Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama Care


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Care Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 10:16:38 AM   
GoddessManko


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/6/2013
From: Dante's Inferno
Status: offline
My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.

_____________________________

Happy consent is the name of the game. You are my perfect Mistress. - my collared.

http://submissivemale.blogspot.com/

The Bird of Hermes is my name, eating my wings to make me tame.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 9:14:41 PM   
evesgrden


Posts: 597
Joined: 6/9/2012
Status: offline
quote:


Your article, using cherry picked time frames, cherry picked data points (GDP, inflation, whatever) attempts to make the assertion that the country does better under democrat administrations than republican ones.




No, that wasn't my assertion at all. You really need to read what's being said and not assume the worst of people and their motives.

I repeat ... you spoke of "dimocrats" and expansion. The point of the graph was that plenty of expansion happened at the hands of the Republicans. There was no value judgement on the spending and expansion; just pointing out who did it and that your slam was misplaced. I wasn't saying that Republicans were bad people because of it, or that they were wrong to do it. I merely pointed out how this was at odds with your "dimocrat" slam.

I later said that I could argue in favor of some of that for goodness sake. For example the arms race and Reagan brought Russia to its knees. Money well spent and we're reaping the benefit on our very laptops and phones because of all that today too. Military expansion and it was a good thing; but it was certainly expansion, very pricey, and it sure wasn't a Democrat at the helm.

No I haven't read the rest of your post yet because I wanted to get this cleared up. But I was not picking on Republicans, I was picking on what you said and pointing out the error of it.

I really have no interest in finding out or bragging about how cold the water is let alone how deep.

_____________________________

What you permit, you promote.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 9:27:30 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Score in Colorado:

84,000 people signed up.

249,000 people cancelled.

Net: 160,000 people lose insurance. And of course tax payers are on the hook for the subsidies.


And is there a source to which your acquiring all of these numbers from?

Curious of all this is how uninformed the average American is on the topic. It was not the President who cancelled those policies, nor the Democrats. It wasn't the Republican/Tea Party (shocking, eh?). It was not even the ACA. No, the group to blame for the cancellations are the lawyers that worked directly or indirectly for the insurance companies. Basically the insurance companies got really good advise that the new health care law placed new rules on how insurance is bought, maintained, and managed in the United States. The law stated criteria that had to be met for a particular plan to remain in effect after the Jan 1, 2014 deadline. Those plans that met this criteria were 'grandfathered' under the law.

However, those plans that remained had differing levels of 'grey matter' to be sorted out. The lawyers advised their clients that any amount of 'grey matter' could land the company into a bad court case in which the judge/jury rules in favor of the insurance company's clients (i.e. the people holding the polices). Obviously, none of these insurance companies wanted any sort of 'grey matter' that could interfere with their primary business purpose: making a profit. So the plans were cancelled out and others created using the new set of rules to potential customers. This is stuff not heard from by most Americans, even though after hearing it, most nod their head and understand it makes good business sense. Those that have an obvious agenda to this business understanding, will claim the cancellations are not how I just stated, but some weird conspiracy to undermine the health of every American in the country (or some other crack-pot and/or flaky idea in fantasy).

Those people that lost their insurance because the insurance companies ended them, will have to pick up a new insurance plan or settle for a penalty.

It is important to note not every state took the expanded Medicaid plan. Many of the 'red states' opted out in 'protest' of the ACA. Meanwhile their citizens will simply suffer all manner of problems. The biggest is the Cost to the States Themselves. I've heard that thanks to the 'brilliant minds' in the Florida Republican party, the 4th hospital in that state has closed due to funding issues. The sort of funds that would have been used through the expansion of Medicaid....




I'm sorry. This entire post is false. The insurance company canceled my policy because it did not meet the Obamacare standards for the same price. They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost.

That is in a nutshell what is happening and you must have missed that information when it came out months ago. Obama apologized not because the insurance company lawyers and the tea party caused problems but because it finally came out that he was wrong about keeping your coverage and your doctor. Recent events and executive orders to keep those policies open were just a smoke screen since it was not financially viable to do so.

On the Medicaid expansion, all states realized the expanded cost of expanding this coverage for the poor would be put back on the states within two to three years. All states know it will cripple them financially down the road. The blue states had to get on board. The red states are free to do the best thing and not do something they cannot pay for down the road, a refreshingly sensible concept. BTW, November is coming.

< Message edited by Arturas -- 3/18/2014 9:31:04 PM >


_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 9:42:48 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: evesgrden


dimocrat? my my

How I shall ever sleep again after such a thought provoking rebuttal?

Fortunately I like to rely on hard data. It speaks for itself.





