis for the cost-sharing
requirements in these interim final regulations is included in section
IV.B later in this preamble.
These interim final regulations provide different standards with
respect to coinsurance and fixed-amount cost sharing. Coinsurance
automatically rises with medical inflation. Therefore, changes to the
level of coinsurance (such as moving from a requirement that the
patient pay 20 percent to a requirement that the patient pay 30 percent
of inpatient surgery costs) would significantly alter the level of
benefits provided. On the other hand, fixed-amount cost-sharing
requirements (such as copayments and deductibles) do not take into
account medical inflation. Therefore, changes to fixed-amount cost-
sharing requirements (for example, moving from a $35 copayment to a $40
copayment for outpatient doctor visits) may be reasonable to keep up
with the rising cost of medical items and services. Accordingly,
paragraph (g)(1)(ii) provides that any increase in a percentage cost-
sharing requirement (such as coinsurance) causes a plan or health
insurance coverage to cease to be a grandfathered health plan.
With respect to fixed-amount cost-sharing requirements, paragraph
(g)(1)(iii) provides two rules: a rule for cost-sharing requirements
other than copayments and a rule for copayments. Fixed-amount cost-
sharing requirements include, for example, a $500 deductible, a $30
copayment, or a $2,500 out-of-pocket limit. With respect to fixed-
amount cost-sharing requirements other than copayments, a plan or
health insurance coverage ceases to be a grandfathered health plan if
there is an increase, since March 23, 2010, in a fixed-amount cost-
sharing requirement that is greater than the maximum percentage
increase. The maximum percentage increase is defined as medical
inflation (from March 23, 2010) plus 15 percentage points. For this
purpose, medical inflation is defined in these interim final
regulations by reference to the overall medical care component of the
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, unadjusted (CPI),
published by the Department of Labor. For fixed-amount copayments, a
plan or health insurance coverage ceases to be a grandfathered health
plan if there is an increase since March 23, 2010 in the copayment that
exceeds the greater of (A) the maximum percentage increase or (B) five
dollars increased by medical inflation. A more detailed description of
the basis for these rules relating to cost-sharing requirements is
included in section IV.B later in this preamble.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 1:06:17 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Well that's the preamble, not the rules entire.

But its sufficient to show that a $5.15 change in copays - in any area - will cause an insurance plan to lose grandfather status.

These rates ROUTINELY change, every year, to reflect medical prices.
So for example, if the plan had a $250 patient co-pay for an ambulance trip - and the insurance company increases it to $255.15 - the insurance plan loses its grandfather status.

This applies to copays for specials, doctors, hospitals.. whatever. And its only one of dozens of reasons that a plan can lose status.

But the bottom line is that the administration expects 14 million out of 16-19 million people insured with individual health insurance will lose their coverage.

They expect similar numbers will lose it from small group coverage and large group coverage.

So the lie that "if you like your current coverage you can keep it- - no one is going to take it away from you " is just that.
A lie.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 10/30/2013 1:08:13 PM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 3:18:32 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well that's the preamble, not the rules entire.

But its sufficient to show that a $5.15 change in copays - in any area - will cause an insurance plan to lose grandfather status.


WRONG!

quote:

On the other hand, fixed-amount cost-sharing
requirements (such as copayments and deductibles) do not take into
account medical inflation. Therefore, changes to fixed-amount cost-
sharing requirements (for example, moving from a $35 copayment to a $40
copayment for outpatient doctor visits) may be reasonable to keep up
with the rising cost of medical items and services.

The rule actually states that the copay can increase by the rate of medical inflation plus 15%. So if $5.15 is below that threshold it is allowed. If it is more than that it is clearly gouging the consumer which is bad.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 10/30/2013 11:30:14 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu

This is a popular GOP talking point, which makes me wonder why any of them bother getting elected or pushing for any new legislation if they really think it's all just going to fail anyway.

But please, tell me how Social Security fucks up everything it does. How our National Parks fuck up everything they do. How the Department of Energy fucks up everything they do to protect our nuclear resources. How the FDA fucks up everything it does to make sure our food is safe to eat. How the NIH fucks up all the medical research it does.

I am not a GOP supporter (or a Dem supporter), it doesn't matter which party is in power, they are both bad..
Your food is safe to eat? really? the fact that various chemicals (over 200 of them) can be hidden in the ingredient list as "spices", the fact that Monsanto almost was exempted from the law & have influence to get preferential treatment.. did you miss the Monsanto Protection Act? the list goes on.. Social Security is also not what promised cuz of govt mismanagement, rules are gonna be changed to short-change those retiring & dump much of the burden on the kids of today, changes to retirement plans, the sell out of Americans to wall street by both parties.. the overburden of paperwork, rules & pointless legislation.. If you think the govt is doing a good job, well, did you miss the shutdown? did you miss the 2007 depression (which the US is still struggling with)? did you miss the NSA spying? how many more examples do you want? sheesh!

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: OBAMA LIED!!! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109