Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: ADDICTS


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ADDICTS Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 9:53:37 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
Regardless of whatever contempt you may feel for religion, Christianity, and Jesus, and regardless also of whatever disappointment you may find in the lack of premise-testing you think Dr Bob and/or Bill W failed to do, the program they started has spread around he world and is credited with helping millions of alcoholics recover from various and sundry awful circumstances to healthy and well-adjusted lives. It's a free country; you can piss on that record as you wish.


It's not Dr. Bob noticing that hanging out made it easier to not drink thus inventing the support group that I'm taking issue with.

It's AA's useless woo which needlessly causes anxiety and depression in a group already at high risk for suicide, yeah I'll piss on that record of demonstrable, pointless harm.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074054720800038X

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 2:15:30 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

It's AA's useless woo which needlessly causes anxiety and depression in a group already at high risk for suicide, yeah I'll piss on that record of demonstrable, pointless harm.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074054720800038X

Tell me how you think I am mistaken that the inferences we can draw from the studies you linked are that spiritual guidance lacks efficacy because it does not touch upon the source of the pain that occasioned the lapse into addiction. Isn't it just another variant of the personally weak or morally limited addict personality who cannot take control and gain responsibility?

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 2:34:03 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I don't know of anything anyone would consider reliable "statistics". The general conversation/belief, based on some pretty nebulous "survey" AA conducted years ago is that half of everyone who ever attends an AA meeting will st some point achieve a year sober, and half of those will make it to five years sober. After that.... ???? My personal experience is that if you make it five years sobriety is both a habit and a well-supported lifestyle (your friends are sober types, your hobbies do not involve people who drink, etc).



Errrr,no.
When I worked in rehabs we told the, ahem, clients (AKA junkies, crackies and drunks...you know,like me) that 1 out of 30 would have long term recovery, 4 would be struggling with some level of sobriety, and 1 would be dead. Dunno where they got the stats (I suspect Hazelton),but that's pretty standard rehab dogma.
I would be loathe to trust any stats I saw re AA,NA or any other A and recovery rates. First off,all addicts are liars so the odds of getting straight answers are miniscule. More importantly,how does one get straight stats from an anonymous amorphous program.
The best numbers I've seen actually come from recovery chips sold.
IIRC, they sold one 1 year chip for everyone 100 month chip and something like 1:100 five year to one year chips sold. They also sold something like 1:1000 ratio for twenty year chips.
Long term sobriety is brutally tough and it's been that way from the start.
I have some friends who got sober out of the original groups. One of my buddies was sponsored by Clarance Snyder (the Home Brewmeister from the stories)-Dr Bob was his sponsor and Clarence was responsible for breaking AA off of the Oxford Groups.
He has Clarence's original 1st edition big book. Written and signed on the inner front page of the book are the names and sobriety dates of the first people who founded AA. And on the back page are the names and dates when almost all those folks went out.

Best as I can tell,after years of looking, AA and all the other A's run, at best, between a 3-5% recovery rate (And that's only over 1-5 years). Interestingly enough, something like 2% of addicts just quit using spontaneously on their own.
So the 12 step groups may add between a 1-3% of recovery.
Which may not mean much unless its you or a loved ones life on the line.
Then,I suspect that difference may just mean the world.

Course, there is one side note, one I never failed to mention to the rehab clients. People ain't statistics.They have the power of self determination. They can make their own future and the only thing preventing them from recovery is themselves.
Their future is their choice.

< Message edited by Kana -- 12/9/2013 3:17:30 PM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 7:04:41 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

The best numbers I've seen actually come from recovery chips sold.
IIRC, they sold one 1 year chip for everyone 100 month chip and something like 1:100 five year to one year chips sold. They also sold something like 1:1000 ratio for twenty year chips.


Pretty close :)

About 1/3 of the way down: http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-effectiveness.html




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 7:13:24 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Yes, people are not statistics. So if it's working for someone, great! Keep going back.

