Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Christianity and BDSM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Christianity and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 5:44:54 AM   
pg4g


Posts: 296
Joined: 12/31/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
I kind of like the idea of this Jesus, even if I can't find much historical evidence for him, but that's beside the point. What he said (or supposedly said) meshes well with my own views.


It's the Jesus of history if you take away how the church twists things.

_____________________________

Switching: the best of both worlds.

It ain’t about how hard you hit. It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. - Rocky Balboa

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 5:51:58 AM   
SweetAnise


Posts: 480
Joined: 8/23/2013
Status: offline
To LadyConstanze: I can understand when you said Jesus stated he did not come to change the law but fulfill it and how bothersome it could be. When he was speaking as such he was trying to get his people to understand that he himself was the true word of G-d and wanted to take them (meaning the pharisees and sadducees) to a new level of understanding of what they were practicing in the OT and bring it to a new era. Many of the Pharisees did not like Jesus because he was preaching a new way of thinking, a new attitude, and new behaviors. The pharisees wanted to stay in control and in power. Jesus was fighting that power, but he gained attention by speaking in parables and catching the eye of a few Sadducees who started to follow him and ask questions. The Pharisees did not want to ask questions and didn't like the sadducees following Jesus. That could bring the end of their rule. Which ultimately began the start of making Jesus of Nazareth a criminal to silence him.

< Message edited by SweetAnise -- 3/6/2014 5:54:40 AM >


_____________________________

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us."-Marianne Williamson




(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 5:59:22 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

To LadyConstanze: I can understand when you said Jesus stated he did not come to change the law but fulfill it and how bothersome it could be. When he was speaking as such he was trying to get his people to understand that he himself was the true word of G-d and wanted to take them (meaning the pharisees and sadducees) to a new level of understanding of what they were practicing in the OT and bring it to a new era. Many of the Pharisees did not like Jesus because he was preaching a new way of thinking, a new attitude, and new behaviors. The pharisees wanted to stay in control and in power. Jesus was fighting that power, but he gained attention by speaking in parables and catching the eye of a few Sadducees who started to follow him and ask questions. The Pharisees did not want to ask questions and didn't like the sadducees following Jesus. That could bring the end of their rule. Which ultimately began the start of making Jesus of Nazareth a criminal to silence him.


This is a excellent post. TO the point, easy to understand. Even if this man didn't exist and was a myth, I love his ways so much, Id like to try to mimic them.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 6:06:01 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pg4g


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
I kind of like the idea of this Jesus, even if I can't find much historical evidence for him, but that's beside the point. What he said (or supposedly said) meshes well with my own views.


It's the Jesus of history if you take away how the church twists things.


Agreed (though still not a lot of historic evidence), but the church is an organization run by humans who have their own agenda which they want to further.

To SweetAnise: That is if you are taking the bible as the word of a deity, which I think is a bit crazy, considering that humans wrote it and there are tons of contradictions in it, it's not a history book that is checked for accuracy, it's a collection of stories written by a lot of different people with different agendas. Another issue I have is people cherry picking certain parts and ignoring others, simply because it suits them. By doing so a lot of them are acting very un-christian and if we assume for a moment that Jesus was a real person and that he gave the core value of "Love thy neighbour as you love thyself" and remove the plank of your own eye before you bother with somebody else's splinter, I can only imagine how disgusted that guy would be with what passes for christianity now.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to pg4g)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 6:54:07 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise
science has helped prove some occurrences in the bible. We know that Noah's Ark does exist and where. We know that Jesus did exist. We know Babylon existed. We also know that the old testament is based on Hebraic heritage. Jewish tradition. We know that Christianity wasn't started until the New Testament after Jesus died. Yes we know that slavery existed during that time based on the cultural traditions of that time. Greeks had slaves. Romans had slaves. Hebrews had slaves. Hebrews were slaves.

I won't argue your faith, but your assertions in this paragraph about scientific knowledge are false.

1. About Noah's Ark and Flood

The overwhelming scientific consensus about a worldwide flood is that there is no evidence of it happening. When you say "we know when and where" you may be referring to the claims of a single researcher -- someone who needs to be taken seriously, because he discovered the Titanic -- that there appears to have been a rapid water rise in an area of the Black Sea. His hypothesized explanation is that this may be the origin of the Noah's Flood story. Link here:

http://www.weather.com/travel/noahs-ark-flood-proof-20121212

While this is interesting, the historical fact remains that there were similar flood stories in other religions predating the writing of the Old Testament, so the simplest explanation is to apply what happened with the holy writings of other religions: they borrowed from previous creation stories and disaster stories.

