ExiledTyrant -> RE: Have you encountered the Hesitant Dominant? (2/3/2014 5:01:32 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Blonderfluff But. 2nd date tomorrow with T ( I don't want to use His "name" until I ask Him..) A week of 4 hour phone calls followed by our first date last week. I was in shock when I met Him. And He couldn't stop smiling. We laugh. We flirt. I don't think any Dom in the history Domly Domness has ever fully tapped into my submissiveness so deeply and so quickly. I just want to curl up in His lap...and then go make Him a 4 course meal. Lol!! So far, the only drawback i see is that He can't stop smiling and laughing at me. Says I am adorable. Might be a problem if He can't keep a straight face when I step out of line....hehehehe. I will keep you all posted.... He has invited me out for tomorrow night.... ~doing a little happy subbie dance~~ Well, there she goes, feeling that delusional fantasy Dominant woowoo. Poor thing, it was probably just the burrito. Someone should set her strait, there is no Easter bunny, Santa clause, queen of England, or Dom woowoo. It's time to get out of fantasy land and put on the big girl panties. quote:
ORIGINAL: Blonderfluff Okay. I hate to post this, but I will for closure. He was a very nice man. But not a match for me. Turns out he has a long-standing relationship with a married woman that is on-going. That is not something I want any part of. Added to that, he was not forthright from the beginning, and it's a deal-breaker for me. Back to the drawing board!!!! ~smiles~ I cannot imagine why she didn't just move in, kneel down, suck cock, and pay rent. After all, in the presence of a D, her limits, wants, and needs should've crumbled away with the intensity of the slave fire in her belly reducing her to that one primal instinctual need all women feel; serve the master! quote:
ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Blonderfluff If He doesn't give off that little buzz, hum of D energy, I am just not going to be interested in him. It's not a judgment thing. It's a chemistry thing!!! But from the evidence I have, which is posts you've written that I've read, you're not in a strong position here. Your Positive Experience thread ended with the guy treating you, and the relationship, in a way contrary to your ethics and hard limits. Again, why can't she grasp the Stepford /s thing and fall to her knees. Settling is good, I'm sure it's in the "one true way subbie handbook". quote:
Yet here you are, talking about the great importance of first-meet-off-the-internet chemistry, and disagreeing with sub and switch women in successful long-term relationships when those women are trying to give you advice. Naturally since /s's come off an assembly line in "purveyor of dangerous but desirable behavior Inc. in FL", I don't know what the hell she's thinking. I'll lodge a complaint with RS about this shit... Faulty equipment is not good for business. quote:
I think there's a pretty good chance that you are defending your right to use criteria to choose a Master for Tonight, even though you claim to be searching for a Master for Life. Try as I may, try as I might, I have no idea where the fuck this came from. She could've easily went home with Dom for the night Mr. T. She said she felt the very tangible D vibe from him, but he hit a HARD limit. Again, WTF were you thinking with that? quote:
You do realize that Love at First Sight doesn't happen often, right? And that Kana, with whom you agreed so strongly, knew his sub literally for years as a friend only with "no" chemistry, before they decided to go for it? Do you think the classic suggestion "Friends First" is terrible advice? Clearly you weren't a fly on the wall for Kana and LW either. quote:
Bottom line for me: you seem to be interested primarily in an experience where you are swept off your feet like a young girl having her first romantic and sexual experience. And what, pray tell, is wrong with that? quote:
But a man with a history of monogamy -- -- Does not a rampant poon whore make. He can, could, would, and will date hundreds of women, ONE. AT. A. TIME. Learning and refining the partner he will be in a relationship and refining the partner he is seeking. He will have to unplug, crawl out of the basement, and get out there to do so, but that doesn't diminish nor impugn his monogamous nature. quote:
say just one or two long term relationships in his life -- is going to have less practice dating than someone who has dated lots of women. Obviously eharmony isn't working out quite as well as advertised. Unplug, crawl out, and get out there. quote:
So if you're hunting for one final life relationship, it might even be appropriate to see "got game" almost as a red flag, instead of something you need as a mandatory. Game had nothing to do with the OP or what she is looking for. She is looking for the natural (left handed) D that resonates with her on the terms that she can live with, without compromising her core values. I get pretty sick of of "the well read poser dominant" screaming, bitching, whining, and raising hell that because the /s has limits, ethics, values, and a razor sharp self awareness of what they can and cannot sign up for, they are fakes. I see our /boys and /girls often bending to the point of breaking because it is in their nature to please and serve. It's a rare, and prestigious, quality that a few of our Men and Women have to bend as well. YMMV Exiled
|
|
|
|