MrRodgers -> RE: Evolution/Creation debate (2/7/2014 10:49:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice FR I tried watching but lacked the patience for the 13-minute countdown. I doubt it would have been worth it even if you had had the patience. Evolution/Creation debates seem invariably to descend into one side proclaiming theology as fact and the other side proclaiming theory as fact. In short, a pissing contest between priests. Frankly, the notion that all life evolved from a single common ancestor has always struck me as likely to be no less a made up story than Genesis. If life arose once, why not more than once, in different forms in different niches? I could see all plants having a common ancestor, for example, but while natural selection works fine to explain speciation it seems increasingly inadequate when called upon to account for the phyla and kingdoms. Superficially, these arguments appear to center on a literal interpretation of Genesis, i.e., a God who is "outside" nature "creating" the world and its creatures. But in most of the debates, evolution is just being used as a stalking horse for abiogenesis, i.e., "spontaneous generation" dressed up in a new clown suit, just like Creationism changed costumes to become "Intelligent Design." Which brings us back to the pissing contest between priests. Meanwhile, of course, it's possible to view the universe as a manifestation of Deity, in which case there's no conflict between evolution and believing in God as the source of all life. But then, of course, the clergy couldn't have any fun. K. Except that evolution in species is no longer a theory...it is fact and has been proven in the science of the laboratory. Scientists have bacteria evolve right before our eyes.
|
|
|
|