I think the "powerless" and "disease" models can be counter-productive to some people, however. I certainly did not find them useful.

The Surprising Truth About Addiction

...Every year, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health interviews Americans about their drug and alcohol habits. Ages 18 to 25 constitute the peak period of drug and alcohol use. In 2002, the latest year for which data are available, 22 percent of Americans between ages 18 and 25 were abusing or were dependent on a substance, versus only 3 percent of those aged 55 to 59. These data show that most people overcome their substance abuse, even though most of them do not enter treatment.

More: http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200407/the-surprising-truth-about-addiction

The Effectiveness of the Twelve-Step Treatment

There is experimental evidence that the A.A. doctrine of powerlessness leads to binge drinking. In a sophisticated controlled study of A.A.'s effectiveness (Brandsma et. al.), court-mandated offenders who had been sent to Alcoholics Anonymous for several months were engaging in FIVE TIMES as much binge drinking as another group of alcoholics who got no treatment at all, and the A.A. group was doing NINE TIMES as much binge drinking as another group of alcoholics who got rational behavior therapy.

Those results are almost unbelievable, but are easy to understand — when you are drunk, it's easy to rationalize drinking some more by saying,

"Oh well, A.A. says that I'm powerless over alcohol. I can't control it, so there is no sense in trying. I'm doomed, because I already took a drink. One drink, one drunk. I'm screwed, because I already lost all of my sober time, and I have to give back all of my sobriety coins. Might as well just relax and enjoy it now. Pass that bottle over here, buddy."

It's also easy to rationalize taking the first drink with,

"I'm powerless. I can't help it. The Big Book says that I have no defense against those strange mental blank spots when I'll drink again. Bottoms up!"

More on this study (and others): http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-effectiveness.html

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 7:37:34 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Isn't it just another variant of the personally weak or morally limited addict personality who cannot take control and gain responsibility?



I was hoping, from your absence in the discussion, that you'd figured out that it would be best to maybe just keep quiet and learn a little bit, Vince, but this latest crap demonstrates you are still as ignorant as when you started it.

Where do you come up with this shit? Who are you to pass such judgements on the lives and struggles of others?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 11:06:31 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I would be loathe to trust any stats I saw re AA,NA or any other A and recovery rates


As am I- including yours.
The sales percentages of recovery chips doesn't mean too much as far as I'm concerned. Members of my home group return medallions (those "chips" received to commemorate yearly sobriety anniversaries, usually called birthdays) in exchange for the next one received (that is, we exchange our 5-year medallion for a six-year medallion, etc); I have been to meetings from Ca to NY and seen this done. While that exchange is also fairly common with the plastic "poker chips" most groups hand out for 1, 3, 6, and 9 months, this ritual is not as universally observed for those "lesser" mementos.

Further, your 3-5% recovery rate seems to me to fly in the face of common sense. For AA attendance to grow as dramatically as it has.... well, that would mean a helluva lot of people through the revolving door if only 5% stayed behind for any period of time.

Finally, that flies in the face of my own experience. A far greater percentage of those I sponsored made it both to one and five years- and I have certainly never considered myself to be any great shakes as a sponsor.

quote:

Long term sobriety is brutally tough and it's been that way from the start.


My first year was. After that it got a lot easier- but I had a lot of family support left. Somewhere along the way it (not drinking) just became a habit.

< Message edited by truckinslave -- 12/9/2013 11:12:10 PM >


_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 11:21:38 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
I just thought of something else.
I and many of my pigeons collected virtual stacks of white chips, and smaller numbers of other monthly chips, but after getting my first nine-month chip I have never relapsed- so while I might be responsible for 20 white chips, I am only responsible for 1 one-year medallion, 1 two-year medallion..... 1 twenty-three year medallion.

Recovery is like membership in a nudist colony. The first day (week/month/year) is the hardest.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 11:27:55 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
Actually, that is true in my experience.

