Tkman117
Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking Yes, keep in mind that Obama tried to close Gitmo - and the Radicals blocked him. And he tried to end the war in Iraq - but the Radicals fought him tooth and nail. Best laid plans of mice and well-meaning Democrats, I suppose. I realize that this may come as a shock, DNAV, but incompetence isn't an excuse, it's still a fucking FAIL. He made the promise, probably meant it, but didn't have the skills to get it done. Didn't have the skills? You mean catering to the right wing demands? You do remember what happened the last time the conservatives didn't get what they wanted right? They shut down your government. If you're saying incompetence isn't an excuse, then how about people who oppose the president as a good excuse? You got to realize that ya, Obama made a lot of promises, some of which he tried to follow through on but was stopped short by a republican dominated congress. I'm not saying Obama is a great president and that he isn't guilty for breaking promises, all politicians do that (not to mention I generally dislike him over many policies, drones being one of them). But you got to look at the big picture and look at the CAUSES for why Obama hasn't kept his promises. Does he not care? Did he lie? Or has he tried to do things but has been impeded by his political opponents? Chances are there are examples of all three, but you got to look at it by a case by case issue and not generalize. Are you SURE about that? Because history seems to record that there was a Democratic majority in both the Senate and the House. ...um, first off you should probably work on your grammar. Second there is and has been a republican majority during Obama's congress, not to mention it has been the least active congress in a long time and has obstructed Obama's efforts at almost every opportunity. Could you quote your historical sources please? 111th Congress (6 January 2009, to 3 January 2011) Senate: 55 Democrats; 41 Republicans; 2 Independents - Illinois and Minnesota "vacant" House: 256 Democrats; 175 Republicans Okay, so you're quoting the last congress, gotcha. A congress which enacted a lot of different legislation, more so than this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress#Major_legislation Should Obama have gone through on ALL of his promises in that time span? Thats 2 years, and I'm not sure how fast you think a congress can pump out legislation but it's not quick. Compared to the 4 years of obstructionist congress, the connection is thin, but of you have a stronger explanation please go ahead. But also remember we're getting off topic, don't want heretic to get annoyed at us
< Message edited by Tkman117 -- 3/8/2014 1:23:55 PM >
|