RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 7:13:00 PM)

he wasnt

read the response from Ron about agreeing with DSatyr

it might help[:)]




kalikshama -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 7:35:19 PM)

quote:

I want you to understand that at $1.25 an hour my father raised four kids, bought a home, a car, a tv, and actually took small vacations,


http://stationsixunderground.blogspot.com/2013/02/90-of-americans-earn-less-than-1950.html#axzz2v9JsZrqD

...In 1950, the Federal minimum wage in the United States was set at 75-cents per hour. This meant that no matter what a person did for a living, according to national productivity standards for workers, their work was worth a minimum of 75 pennies for an hour worked, $30 for an average work week, or a little over $1560 a year. At that time, this was a bit more than the average cost of a brand new automobile.A worker could work all year, save every penny, and buy a brand new mid-grade car without taking out a loan.

In 2012, the average cost for an automobile was $30,748, slightly more than double what a minimum wage worker would be paid, before taxes, working full time.

Read more: http://stationsixunderground.blogspot.com/2013/02/90-of-americans-earn-less-than-1950.html#ixzz2v9L51A2n






cloudboy -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 7:37:56 PM)

Here is the problem:

If one is "libertarian" how can he agree with / approve of paying a living wage when his actions do not support paying such wages. A libertarian supports an unimpeded / unregulated free market which is the bulwark of poverty wages.

The minimum wage, workplace safety rules, 40 hour work week, child labor laws, overtime, unemployment benefits et. al. came against and in defiance of Libertarians --- and were all imposed by the US Federal Government upon the Free Market.

Lastly, its funny how Right Wingers do not want to admit they are Republicans. No, they classify themselves as "independents."

This reminds me of Owner's theme -- namely how Republicans want to disown GWB, who was their man for EIGHT YEARS enacting THEIR POLICIES. His very picture gets them upset.

I swear --- it is hard wrapping one's mind around it -- except for the greater hatred of Democrats.




subfever -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 7:52:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Jesse Ventura was giving the commencement speech for a BUDS class. (He was UDT) He went to McP's where there was an Irish wake going on for a Seal that died when he threw himself on a grenade to protect his team.

According to Seal lore, Jesse Ventura was against the war in Iraq and is said to have made a comment to the effect of "You deserve to lose a few". Chris Kyle struck him and left before the police could be called.

Jesse Ventura says it never happened. (which isn't a surprising stance because admitting he was knocked down in bar would ruin his reputation) The owner and staff at McP's has maintained the "we didn't see anything" stance (which isn't surprising because going either way would destroy the business) The majority of Seals that I've talked to maintain that Chris Kyle's version is closer to the truth.

There's an awful lot of smoke, for there not to be a fire and in the end, I choose to believe the Seals that live in that community and have better and more direct information.


I don't agree with a "Where there's smoke, there's fire" stance, and I've personally known people that have used it to get themselves excused from jury duty selection. However, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

In my opinion, Ventura is potentially a huge threat to the powers-that-be, so there may be powerful forces aligning against him. We'll have to see how this case plays out.

Here are the first two articles from a Google search, plus a cut and paste excerpt from Wiki... should anyone have interest:

http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2013/aug/07/citylights2-did-chris-kyle-deck-jesse-ventura/

http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_24871717/witnesses-who-saw-seal-sniper-punch-jesse-ventura

On January 4, 2012, Chris Kyle, a former U.S. Navy SEAL who had served in Iraq who had 160 confirmed kills and was thus the deadliest marksman in American military history,[119] promoted his recently released book American Sniper on the Opie and Anthony Show, the same radio show where Ventura got into a verbal altercation with a host two years prior. When Kyle was on the air, a listener called in and asked about how Kyle allegedly punched Ventura in a bar fight. After receiving the call, show host Gregg 'Opie' Hughes asked Kyle about the rumor. Kyle claimed that he punched Ventura in the face at a bar popular with Navy SEAL personnel in Coronado, California, for loudly expressing criticism of the Iraq War back in 2006 during a wake for Michael A. Monsoor, a Medal of Honor recipient and Navy SEAL who had been killed in action in Iraq the same year. According to Kyle, Ventura, who was present in San Diego to give a speech to a graduating BUD/S class, was "letting it known he did not agree" with the war in Iraq and was "bad-mouthing the war, bad-mouthing (former President) Bush, bad-mouthing America." Although Kyle, who wrote about the alleged incident in his book but did not mention Ventura by name, said he approached Ventura and asked him to tone down his voice because the families of SEAL personnel were present, Ventura allegedly said to Kyle that the SEALs "deserved to lose a few guys." Kyle said he responded by punching Ventura.[120][121] Kyle repeated his claims in a later interview with Bill O'Reilly on his show.

