LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: planomaid So, what drives a dominant to treat another person like shit and proclaim that they will cherish and love and desire that person? Aren't you supposed to CARE and LOVE the person you are with? I think that a dominant who is searching has no particular requirement towards the individuals xhe is screening. That being said, if an individual is boorish and crass, xhe will likely find hirself attracting individuals whose level of self-respect permits them to be treated that way -- not the kind of individual I'd prefer to have attracted to me, but hey, what one puts out into the Universe, one gets back. If an arrangement has been entered into, and that arrangement says that a given dominant individual is supposed to love and cherish hir servant, then yes, that is a part of the relationship. Here, we don't offer "love". We do care for our servants, but it takes time for us to come to love people -- we have to get to know them first... so we can't offer that right out of the gate. quote:
I wonder how much of the desire to humilate and inflict emotional anguish on someone else comes from internal insecurities? Or perhaps the dominant was fucked over by someone else in the past and they feel that they need to do the same to as many others to justify their own "strength"? For some, personal insecurities and traumas may be the issue, but in this way of living, there -are- people who enjoy giving and getting humiliation and objectification as part of their way of interacting -- it just downright gets them going. If it doesn't get me going, I may not understand why it trips someone else's trigger, and I certainly won't go looking for it myself, or encourage others to try to either ask it of me or give it to me. HOWEVER, this does -not- mean that I would try to judge anyone who -did- enjoy those things, or question why they should want to do that. This is a HUGE group of people, with widely divergent tastes, in many diverse cultures. The BDSM "community", in fact, seems to me to be a sort of country of its very own, minus the land, populated with just about every variant available -- so there are bound to be people who like something I don't, and that's just fine. quote:
I'm not oblivious to the sexualization of humiliation. Actually, I'm sometimes appalled at how sooo much of the lifestyle has devolved into nothing but kinky sex for people. It's not the ONLY reason to be dominant/submissive! Again, for some people, that kinky sex MAY be the only reason to be dominant/submissive, and that's fine for those who want that. If you want something different, there are -plenty- of opportunities for different types of relationships, with different levels of committment. As an example, in our household, the servants are not kept at -all- for sex. Our enclave is dedicated to service -- either physical service or spiritual service. Some may like that, others think it stupid -- but it is what we do, and for those who are looking for that way of life, so be it. If someone is looking for a life where they are stripped and beaten daily with a barbed rubber flogger until they bleed, they'd be a poor fit for us -- but I'm sure that somewhere, there is a happy match where they'd belong. quote:
Maybe its a personal preference, but I've never been turned on by someone (usually female) screaming at me to kneel before them like the piece of shit I am. I happen to like the Southern traditions of a lady - and anyone who knows anything about the South would NEVER make the mistake of thinking that a woman acting lady like is weak! No, Southern girls use their femininty as both a badge of honor and as a very effective instrument when interacting with men. It's not a question of equality, its a question of how the two genders are taught to interact in polite society, especially in the public forum. And this -is-, very much, a personal preference. I've spoken with men who aren't interested in the LEAST in genteel women like SR and myself -- they want a woman who will humiliate them, treat them like an animal, and, in some cases, treat them like a thing. I've met a few who want to spend the rest of their days as a toilet. I couldn't help them in their desires. It certainly isn't my choice of what to do or how to do it -- and I can't necessarily understand why they would want to be in that position... but they do, and what we feel is not -wrong-... it just -is-. Preferences are just that -- preferences... opinions... biased choices. Not right, or wrong... they just -are-. quote:
So that gets me back to my original question. Is there something to the dominant being insecure with their own self to humiliate submissives? Or could it be that they are insecure in their role and fall back on what they read in books or see on the web to cover their own shortcomings? And while there is certainly a portion who are neither and truly get off on humiliating others, I am hoping that they are a distinct minority. Fortunately, the individuals that I've met who are involved in humiliation out of the pleasure of humiliating those who enjoy being humiliated are the MAJORITY of the actual active, living, breathing, face-to-face community. I would be -much- more concerned if the people who practiced this way of life were doing so out of some sense of insecurity or personal angst than if they just truly enjoyed the process. Just because humiliation isn't your kink or my kink doesn't make it any more abberrent or wrong than anything else that people choose to CONSENTUALLY practice with one another. ZWD
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language. Bladewing Enclave
|