myotherself
Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006 From: The cold bit of the UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David92506 My assertion is that women have it easier in developing a relationship than men do using online dating sites. I don't agree. I believe it's easier for women to develop a relationship if they settle for second or third best, but I think the odds are the same if they are looking for a quality relationship. My viewpoint is from the M/f side of things...I don't really know enough about the m/F side of things to be qualified to comment. quote:
This is my argument: A man may send out 50 emails to 50 different women and perhaps no one will respond. A women may get 50 emails within a week from 50 different men who want to meet her. A woman may argue that those 50 men just want sex and not a relationship. But the only way she will know that is if she meets all 50 men. If a man is being selective in who he messages rather than sending one to every woman with a pulse and a vagina, then he's got a better chance of getting a reply. If he only sends them to women whose selection criteria he meets, then his chances increase again. If he only sends polite messages that do not discuss his penis/kinks/delusions of grandeur, then his chances improve exponentially. quote:
If you were a gambling man who would you put your money on who will be the first to develop a relationship: A man who doesn't meet anyone or a woman who will meet 50 different men? If a woman receives 50 messages a week, then it's highly unlikely she'll meet all of these men. Women who do online dating tend to get smart, quickly. I figured out that a guy is on his best behaviour for a week, maybe two. Then the mask starts to slip and you see the 'real' man. When I was looking, I would keep a guy chatting online for 2 or 3 weeks. By that time you get to know whether the man is a horndog (married or otherwise) and you don't even consider meeting him. I must have been messaged by hundreds of guys while I was looking. About half of those could be instantly rejected for the idiotic 'hi' messages, or the fantasy-driven wankfests. A further quarter or so completely ignored my personal search criteria, so they were rejected. So that leaves a quarter or so. These guys I'd start to chat with online. Quite quickly you'd lose the majority of these guys once they figured out I wasn't going to help them get their rocks off online, and I wasn't going to meet them for a quick shag behind the wife's back. I'd be left with maybe 4 or 5 who were possible. Then you meet these few guys, and there'd be no chemistry with most of them. Nice guys, just no chemistry. In my 8 years of dating through BDSM sites (this one and bondage.com) I met maybe 10 guys in total. I dated 2 of them. One lasted a few months before he realised he couldn't keep up the dominance outside the bedroom. The other...well, we've been together 3 years. Maybe I'm too choosy, but I found a real dearth of eligible guys who fit my criteria. I'm glad I waited for the right one though, instead of settling for less than I needed/wanted. quote:
I've chatted with women and they believe the odds are the same for both genders. But I just don't understand their viewpoint and they don't understand my viewpoint. It seems to me that women have more opportunity than men. What is your response? I would say that women get more messages than men. Quantity does not equate to quality, not by a long chalk.
_____________________________
There's nowt so queer as folk
|