2. Existence of Jesus

There is no hard evidence that Jesus existed. There is some historical evidence, but historical evidence is not the same as hard evidence. Remember that he was supposedly born into a poor family. Records of such people were not kept. So the lack of evidence does not argue for his nonexistence, so to speak, because you can barely prove anyone except emperors and generals existed in that time period. But there is absolutely nothing rising to the level of "21st century court of law evidence" that indicates Jesus really lived. For example, the people who wrote the Gospels were not even Palestinian. The main "non-Christian proof" mentioned for the existence of Jesus is his mention in a book by Josephus. However, many scholars believe that was forged, i.e., included by a scribe long after the original book was written, because of possible linguistic discrepancies.

Point being, the jury is out, and it probably will never come in. To expect scientific precision about a poor person thousands of years ago is probably too much to hope for.

By contrast, incidentally, there is good evidence that Pontius Pilate existed. He was mentioned independently in books by historians of the time. No reference to Jesus in those books, btw.

3. Jews as slaves in Egypt.

There is absolutely no evidence for this, despite the great interest in the subject. Points (1) and (2) do have scientists and historians who believe something like them is true. There is no scientific, historical or archaeological basis for (3) at all. Of course, that doesn't prove it didn't happen, but you were asserting that science proves it, which is false.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Egypt#Genesis_and_Exodus

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 7:41:16 AM   
SweetAnise


Posts: 480
Joined: 8/23/2013
Status: offline
To LadyConstanze: I do not speak about the viewpoint of Jesus being a deity but the history of that time. One can go online, search, and read that many historians have concluded that Pharisees and the Sadducees were the two significant and opposing power groups. Most historians do not believe in the Christ myth theory (which states that Jesus did not exist). Most agree to his baptism and his crucifixion. Although his existence is represented in most Christian sources, Jesus existence is also mentioned in non-Christian Jewish and Greco-Romans sources.

As for cherry picking. Religious people (including Islam, Judaism, and Christianity and others) often pick scriptures that best suits them. Some for the good and some for the bad. It could possibly that in their eyes it is their representation to what their religion means to them.

I do understand that there are extreme Christians out in the world. Humans who use religion as a way to harm and judge others. Yet, I do not make all Christians responsible for that. It is my job to differentiate between the good and not so good. I will not however put all Christians, or all Muslims, or all Jewish in the same group.

Thank you chatterbox24. :)


_____________________________

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us."-Marianne Williamson




(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 7:52:07 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
SweetAnise, you might have noticed that I mentioned several times organized religions, that goes for all religions, but the discussion here was Christianity specifically.

Since you interfere that I lump all of them into one group, may I ask you what gave you that idea?

RM: The issue with Jesus as a historical person is that Roman times and the Romans were the best record keepers ever (compare them to the IRS, because the main reason for their record keeping was taxes), somebody who caused quite such a stir as Jesus, I would think there would be historical references about such a person, a culture like the Romans wouldn't change the way they do things for a single person. During that time there were several guys running around claiming to be the Messiah, what I think is a logical explanation is that a lot of the teachings and deeds were all attributed to one. Similar to Attila, there were a bunch of them... Doesn't devalue the core message in the slightest, just removes the "mystic" element.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 7:59:09 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
RM: The issue with Jesus as a historical person is that Roman times and the Romans were the best record keepers ever (compare them to the IRS, because the main reason for their record keeping was taxes), somebody who caused quite such a stir as Jesus, I would think there would be historical references about such a person, a culture like the Romans wouldn't change the way they do things for a single person. During that time there were several guys running around claiming to be the Messiah, what I think is a logical explanation is that a lot of the teachings and deeds were all attributed to one. Similar to Attila, there were a bunch of them... Doesn't devalue the core message in the slightest, just removes the "mystic" element.

Businesses and noble-type people were counted; poor people weren't. This has the following interesting implication. Roman record-keeping proves one New Testament story false: the great census that required Mary and Joseph to return to Bethlehem in order to be counted. No such census took place, then or any other year, and no Roman edict ever required that families return to the towns of their birth. This false story is told in only one Gospel, by the author most concerned with ensuring the facts of Jesus's life match with the prophecies in the Old Testament. Since a prophecy mentioned Bethlehem, a fake census was created to ensure the geographic location was Bethlehem.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 8:19:23 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
I'm more on about the whole crucifixion thing, the Romans tended to keep good records about stuff, especially potential uprisings, they had to, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to keep their empire going for so long.

As for the census, I dimly remember from history lessons that actually the population counts (the censuses as there were several) included not only poor people but also slaves, free workers and all that, it didn't only have to do with the taxes but they also calculated the agricultural output, you got x amount of people living in a region, so they will need x amount of grain for themselves. Again, they needed to do all that stuff to be able to transport food from one end of their empire to the other, because a draught or starvation could easily lead to an uprising.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 8:25:10 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
No census mandating that people return to their place of birth. Sorry for not being clear. I agree there were some rough population counts. But still, the poor people were not named.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 8:29:08 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Oh the whole counting people by name, they would have had much bigger records. Wasn't even on about that. Again it's more the story about the crucifixion and the uproar, that they wanted Barnabas freed instead, I would have thought some incident like that would have caused enough waves to make it into their record keeping or at least some letters, as the Province of Judea was always quite a political hotbed for the Romans...