Following this interview, radio host Alex Jones interviewed Ventura on January 8 regarding what happened. During the interview, Ventura denied the rumors, saying he never met Kyle nor has he heard of him before. Ventura argued that had the confrontation occurred, Kyle would be admitting to assault and that the incident would have become known across the Navy SEAL community, as Ventura had been a member of the UDT/SEALs community. Ventura also stated that the bar, known as McP's, was owned by a former Navy SEAL who was his cadre instructor when in the military and that he would not misbehave at the bar. Because the rumors emerged as Ventura was traveling down to his second home in Mexico, Ventura felt that the story was released at that point so he would be unable to properly fight the allegations.[122]

After the Opie and Anthony hosts learned of Jones' interview with Ventura, they interviewed Kyle, who clarified his view of what happened and urged witnesses who were present at the bar to come forward to back his claims. Alex Jones, who is a friend of Ventura and was highly skeptical of Kyle's claims before his interview with Ventura, was also invited by the Opie and Anthony hosts to discuss the controversy. After Jones called in, an argument erupted over whether the incident happened, with the Opie and Anthony hosts siding with Kyle's version of events, and Jones siding with Ventura's. During the argument, Kyle denied claims by Jones that he was part of a bigger plot of discrediting Ventura and also suggested frustration over the attention on Kyle being focused on the alleged incident rather than on his book in general. Kyle also offered to meet with Ventura privately to end the dispute.[123] While Jones and the Opie and Anthony hosts were receptive to Kyle's proposal, no meeting between him and Ventura occurred.

Ventura, reiterating that the incident did not happen, posted a comment on his official Facebook page saying the following:

The event this man spoke of never happened. I have been to McP's many times since leaving the Navy. I was never there alone. I was always accompanied by other people. If this happened 6 years ago, someone would have known of it before now. Certainly in the UDT/SEAL community it would have been known. This has to be news to all of us. I have always opposed the war in Iraq but I have never spoken or wished any ill will towards the soldiers. My heart aches that soldiers have died or been wounded because this war should never have taken place. I am perplexed over the agenda this man has and why a fellow Navy Seal [sic] would tell a lie about an event that never happened. Clearly between this story and the previous week's story about supposedly getting pulled over for tailgaiting [sic] in CA that was also a lie, someone is out to destroy my credibility. I find it very interesting that both these stories are being spread by Fox news [sic] and it's [sic] affiliates. As a Navy veteran you realize you can’t believe every sea story you hear. Let me finish by stating both of the recent two national stories about me are completely untrue lies, neither event ever happened. Sincerely, Jesse Ventura.[124]





cloudboy -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 7:57:07 PM)


Good post. Thank you for putting this into the thread.




subfever -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 8:00:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Yea, I just love listening to rich people whine and bitch about other rich people. I guess his millions don't count.




quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

A bit hypocritical. A guy with a net worth well over 12 million dollars who doesn't like the 1 %'ers. Nice



Sigh... yes... let's hold our breaths and wait for some poor schmuck earning minimum wage to take on the existing power structure to effect real change... [8|]




subfever -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 8:06:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Good post. Thank you for putting this into the thread.



You're welcome, and thank you.




thishereboi -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/5/2014 8:11:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Here is the problem:

If one is "libertarian" how can he agree with / approve of paying a living wage when his actions do not support paying such wages. A libertarian supports an unimpeded / unregulated free market which is the bulwark of poverty wages.