I have always (that is, from rehab to now) railed against the AA concept of "powerlessness" and cautioned people that it was in no way to be used as an excuse in the manner your post suggests.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: ADDICTS - 12/9/2013 11:54:25 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
It always amazes me when real, palpable anger is directed at passive people or groups.
Being contemptuous towards AA makes less sense to me than Spike playing poker for kittens on Buffy.
Anger can be damned near as addictive as anything else; I hope your program works for you, "woo"- whatever that is- or not.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 6:05:13 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

The sales percentages of recovery chips doesn't mean too much as far as I'm concerned. Members of my home group return medallions (those "chips" received to commemorate yearly sobriety anniversaries, usually called birthdays) in exchange for the next one received (that is, we exchange our 5-year medallion for a six-year medallion, etc); I have been to meetings from Ca to NY and seen this done. While that exchange is also fairly common with the plastic "poker chips" most groups hand out for 1, 3, 6, and 9 months, this ritual is not as universally observed for those "lesser" mementos.

Further, your 3-5% recovery rate seems to me to fly in the face of common sense. For AA attendance to grow as dramatically as it has.... well, that would mean a helluva lot of people through the revolving door if only 5% stayed behind for any period of time.

Finally, that flies in the face of my own experience. A far greater percentage of those I sponsored made it both to one and five years- and I have certainly never considered myself to be any great shakes as a sponsor.


Yeah-that may be the deal round your parts,but most of the places I've seen people keep their chips, especially the year anniversary chips,and pass them down through sponsorship families. But they don't give em back. I think the only time I've seen that is when guys go out, come back and return their old chips as part of the fresh start.

As for 3-5%, sure it makes sense. Most of the people in any given meeting aren't going to be there two, three,five years down the road. Most meetings are full of tourists,people who are there for court, or to keep the judge or job or wife or whatever off their back,there's always a bunch of people who roll in and out on a quasiregular basis, a few people who are really trying,most of whom will get derailed,then the hard core regulars.

All the A's have a stunningly high turnover rate.Now some of this is because people get their lives together, move up and on, lots of it is because addicts are transient by nature, but mostly it's because of the recidivism rate-they go out and use.

AA grew real fast in the beginning, had some big jumps in the early 70s (When the drugs hit), again in the mid eighties (The great rehab boom where) but attendance has pretty much flattened or slightly decreased since the mid nineties. All those other A's, man-they provide competition.
Go to a meeting you haven't been in a few years,see how many people are still there.It's sad and staggering how few remain. I have a buddy who likes to point to the empty seats,remind folks that those are empty because of dead people who passed that others may remain

Lastly, re your sponsorship numbers-what percentage of people who walk in the door actually get a sponsor? I bet it's not large.

Most walk in, never come back.Or they drop by a few times, wander out, scared by God,or the more cultish aspects or religion or because whatever but all because they ain't done, use the revolving door. Few have the humility, the crushed pride,the lives broken enough to overcome that addict ego and ask a stranger for help. Fewer still have the discipline and dedication to remain on the path for extended periods.

And of those,how many end up with a sponsor who is really good and knows what they are about,having had a "deep and effective spiritual experience which has revolutionized their whole lives" they can pass on to another. I walk into meetings and far to often see the blind leading the broken,clueless people giving fatal advice based out of ego or something they heard some wingnut spout from a podium.I hear nonsense, propaganda, lots and lots of ego, and very little real sponsorship.

I'm not knocking or denigrating your experience. Please don't take it that way (What-am I gonna say your experience is wrong?How could it be? It's your experience.) But it's just that,your experience.
And I'm sharing mine as a person who worked within the professional recovery community.

