RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility:

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility:

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility:

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 10:20:39 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You still need to work on following your own advice, Hill.
1. Your statements and questions demonstrate that you haven't read the Market Analysis.
2. Why gripe about the KXL being built only for exports (which isn't true)?
3. Why did prices go up, then?

My statements have only been about those who lie to try to get what they want. They have nothing to do with the market analysis.
I wasn't griping about the KXL being for exports, I was griping about the lying by those trying to justify it (see a common thread here?)
Prices went up because of insider trading and speculation, not because of supply and demand as has been shown numerous times.
If supplies are higher, demand is lower and prices are going up, manipulation is the most likely suspect neh?

The State Dept. report justifies it being built. Did the State Dept. lie, too?

How does insider trading and speculation not factor into supply/demand curves? They are market distortion, no?

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Hillwilliam)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 10:25:35 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
How does insider trading and speculation not factor into supply/demand curves? They are market distortion, no?

And these of ourse show us unequivacolly that markets are not efficient and freemarket-freetrading international communism needs draconian law to proscribe this robbery and draconian enforcement to purge these national wastrels of the nation and the economy.

Banks, record profits last year, why? Not from what they should do, but from stock market speculation, part of the W legacy under Paulson and too big to fail.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 10:43:05 AM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You still need to work on following your own advice, Hill.
1. Your statements and questions demonstrate that you haven't read the Market Analysis.
2. Why gripe about the KXL being built only for exports (which isn't true)?
3. Why did prices go up, then?

My statements have only been about those who lie to try to get what they want. They have nothing to do with the market analysis.
I wasn't griping about the KXL being for exports, I was griping about the lying by those trying to justify it (see a common thread here?)
Prices went up because of insider trading and speculation, not because of supply and demand as has been shown numerous times.
If supplies are higher, demand is lower and prices are going up, manipulation is the most likely suspect neh?

The State Dept. report justifies it being built. Did the State Dept. lie, too?

How does insider trading and speculation not factor into supply/demand curves? They are market distortion, no?

The state department report justifies it. (A lot of the hundred or so pages waffle on that) but I saw no lies in the report.

I simply saw data and interpretations.

As for insider trading and speculation, they are just about the opposite of pure supply/demand curves.

Regardless of the supply and demand for a given commodity, insider trading and speculation can drive the price in any direction they wish.

Applied Econ 101.

That's why insider trading is supposedly illegal.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 83

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 4:29:49 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
The state department report justifies it. (A lot of the hundred or so pages waffle on that) but I saw no lies in the report.
I simply saw data and interpretations.
As for insider trading and speculation, they are just about the opposite of pure supply/demand curves.
Regardless of the supply and demand for a given commodity, insider trading and speculation can drive the price in any direction they wish.
Applied Econ 101.
That's why insider trading is supposedly illegal.

The State Dept. recommended it being built.

Supply/Demand impact on prices still applies. The impact of insider trading, speculation, government intervention, theft, etc. still apply, too.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Hillwilliam)

Profile

Post #: 84

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 5:28:37 PM

LookieNoNookie

Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and why dont they??
you mean the building of it and the transfer is not of interest to canadians? it wont touch canadian lands, peoples homes, native lands?
really????
how fucking ignorant

It is of significant interest to Canadians that the American pipeline is built.

It does not however, change one grain of sand nor one ounce of oil that will be mined in Canada.

It can come through the United States and the U.S. can make money on it,or it can go to China through British Columbia.

That's how simple it gets.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 85

RE: R.I.P. Republican credibility: - 2/17/2014 7:38:35 PM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
The state department report justifies it. (A lot of the hundred or so pages waffle on that) but I saw no lies in the report.
I simply saw data and interpretations.
As for insider trading and speculation, they are just about the opposite of pure supply/demand curves.
Regardless of the supply and demand for a given commodity, insider trading and speculation can drive the price in any direction they wish.
Applied Econ 101.
That's why insider trading is supposedly illegal.

The State Dept. recommended it being built.

Supply/Demand impact on prices still applies. The impact of insider trading, speculation, government intervention, theft, etc. still apply, too.

But the state dept didn't lie as to the reason as to why it should be built.

Do I have to use the word "LIE" again as regards RW media?

That has been my entire thesis on this thread.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 86