Still Cherry picking:

Publishing graphs of spending is rather pointless. We spend money on actions and policies.
The real question is, generally, are we happy with the results of the how money was spent.

Very high percentages of Americans would say they were happy with the policies of Reagan, Clinton and Bush I.

Under Reagan, the Soviet Union disitengrated; the berlin wall was brought down. We saw the beginnings of nascent Europe.

Bush saw the technological inovation of the internet.

Clinton had welfare reform.

Most people are dissatisfied with how our money was spent under carter, Bush II, and Obama.
So making pretty pictures and pretending that those pictures are ANYTHING other than points designed to score political points is a lie.





Clinton actually reduced Federal Spending overall and balanced the budget. He however did increase spending for law enforcement and other non-give away domestic programs and maintained the military at strength. He is no fool.

So, that graph must be focused on military and non-domestic Federal spending, yes. So naturally Reagan won the cold war with lots of dollars, Clinton the war on crime, Bush fought back the rogue states and terrorist organizations and so what have we here with Obama, yes just as one would think, almost flat Military spending with a little bit to continue Bush's big push in Afghanistan to win there but then flat with all the increased spending on buying votes and that is strangely absent in the graph. Typical Left wing smoke and mirror. MSNBC would be proud of you, "evesgrden".

< Message edited by Arturas -- 3/18/2014 9:44:24 PM >


_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 9:50:50 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.



I'm happy she has my money and she and you will vote Democrat so you can continue to do so. Any state that redistributes wealth from those who earned it to those who did not will fail because eventually there will be no more money to redistribute. But, enjoy my money while you can and although I do want your mother to obtain insurance I would rather she pay ten dollars a month and obtain coverage under a GOP plan that does not need to rob me of my hard earned wages but instead reduces insurance and health care costs so your mother can afford insurance and I can afford to keep on working.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to GoddessManko)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Obama Care - 3/18/2014 9:55:47 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
...yes, continuing that thought a bit, I pay about eight percent of my working wages for my health premiums. I suspect 59 cents a month is much less that eight percent of her SS or retirement or wages or general income. Plus, I get to pay more taxes to support that nonsense. Guess what, that will not work and it is not working so tell your mother not to get too used to this but any new plan will still be affordable, but this time for everyone and not just your mother.

< Message edited by Arturas -- 3/18/2014 9:56:32 PM >


_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 4:40:27 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

I'm sorry. This entire post is false. The insurance company canceled my policy because it did not meet the Obamacare standards for the same price.
So you had catastrophic care insurance?

They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes (like viagra and vasectomy??? oh thats right, women have been paying to cover them for years) and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost. Then that has nothing to do with obamacare and all to do with your not wanting to pay for womens healthcare and pediatric care, which Im surprised at, seeming your "family condition")

BTW, November is coming.
yes it is and then the righties will be hiding out again for three months, like the chicken shits they are..

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 4:45:14 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Why should my tax dolllars pay for someone with a sub-standard policy who then requires catastrophic levels of care not covered in said policy...?


"If canceled, not even 1% will pay more for Obamacare: Study"



http://www.cnbc.com/id/101068119

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 5:07:07 AM   
Phoenixpower


Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.



I'm happy she has my money and she and you will vote Democrat so you can continue to do so. But, enjoy my money while you can and although I do want your mother to obtain insurance I would rather she pay ten dollars a month and obtain coverage under a GOP plan that does not need to rob me of my hard earned wages but instead reduces insurance and health care costs so your mother can afford insurance and I can afford to keep on working.



jeeeesh... always "funny" to read, how lifethreatening it seems to be for many americans, to "share."

That explains well why we have disabled americans over here as well as some with horrendous cancer past stories, who don't want to return to america....as they feel, that they can't afford a decent life if they dare to return (under the previous system...) in case their cancer returns...

Yep, that sounds like a "great" success of the past insurance system...that folks feel the need to move into other countries as they can't afford the previously extraordinary health costs in the US...

I never had any issue with the taxes we have to pay here to fund our healthcare....but am also glad to know, whatever happens to me (with granny and mum having had cancer in recent years) I will not lose my home... I pay into it but also, in times of need, get the benefits out of it...damn what a hard concept


_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 5:08:47 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
I'm sorry. This entire post is false. The insurance company canceled my policy because it did not meet the Obamacare standards for the same price. They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost.


OH....something happens to you that is different from the major of other policies, that means my whole post is wrong.