And again,and I can't empathize this enough. AA varies greatly across the country. Certain places have lots of small tight meetings. Others have lots of turnover, huge meetings. There's a homegroup in Cali (IIRC-The Pacific Group) that has like 5,000 people every week. Some areas concentrate on the fundamentals,steps, God,sponsorship, others wander pretty far afield, into what I would term crystal hippie BS.
My point is that it's highly divergent (As expected from a group of junkies and drunks-it's far far easier to herd cats than get those lunatics to march in lockstep)and extremely differentiated,due to a whole bunch of factors,some external, some not so much.
Just cuz my experience doesn't match yours and yours doesn't match mine-that doesn't mean that either is wrong or right. They are simply that, our experience.
Nothing more .Nothing less.


< Message edited by Kana -- 12/10/2013 6:13:24 AM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 12:36:37 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Isn't it just another variant of the personally weak or morally limited addict personality who cannot take control and gain responsibility?



I was hoping, from your absence in the discussion, that you'd figured out that it would be best to maybe just keep quiet and learn a little bit, Vince, but this latest crap demonstrates you are still as ignorant as when you started it.

Where do you come up with this shit? Who are you to pass such judgements on the lives and struggles of others?

Despite your unbridled hostility, Rich, I have remained tuned in and watched while you took the issues I posed in the OP and made them all about your own particular drama. Which raises two salient issues. One of course is the obvious question of where the fuck you have the audacity to generalize your particular life dysfunction to all of the population of addicts who suffer from substance abuse and/or behavioral compulsions? Someone who does that is totally self-absorbed I think. If you will reread the OP you will notice that your name was never mentioned. The second salient question is who are you so angry at? At me? Someone you have never met? Or at your own demons, who you confront frequently by your accounts?

There was nothing in the OP or in the question I asked above that passed judgment about other peoples' lives and struggles. By your ranting I infer that not ever having been an alcoholic myself I am prohibited from researching the issue and raising questions. Does the same also hold true that because I have never had lung cancer I cannot read and form opinions on conflicting literature about treatment for that disease or for the causes of that disease? Well, no! That's bullshit. By your ranting one would think that only victims can voice opinions. From my perspective that presents a tyranny from the self-absorbed. You, with your alcoholism and your unfortunate life struggles do not OWN the topic of addiction nor the topic of human suffering. The topic of this thread is more universal than your personal issues.

You might wish to consult someone about the source of your anger, Rich. It might help you get over yourself and see that these message boards do not revolve around you and your particular issues.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 12/10/2013 1:17:56 PM >

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 1:37:10 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I'm not knocking or denigrating your experience.


I do not "hear" anger or denigration or anything like that in your posts. If anything in our exchange has been negative, it's that I failed to keep a defensive tone out of mine.
FWIW, I agree with everything you wrote except the 5% rate; even having slept on it, that seems low (although I admit I may be having a hard time distinguishing between my thoughts and my feelings here. Certainly I want that number to be low).
Hard numbers, as we both have noted, just don't exist.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 3:40:10 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

I'm not knocking or denigrating your experience.


I do not "hear" anger or denigration or anything like that in your posts. If anything in our exchange has been negative, it's that I failed to keep a defensive tone out of mine.
FWIW, I agree with everything you wrote except the 5% rate; even having slept on it, that seems low (although I admit I may be having a hard time distinguishing between my thoughts and my feelings here. Certainly I want that number to be low).
Hard numbers, as we both have noted, just don't exist.

Sorry-wasn't implying anything of the sort on your part. I've danced in the rooms of recovery for a long time now and I've oft found that people get defensive when others do what I just did and sometimes feel as if I'm questioning their experience (And get defensive about the results too...not that I blame em. If someone told me my experience was wrong I'd look at them as if they'd grown three heads).
I wasn't trying to do that at all.
5% is a lot more than it looks like when you compound it. A group that grows at 5% will double at fifteen years and double again at 24. At 3% growth, it will take 25 years to double.
Also, at some point,you have to figure a normal % rise simply to a corresponding gain in population-the only real rise is the % number above population growth. Then you have to calculate for the rise of NA, CA, GA,Malibu Recovery, and all the other concepts that will pull away potential AA's. It's a complicated schemata.
Best chart I can find on growth is in the Orange Papers and it shows AA growing real fast at first, then a good rise post 60's (Drugs man,they raised the bottom...or more precisely,brought the depths of the bottom home real fast) that continued to the mid 90's, flatlining then.

