CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Given what has been posted here before...and now... regarding slavery, my feelings have not changed much. On the one hand...there is the school of thought that someone in D/s and BDSM can call themselves what they wish. Whether or not someone (even the majority of someones) agrees with them, they can do so. I don't go along with this school...words mean what they mean, even when they are defined to fit D/s and BDSM. If you are not a slave in the dictionary sense, then you MIGHT be one in the D/s and BDSM sense...IF you go along with the constructed (granted that the construct is loose in some instances) definition. But if you choose to make up your own definition of what "slavery" is so that you can fit yourself into the word most appealing to you and your definition contains very few elements that others would see as defining of slavery, don't be surprised when someone calls you on it. And, hey folks? I am sorry but the school I've described above strikes me a little too much as free-wheeling, "rules don't apply to me", "I do what I want" (CARTMAN) D/s and BDSM. On the other hand, you have got those who want to use dictionary/quasi-legal definitions to structure D/s and BDSM without consideration of the true legalities regarding slavery. D/s and BDSM is, IMHO, a lifestyle structured around realistic tenets with some fantasy elements (some of which are illegal) thrown in. Being able to recognize the fantastical aspect from the realistic/legal one is something we should all be able to do. If you and your partner want to be Master/slave...as defined within D/s and BDSM sources that are credible (see Reading List) with some nuances of your own thrown in, then go for it. But please keep a space in your head for reality. YMMV...the above is my opinion only.
|