It states right in the ACA that a health insurance policy can NOT be offered if it costs differently due to age and/or gender. These are not the only two criteria for why policies would have been cancelled either (there a bunch more). The problem I suspect is the legal writing of the policy made it impractical to alter to be 'in-line' with the new law's definitions and requirements. You can blame the President, Democrats and the law all you want, but its the lawyers of the insurance company that made the final call to remove the policy from the books. That's a hard truth, as I know your stance on the President, Democrats and the law itself. I'm not saying this to bash you, but saying your fury is being directed towards the wrong entities in this specific case.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
That is in a nutshell what is happening and you must have missed that information when it came out months ago. Obama apologized not because the insurance company lawyers and the tea party caused problems but because it finally came out that he was wrong about keeping your coverage and your doctor. Recent events and executive orders to keep those policies open were just a smoke screen since it was not financially viable to do so.


The President apologized for not having enough visibility on future events based on decisions that were not within his realm of control or knowledge. Many Americans (yourself included) misunderstood what the President was apologizing on. He wasn't apologizing for lying about '...if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor...'. He was apologizing that so many insurance policies were cancelled due to lawyers making very good cases for the policies removal. That an the industry sharing notes before the shedding of many policies. When I read that bill, I figured a good 50% of policies would get 'canned'. While the percentage was higher, I can understand the reasoning behind it. No business person wants to leave their assets and profitability open to endless court cases that go in the favor of those suing for damages.

I'm not trying to apologize for the President. He's an adult, he can handle himself. I'm just explaining exactly what he was apologizing on. Its one thing to apologize for being caught in a lie that is proved with evidence. Its quite a bit different when apologizing for not having perfect knowledge of future events that would not exist for at least 2-3 years.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
On the Medicaid expansion, all states realized the expanded cost of expanding this coverage for the poor would be put back on the states within two to three years. All states know it will cripple them financially down the road. The blue states had to get on board. The red states are free to do the best thing and not do something they cannot pay for down the road, a refreshingly sensible concept. BTW, November is coming.


So the good citizens suffer, while the Republican/Tea Party pat themselves on the backs? During a bad economy in which jobs are scarce, income from those jobs has been decreasing, and the cost of living is rising faster than most see as bonuses in the same time frame. The purpose of the expansion was to offset the costs during the bad economy, so that when the economy was better, the 'whammy' would not be felt as much. Most likely down that same road, other people would devise a better way for this logistics engine to operate more efficiently from a government spending viewpoint.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 5:14:24 AM   
GoddessManko


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/6/2013
From: Dante's Inferno
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.



I'm happy she has my money and she and you will vote Democrat so you can continue to do so. Any state that redistributes wealth from those who earned it to those who did not will fail because eventually there will be no more money to redistribute. But, enjoy my money while you can and although I do want your mother to obtain insurance I would rather she pay ten dollars a month and obtain coverage under a GOP plan that does not need to rob me of my hard earned wages but instead reduces insurance and health care costs so your mother can afford insurance and I can afford to keep on working.


I'm pretty sure my mom has paid and still pays A LOT more in taxes than you since she owns SEVERAL properties in different states, several in this state alone and she has worked as a nurse since she was 18 years old. Don't insult my family, she doesn't even have time to be on CM like you do because of constraints. This is why no one votes for your party anymore. :)

_____________________________

Happy consent is the name of the game. You are my perfect Mistress. - my collared.

http://submissivemale.blogspot.com/

The Bird of Hermes is my name, eating my wings to make me tame.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 5:15:02 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.

I'm happy she has my money and she and you will vote Democrat so you can continue to do so. Any state that redistributes wealth from those who earned it to those who did not will fail because eventually there will be no more money to redistribute. But, enjoy my money while you can and although I do want your mother to obtain insurance I would rather she pay ten dollars a month and obtain coverage under a GOP plan that does not need to rob me of my hard earned wages but instead reduces insurance and health care costs so your mother can afford insurance and I can afford to keep on working.


How little you understand things. First there is the 'Money Market Apparatus' that is in effect. I'm not going to even try to explain how that beast operates. Take two years of college level economics while studying the financial and market forces in any of a dozen industries against all the industries they do business with and against. If your head doesn't explode from frustration or brain matter oozes from your nose....you'll understand the concept.

Let's just say, for simplicity sake, that if what you stated was true in that apparatus, the Defense Industry would have collapse upon itself back in the 1960s....

Further, its not your money going to pay for that grandmother's health insurance. More likely your tax dollars went to pay for toilet paper on aircraft carriers. Unless of course you can prove beyond a shadow of doubt were each and every one of your tax dollars actually went. Good luck!

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 7:48:50 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

I'm sorry. This entire post is false. The insurance company canceled my policy because it did not meet the Obamacare standards for the same price.
So you had catastrophic care insurance?

They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes (like viagra and vasectomy??? oh thats right, women have been paying to cover them for years) and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost. Then that has nothing to do with obamacare and all to do with your not wanting to pay for womens healthcare and pediatric care, which Im surprised at, seeming your "family condition")

BTW, November is coming.
yes it is and then the righties will be hiding out again for three months, like the chicken shits they are..