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 10:14:30 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
Perhaps you had other intents with your comments, but my comments are still related to the original posters questions and comments. I don't feel I was derailing the thread at all, but still speaking to a very specific aspect of the OP's comments.


I'm not trying to attack you personally, my response was meant to be general. Threads do drift, the drift on this one does seem to be a wide spread effort. I was just feeling bad for having given it a nudge early on.

< Message edited by GotSteel -- 3/6/2014 10:15:23 AM >

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 10:18:38 AM   
altoonamaster


Posts: 184
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
LADY CONSTANZE you might add it took 450 years to write the bible after he was saiud to be dead

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 10:37:10 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: altoonamaster

LADY CONSTANZE you might add it took 450 years to write the bible after he was saiud to be dead


I think I mentioned that most of the NT was written after the time when things supposedly happened, and oral legends don't tend to be the most reliable ones, it's a bit like Chinese whispers, but still, I don't think that it makes the core message less valuable, no issue with the message of being a compassionate human being.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to altoonamaster)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 5:20:02 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I will agree with this 100%. There is an evolution between OT and NT. When I read the OT, man of the passages, I cringe, but here is a lesson in them. Some I admit, I don't understand at all, and I will skip thru them and go back to them later. The NT has more care and love and teachings of tolerance and acceptance. I know these teachings are from a different time, a different culture, but there is a lot of practical daily teachings that work no matter how old the are. For anyone interested, Proverbs is the book of knowledge, Psalms is for comfort. I AM NOT PUSHING NOR TRYING TO CONVERT ANYONE. THese are just easier passages I myself can understand more easily.
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I personally think the major problem with different sides of the Christianity argument is that the OT and NT do not always correlate to one another and therefore you have people who take more after the OT than the NT and vice versa.

Personally I don't feel the OT and NT should be lumped together. I see them as completely separate from one another. And I think the lumping together of them both is what causes all the issues within Christianity.








And I'm just the opposite. I'm more of a believer in the OT than the NT. I only call myself a Christian because it's easier for people to grasp than to explain my religious beliefs that are closer to Judaism than Christianity but yet I am not a Jew.

For me the NT just doesn't sum up God to me. It sums up Christ and while I believe Jesus was a great prophet just like Buddha, Gandhi or Mohammed, I don't believe he was the Christ. So for me, because of that, the OT and NT are not related.

_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 9:40:15 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise

The bible and science often clashes with one another. However science has helped prove some occurrences in the bible. We know that Noah's Ark does exist and where. We know that Jesus did exist. We know Babylon existed. We also know that the old testament is based on Hebraic heritage. Jewish tradition. We know that Christianity wasn't started until the New Testament after Jesus died. Yes we know that slavery existed during that time based on the cultural traditions of that time. Greeks had slaves. Romans had slaves. Hebrews had slaves. Hebrews were slaves. The bible is tied to history, culture, and parables. Science can never truly be parallel to religion because while science is based on methodology what can be proven- Christianity is based on faith. Faith isn't often proven which interferes with science epistemology of clear cut answers of true or false.





Noah's ark exists? Really? We know it exists and where? Sorry, but that one is a whopper, the whole Mt. Arrarat/Ark thing is not true, period. The story of the ark is a piece of mythic drama, that among other things, is more than likely taken from the Sumerian Gilgamesh epic poem.

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 9:53:58 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise
science has helped prove some occurrences in the bible. We know that Noah's Ark does exist and where. We know that Jesus did exist. We know Babylon existed. We also know that the old testament is based on Hebraic heritage. Jewish tradition. We know that Christianity wasn't started until the New Testament after Jesus died. Yes we know that slavery existed during that time based on the cultural traditions of that time. Greeks had slaves. Romans had slaves. Hebrews had slaves. Hebrews were slaves.

I won't argue your faith, but your assertions in this paragraph about scientific knowledge are false.

1. About Noah's Ark and Flood

The overwhelming scientific consensus about a worldwide flood is that there is no evidence of it happening. When you say "we know when and where" you may be referring to the claims of a single researcher -- someone who needs to be taken seriously, because he discovered the Titanic -- that there appears to have been a rapid water rise in an area of the Black Sea. His hypothesized explanation is that this may be the origin of the Noah's Flood story. Link here:

http://www.weather.com/travel/noahs-ark-flood-proof-20121212

While this is interesting, the historical fact remains that there were similar flood stories in other religions predating the writing of the Old Testament, so the simplest explanation is to apply what happened with the holy writings of other religions: they borrowed from previous creation stories and disaster stories.