The minimum wage, workplace safety rules, 40 hour work week, child labor laws, overtime, unemployment benefits et. al. came against and in defiance of Libertarians --- and were all imposed by the US Federal Government upon the Free Market.

Lastly, its funny how Right Wingers do not want to admit they are Republicans. No, they classify themselves as "independents."

This reminds me of Owner's theme -- namely how Republicans want to disown GWB, who was their man for EIGHT YEARS enacting THEIR POLICIES. His very picture gets them upset.

I swear --- it is hard wrapping one's mind around it -- except for the greater hatred of Democrats.




That was me and I did not get upset because he was posting the pics. I just commented that I found it amusing that he spends so much time posting pics of someone he hates. As to the rest of your post, you have made it clear that anyone who disagrees with you is not only a republican but evil and uncaring as well. Not a bit surprised you missed on DS this time.




joether -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 3:48:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
[1] The left sure do love their catchphrases. Define "a living wage", is it $20 an hour, $50 an hour, $Eleventy billion dollars an hour?

[2] Why the fuck should anyone pay a non skilled floor sweeper a "living wage"?
[3] What gives a non skilled worker the right to a high wage?
[4] Whats wrong with starting at the bottom and working your way up?
[5] Whats wrong with educating yourself, gaining skills and improving your earning potential?


[1] A living wage is one in which a person and live in a reasonable manner without the fear of busting their chops just to remain in poverty. The problem is when making so little there really isn't much room to save nor invest. Every penny and every dollar being used on an assortment of expenses. Rent, heating, food, care repairs, cloths, and maybe a few bucks for disposable cash. Why should one work day in and day out if they have no hope of ever rising above the slop they are forced into? That rising above it is only an illusion meant to keep the slaves in their places for life. Where as one in to top bracket can save and invest with practical ease, since all things cost the same. I could go over the micro economics here, but I will assume you understand the details, right?

[2] An the conservative right wonders why Unions form up. An how they acquire quite a diverse crowd of Americans that handle a very wide assortment of positions. Whether in the public or private sectors.

[3] They work hard with little complaint. They come to work early and leave when the job is done. They are good natured, able bodied and kind hearted. Skill is sometimes a matter of perception. Take any of the Tea Party idiots in Congress right now. Not one of them has achieved anything of use for all Americans, yet we pay them a staggering amount of money and benefits for having no real, useful, skill sets.....

[4] Go work in customer service for a decade. Your understand the answer very well.

[5] I know many people that how college degrees and STILL busting their chops to make ends meet. Poor college students are generally debt ridden individuals after they go a full semester without a 12 hour course load. Unlike a medical or financial debt, most student loans can not be removed due to bankruptcy. Those individuals have those loans until they are paid in full, or the die. While even a $40K debt might not seem like much, its plenty when your trying to afford rent, heating, cloths, car payments, gas, food, and health bills. This economy has been very bad on those with these sort of loans. There is very little upward mobility nor healthy raises for a number of years.

Quite honestly, I do not think you really understand the sort of people that find themselves in these positions. Maybe we should contact your employer and convince him or her to pay you at have the rate you are right now. Or better yet, find someone that will do your job at half the rate. I'm sure a lengthy stay of unemployment in this economy would give you a healthy dose of humility....




joether -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 4:01:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
Whats wrong with starting at the bottom and working your way up?
Whats wrong with educating yourself, gaining skills and improving your earning potential?

Not a damn thing.

What's right with the wealthy paying an effective tax rate of 15% while the 99% pay 29%?


54% of the population pays no federal income tax.

Might want to rework those numbers.


The depth of your ignorance is such that you would HIGHLY benefit from some Well Explained Information On the subject matter.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 6:24:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
That same "subjective" reasoning comes into question when you use the phrase, "competitive wage," too. What is "competitive?" Competitive wages are those wages that have to be paid to get the workers with the skills you need for the position you are filling. As a purposely ridiculous hypothetical meant for demonstration purposes only, if you need a secretary that can type 40 wpm, you will have to compensate at least as well as the next guy that has that same secretarial need. If that's $80/hr. or $8/hr., that is the competitive wage. If you can't find anyone with 40 wpm typing skills willing to work for what you're offering, you aren't offering a competitive wage. If you can find someone, then, you are offering a competitive wage.
If someone is willing to work for $X, then $X is a competitive wage, regardless of what $X is.