From the Orange Papers

quote:

The membership of A.A. has grown according to population theory and has reached, or is very close to,its
maximum possible sustainable membership.
However impressive the growth of A.A. in the past it is clear than it has entered, since 1992, a period, now almost twenty years long,of stagnation.
The membership of A.A. has grown from 1.23M to 1.31M, or by only 6.8%, from 1992 to 2007. The per capita A.A. membership has fallen from 0.432% to 0.393%, that’s a decrease of 9.0%, from 1992 to 2007.
The number of newcomers going to A.A. each year averaged approx. 800,000 from 1992 to 2007 and yet with this massive influx of newcomers the membership averaged a net annual growth of 0.44%p.a. or just 5,611 members per year.


Again, these numbers contain what I believe to be extremely high volatility in that AA and the other A's tend to work in pockets throughout the nation. Some places have lots of strong sponsorship,great support, tons of meetings, high participation and real welcoming groups where,if a person walks in and (This is huge) actually wants to change their life, they have a remarkable chance of doing so.
In converse, there are also places where the lone addict has almost zero chance of getting the help they need and a straight message. That anyone gets clean in these places amazes me and is an amazing testament to the power of desperation.
This is also affected because some areas in the country contain less people who are sentenced by the courts-in other words, they have only voluntary participation, not compulsory and its my bet that those areas have a higher recovery rate.

One last word-I'd be real cautious of anything World Services prints re past numbers. They have, how to put this nicely, been known to fudge certain aspects of the past and gloss over others entirely,in an attempt to keep the recovery conversation headed along the routes they prefer.

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 7:35:38 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Despite your unbridled hostility, Rich, I have remained tuned in and watched while you took the issues I posed in the OP and made them all about your own particular drama. Which raises two salient issues. One of course is the obvious question of where the fuck you have the audacity to generalize your particular life dysfunction to all of the population of addicts who suffer from substance abuse and/or behavioral compulsions? Someone who does that is totally self-absorbed I think. If you will reread the OP you will notice that your name was never mentioned. The second salient question is who are you so angry at? At me? Someone you have never met? Or at your own demons, who you confront frequently by your accounts?




LOL, Vince. I love the way you try to redirect your lack of comprehension, and unwillingness to be educated, on these matters into an attack on me. A number of posters have brought their own firsthand experiences to the topic, while you watched a not-ready-for-primetime TED, and applied some 30 year old assumptions about what people think. You went trolling to get slapped, and you found what you were looking for.

What is even funnier is that in the absence of a devil saying what you want to argue with, you just throw the shit out there yourself.

Grow up.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 9:19:26 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Tell me how you think I am mistaken that the inferences we can draw from the studies you linked are that spiritual guidance lacks efficacy because it does not touch upon the source of the pain that occasioned the lapse into addiction.

There is another possibility that would explain why spiritual counciling is harmful. Changing ones "spiritual" position is stressful. We're talking about an underlying position upon which decades of subsequent positions are balanced. And all those positions need to be reworked out in a pile of cognetive dissonence. As somebody who's gone through such a change I can assure everyone that it kind of sucks. It's a horrible thing to be doing to addicts in the early stages of their recovery.

Picture me going around a hospital and trying to deconvert the patients there, I think the religious individuals in this thread can probably recognize what a dick move that would be. And that's before we add in things like being ordered by a court to listen to my spiel and using my athority as an "expert" to convience people that believing in my worldview is essential to their recovery. Doing it the other way around isn't any less dickish. I mean for fucks sake these people fucked up a guy so bad that they had him worshipping a rock.