2. Existence of Jesus

There is no hard evidence that Jesus existed. There is some historical evidence, but historical evidence is not the same as hard evidence. Remember that he was supposedly born into a poor family. Records of such people were not kept. So the lack of evidence does not argue for his nonexistence, so to speak, because you can barely prove anyone except emperors and generals existed in that time period. But there is absolutely nothing rising to the level of "21st century court of law evidence" that indicates Jesus really lived. For example, the people who wrote the Gospels were not even Palestinian. The main "non-Christian proof" mentioned for the existence of Jesus is his mention in a book by Josephus. However, many scholars believe that was forged, i.e., included by a scribe long after the original book was written, because of possible linguistic discrepancies.

Point being, the jury is out, and it probably will never come in. To expect scientific precision about a poor person thousands of years ago is probably too much to hope for.

By contrast, incidentally, there is good evidence that Pontius Pilate existed. He was mentioned independently in books by historians of the time. No reference to Jesus in those books, btw.

3. Jews as slaves in Egypt.

There is absolutely no evidence for this, despite the great interest in the subject. Points (1) and (2) do have scientists and historians who believe something like them is true. There is no scientific, historical or archaeological basis for (3) at all. Of course, that doesn't prove it didn't happen, but you were asserting that science proves it, which is false.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Egypt#Genesis_and_Exodus



Your three points are valid. Flood myths exist in the mesopotamian region, the Sumerian gilgamesh predates the Noah story by at least a thousand years, and others have flood tales. The Mesopotamian flood plane (tigris/euphrate river basin) was prone to floods, and these likely are the basis for the myths including Noah. To the people there, it looked like the world had flooded....

And yep, there is no direct evidence of Jesus existing (I think he did exist, for a number of reasons, but there is no proof). Josephus is problematic, and as far as I know there are no Roman accounts of his crucifixion, official ones, so it is very hard to figure out if he existed from them. Likewise, other stories of Jesus, the killing of the 3 year old, the census that supposedly sent Jesus' parents to Bethlehem, have absolutely no historical records, either.

And the story of Exodus, or mass keeping of Jews as slaves in Egypt, has no history either, the egyptians kept very detailed records and histories, and there is no mention of any sizable population of Jews living in Egypt, or being slaves there. Some theories had Jewish slaves building the pyramids, which is even more off the wall, because they were built long before the story of exodus (and we now know they were not built by slaves at all).

Some things in the bible have been verified, soddom and gomorrah existed (no signs of any kind of major wipeout, though), Jericho existed (was sacked several times over the course of centuries), there is some history in there, mixed with all the religious stuff.

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/6/2014 11:48:49 PM   
SweetAnise


Posts: 480
Joined: 8/23/2013
Status: offline
To LadyConstanze: I suggested that all religious organizations cherry pick.

To njlauren: I concede the point that there have been many unsuccessful searches of Noah's ark that has gone unproven. However there has been recent discoveries from a British scholar that did find a 4000 year old tablet now located in Iraq that describes the biblical account of Noah ark. It also describes the ark itself.

To RedMagic: I did say that there were resources that discount Jesus existence and many sources that say he does. (Please reread my second post to LadyConstanze)

Hebrews as slave: Please note slaves in Egypt were not mentioned but Hebrew slaves were. Hebrews slave did exist and a Hebrew could become a slave if ordered by the court or if he gave himself over to bondage voluntarily. Their were laws that would need to be abided if one had a Hebrew slave and laws on how they were to be treated and terminated.

It is almost 3 am and I am off to bed.



< Message edited by SweetAnise -- 3/6/2014 11:50:49 PM >


_____________________________

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us."-Marianne Williamson




(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/7/2014 4:38:07 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

I won't argue your faith, but your assertions in this paragraph about scientific knowledge are false.




Sure you are, so why can't you at least be honest about it.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Christianity and BDSM - 3/7/2014 5:10:02 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetAnise
To njlauren: I concede the point that there have been many unsuccessful searches of Noah's ark that has gone unproven. However there has been recent discoveries from a British scholar that did find a 4000 year old tablet now located in Iraq that describes the biblical account of Noah ark. It also describes the ark itself.

This description is not accurate. Finkel (the discoverer/translator) is on record as stating that he believes no ark was ever built. The newly-translated tablet in the British Museum provides the earliest-known version of "In Case of Flood, Break Glass." To the best of current knowledge, it is the prototypic flood story, from which later flood stories, including that of the Ancient Hebrews, were copied. The tablet instructs to build a circular boat and to put animals on the boat two-by-two, long before Noah could have been born. The tablet does not describe an event that occurred, but rather explains what to do in case a flood might occur. It is not yet known whether the boat described would be water-worthy, but engineers are trying to figure that out.

< Message edited by RedMagic1 -- 3/7/2014 5:16:23 AM >


_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to SweetAnise)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Christianity and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094