But that's my point, DS; companies don't compete . They don't have to pay the extra .50 ¢ to an otherwise "minimum wage" employee.
I don't really worry about the rich. They're doing fine.
I'd worry about the middle class, if we still had one.
What about the guy that makes $7.50 an hour at the WallyWorld who (I think) does deserve basic cable (because the cable companies have been interfering with TV signals for years); who does deserve to at least be able to have ground meat twice a week (I'm sure the USDA says that's about right).
I understand the debate about minimum wage but where did we turn into a society where people don't deserve what a good portion would consider to be basic "necessities". Yes, I know no one's dying without cable but, for some, it might enhance their downtime. Downtime is important to everyone; possibly more so for people who live under the stress of a paycheck-to-paycheck existence.


But, companies do compete. It might not be cut-throat and difficult, but they still compete. And, they compete when the pickin's are slim, too. Recall McD's offering new hires $10/hr. to work? I mean, seriously?!?

I can't believe you have just commented that we should raise the minimum wage so hourly workers who work the least skilled jobs and have the least amount of skills, can have a more productive non-work time. Shouldn't they concern themselves with making their work time more productive, and getting paid more for it?




hlen5 -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 8:15:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
Whats wrong with starting at the bottom and working your way up?
Whats wrong with educating yourself, gaining skills and improving your earning potential?

Not a damn thing.

What's right with the wealthy paying an effective tax rate of 15% while the 99% pay 29%?


54% of the population pays no federal income tax.

Might want to rework those numbers.


The depth of your ignorance is such that you would HIGHLY benefit from some Well Explained Information On the subject matter.


Thank you SO MUCH for that link! That clarified some things for me, too.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 3:27:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

I can't believe you have just commented that we should raise the minimum wage so hourly workers who work the least skilled jobs and have the least amount of skills, can have a more productive non-work time. Shouldn't they concern themselves with making their work time more productive, and getting paid more for it?



"workers who work the least skilled jobs" are probably breaking their fucking backs, physically.

While I agree that while they're on the clock, they belong to the company, they (like the doctors, lawyers, and Indian chief) deserve to be able to unwind and basic cable shouldn't necessarily be an unattainable goal.

The very idea that it's okay to treat "workers with the least skilled jobs" somehow differently than others (at a basic level) is a little offensive and it makes me hope I never see you on the other side of an interview desk.







MercTech -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 4:11:58 PM)

In 2000 I did a little exercise. The first job I had that had taxes taken out was in 1973. I was working for minimum wage which was $1.91/hr in those days. I took that and did an increase by the Federal Government's official inflation rate each year. Hmm, if minimum wage has increased for inflation, it would have been $46/hr in 2000. Food for thought. Inflation has eaten our economy and left us with the slops.
I also remember something from 9th grade Social Studies. We were studying third world countries and their economic situations. There seemed to be some common denominators among the failed economies in the third world. The first was that over 80% of the money supply was controlled by less than 10% of the population. Another common denominator was that the water supply was not trusted and the population needed to drink bottled water to feel safe.
Call the tea baggers if you want but if you look behind the popular press rhetoric you find a disgust at decades of government irresponsibility and broke commitments perpetrated by both parties in Congress.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 7:02:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I can't believe you have just commented that we should raise the minimum wage so hourly workers who work the least skilled jobs and have the least amount of skills, can have a more productive non-work time. Shouldn't they concern themselves with making their work time more productive, and getting paid more for it?

"workers who work the least skilled jobs" are probably breaking their fucking backs, physically.
While I agree that while they're on the clock, they belong to the company, they (like the doctors, lawyers, and Indian chief) deserve to be able to unwind and basic cable shouldn't necessarily be an unattainable goal.
The very idea that it's okay to treat "workers with the least skilled jobs" somehow differently than others (at a basic level) is a little offensive and it makes me hope I never see you on the other side of an interview desk.


Interesting you attempt to put me opposite the idea that people deserve time off for leisure. Nowhere have I stated otherwise.