P.S. You asked me to explain how you're mistaken, but I'm not even sure I understand your position at this point. You've made several statements that seem contradictory to me.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 9:35:35 PM   
sheisreeds


Posts: 578
Joined: 7/8/2008
Status: offline
As a student I interned at an outpatient substance abuse clinic where the majority of clients were mandated by courts. As in if they did not show they were headed to jail. A staggering number made it to more than a couple of appointments. And, it was pretty much a sure VOP and some jail time if they didn't come in.

Now I work in a mobile dual diagnosis program, we firmly believe in harm reduction. Essentially our role is to do what we can to reduce harm, to be a lifeline, a safety net, and if we're lucky catch someone before they die. Any teensy opening of someone wanting help we do our best to jump on.

My observation has been that recovery doesn't happen until someone is just done, and fed up, or it is when there is some opportunity of hope internal/external that provides a sense that something else is really possible.

Also at times there is a life altering event that while it has some epiphany attached it also has the benefit of removing the addict from the situation.

No one I have worked with also just turned off the tap and been done, lots of slips, and slides. This is when my team works the hardest to help quickly pick up the pieces and put them back together before it all falls a part.

Some of my folks are so severely traumatized and ingrained into addiction and all it involves I understand why even the idea of recovery is so hard to come by. Addiction often starts as a way to ignore the monster under the bed, only in to realize in the brief moments of sobriety and/or clarity that now there are monsters everywhere. A quick fix to a problem has now made the problem 10x worse.

Also, not everyone gets addicted. There is clearly some genetics, and/or potentially deeply trained behaviors involved. Addiction by nature is not something that one can just stop, I've seen it take years, sometimes even decades for it to really register as a problem.

_____________________________

~ s.

Oh my darling, give me reason
give me something to believe in



You need a spankin' baby!

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: ADDICTS - 12/10/2013 10:20:16 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
I mean for fucks sake these people fucked up a guy so bad that they had him worshipping a rock.



I think you have badly misunderstood the purpose of the pebble, GotSteel. As I'm interpreting the story, the individual in question was told to get a higher power, so he created a symbol to serve the need, not an object of worship.






_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: ADDICTS - 12/11/2013 5:42:52 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Despite your unbridled hostility, Rich, I have remained tuned in and watched while you took the issues I posed in the OP and made them all about your own particular drama. Which raises two salient issues. One of course is the obvious question of where the fuck you have the audacity to generalize your particular life dysfunction to all of the population of addicts who suffer from substance abuse and/or behavioral compulsions? Someone who does that is totally self-absorbed I think. If you will reread the OP you will notice that your name was never mentioned. The second salient question is who are you so angry at? At me? Someone you have never met? Or at your own demons, who you confront frequently by your accounts?




LOL, Vince. I love the way you try to redirect your lack of comprehension, and unwillingness to be educated, on these matters into an attack on me. A number of posters have brought their own firsthand experiences to the topic, while you watched a not-ready-for-primetime TED, and applied some 30 year old assumptions about what people think. You went trolling to get slapped, and you found what you were looking for.

What is even funnier is that in the absence of a devil saying what you want to argue with, you just throw the shit out there yourself.

Grow up.

With 20 million untreated addicts out there first hand experiences don't count for shit except for those who are just spinning their wheels blindly and helplessly in the same old mud ruts. It is not a one glove fits all hands solution. Your experience is your experience. Period. Nobody elses. As I said way early in this thread many addicts are not in a place to make a choice for themselves. What do we do for them then?

Get over yourself, Rich. You are expert only on your own illness.


< Message edited by vincentML -- 12/11/2013 6:04:17 AM >

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: ADDICTS - 12/11/2013 5:57:13 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
>We're talking about an underlying position upon which decades of subsequent positions are balanced. And all those positions need to be reworked out in a pile of cognetive dissonence.<

Exactly. My position from the outset was that the afflicted need to be treated with compassion as we treat any other ill or injured people rather than condemn them as moral failures, which we do as a society, blaming them for their inability to take responsibility and wasting incredible sums of money engaging in a 'war on drugs.'


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ADDICTS Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105