Basic cable is attainable. You have to decide where your money goes, and, the less of it you have, the stronger your grasp of where your money is going should be. You might not be able to afford the latest mobile phone, cable, new(or newer) cars, computers, clothes, etc. You will likely be able to afford at least some of those things, but that's where things get more difficult. There has to be a priority set on each item, with the highest priority placed on the thing you need most. My older brother didn't get cable because they decided that it was better for my sister-in-law to stay at home with their kids. They couldn't afford everything they wanted on just his salary, so they scaled back. Her staying home was a very high priority. Cable was not.




slavekate80 -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 8:08:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

In 2000 I did a little exercise. The first job I had that had taxes taken out was in 1973. I was working for minimum wage which was $1.91/hr in those days. I took that and did an increase by the Federal Government's official inflation rate each year. Hmm, if minimum wage has increased for inflation, it would have been $46/hr in 2000. Food for thought. Inflation has eaten our economy and left us with the slops.


The inflation is pretty bad, but I don't think it's THAT much. I remember the price of a candy bar at the drugstore going from 45 cents to 50 cents around 1985, and those same candy bars are usually around $1.29 now. Based on what I can recall (I watched game shows with my grandmother... I was a weird kid), it seems that the dollar retained roughly a third of its value between the early 1980s and 2014. $1.91 in 1973 being $46.00 in 2000 sounds way off.

I plugged it in on this calculator and $1.91 in 1973 is $7.41 in 2000 dollars and $10.06 in 2014 dollars: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1.91&year1=1973&year2=2000

For minimum wage to keep pace with what it was in the early '70s, then, it would have to go up to about $10 today, not $46 fourteen years ago.




slavekate80 -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 8:09:58 PM)

delete, double post




MercTech -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/6/2014 9:11:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekate80


The inflation is pretty bad, but I don't think it's THAT much. I remember the price of a candy bar at the drugstore going from 45 cents to 50 cents around 1985, and those same candy bars are usually around $1.29 now. Based on what I can recall (I watched game shows with my grandmother... I was a weird kid), it seems that the dollar retained roughly a third of its value between the early 1980s and 2014. $1.91 in 1973 being $46.00 in 2000 sounds way off.

I plugged it in on this calculator and $1.91 in 1973 is $7.41 in 2000 dollars and $10.06 in 2014 dollars: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1.91&year1=1973&year2=2000

For minimum wage to keep pace with what it was in the early '70s, then, it would have to go up to about $10 today, not $46 fourteen years ago.


I didn't use the dollar conversion but the posted inflation index incremented each year. Now, can you rely on government statistics?

Ok, candy bar standard it is. How about a 1.5-2 oz Zero bar. I loved em as a kid.

1968 5 cents each or six for a quarter
1978 25 cents
1988 50 cents
1998 79 cents
2008 $1.19
2014 $1.39

It really depends on what you look at. So much of the inflation today got its start with the Enron manipulation of fuel prices and supply. We have a 400% increase in fuel prices at the pump since 1999. (approximately... 3.99/0.99 x 100 = about 400%)
Wages don't keep pace with inflation and that erodes savings and cripples the ability to save or even pay the routine bills.




cloudboy -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/7/2014 11:10:29 AM)


. THE Irish singer Bono once described a difference between America and his native land. “In the United States,” he explained, “you look at the guy that lives in the mansion on the hill, and you think, you know, one day, if I work really hard, I could live in that mansion. In Ireland, people look up at the guy in the mansion on the hill and go, one day, I’m going to get that bastard.”

-----

we must recognize that fomenting bitterness over income differences may be powerful politics, but it injures our nation. We need aspirational leaders willing to do the hard work of uniting Americans around an optimistic vision in which anyone can earn his or her success. This will never happen when we vilify the rich or give up on the poor.

I thought this ^^^ was well stated.

NYT





Lucylastic -> RE: Ventura Slaps the 1% Hard (3/7/2014 11:18:07 AM)

Id love to see more co ops or workers businesses become popular.
startup and growing it is hard tho without the fucking backs and assorted other assholes getting hold of it




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.201172E-02