Viagra and vasectomy? I don't know, I never checked. Like birth control and abortion coverage. Stick an aspirin between your legs and save us a lot of things.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 7:53:25 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
My mom is paying 59 cents a month and was initially quoted for over $300 a month. This is with BCBS under Obamacare. She is 63. Tax credits to cut the cost, tremendously.

I'm happy she has my money and she and you will vote Democrat so you can continue to do so. Any state that redistributes wealth from those who earned it to those who did not will fail because eventually there will be no more money to redistribute. But, enjoy my money while you can and although I do want your mother to obtain insurance I would rather she pay ten dollars a month and obtain coverage under a GOP plan that does not need to rob me of my hard earned wages but instead reduces insurance and health care costs so your mother can afford insurance and I can afford to keep on working.


How little you understand things. First there is the 'Money Market Apparatus' that is in effect. I'm not going to even try to explain how that beast operates. Take two years of college level economics while studying the financial and market forces in any of a dozen industries against all the industries they do business with and against. If your head doesn't explode from frustration or brain matter oozes from your nose....you'll understand the concept.

Let's just say, for simplicity sake, that if what you stated was true in that apparatus, the Defense Industry would have collapse upon itself back in the 1960s....

Further, its not your money going to pay for that grandmother's health insurance. More likely your tax dollars went to pay for toilet paper on aircraft carriers. Unless of course you can prove beyond a shadow of doubt were each and every one of your tax dollars actually went. Good luck!


Thanks for clearing that up. So, I don't understand since the money for your mother's 59 cent a month coverage comes from a pot of gold (or borrowing from the Fed) and my tax dollars pay only for toilet paper. Incredible.



< Message edited by Arturas -- 3/19/2014 8:22:08 AM >


_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 7:56:08 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So you had catastrophic care insurance?

They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes (like viagra and vasectomy??? oh thats right, women have been paying to cover them for years) and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost. Then that has nothing to do with obamacare and all to do with your not wanting to pay for womens healthcare and pediatric care, which Im surprised at, seeming your "family condition")

BTW, November is coming.
yes it is and then the righties will be hiding out again for three months, like the chicken shits they are..



Viagra and vasectomy? I don't know, I never checked. Like birth control and abortion coverage. Stick an aspirin between your legs and save us a lot of things.


I had my tubes tied 24 years ago, but i understand you and tammy have a lil one in the fold, so yanno it covers any problems she may have, or god forbid the bairn. She and your child will be covered by ALL obama care policies.
WIll you have a vasectomy now? or will she have her tubes tied? or go on birth control, or ride bareback?
cos someone is paying in for YOUR decision too.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 7:58:23 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
Geeze. Now I know why Obama was voted into office. We are doomed unless we take the vote away from those who don't pay taxes because they also don't know or care what they are doing to the country as a whole. The basic truth known by the Founding Fathers are If you don't pay for it you don't care for it. That thinking works with teenagers and the "gimme free stuff" voters. So, if I turned my finances over to my teen age children who don't earn it and/or to my brother who is not working and does not want to then I can be assured they will do a good job with them, that is what we are doing when we allow people who do not pay taxes to determine how those taxes are spent.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 8:20:45 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So you had catastrophic care insurance?

They could not upgrade the coverage for gender specific attributes (like viagra and vasectomy??? oh thats right, women have been paying to cover them for years) and so they were forced to cancel and offer a more expensive policy but it was the best deal we could get for the overall reduced coverage and higher deductible and so we as a company resourced with another insurance plan for higher cost. Then that has nothing to do with obamacare and all to do with your not wanting to pay for womens healthcare and pediatric care, which Im surprised at, seeming your "family condition")

BTW, November is coming.
yes it is and then the righties will be hiding out again for three months, like the chicken shits they are..



Viagra and vasectomy? I don't know, I never checked. Like birth control and abortion coverage. Stick an aspirin between your legs and save us a lot of things.

quote:


I had my tubes tied 24 years ago, but i understand you and tammy have a lil one in the fold, so yanno it covers any problems she may have, or god forbid the bairn. She and your child will be covered by ALL obama care policies.
WIll you have a vasectomy now? or will she have her tubes tied? or go on birth control, or ride bareback?
cos someone is paying in for YOUR decision too.




Tammy is fertile and I have the seed she needs and will continue that situation until we decide differently because we pay for it and nobody else.

My current Aetna commercial coverage pays for births and is not ever subsidized by anyone but the other premium payers in our risk pool. It is a commercial plan and we are not subsidized by taxpayers. We pay our equal share of the costs and so we don't pay less so others can pay more. We pay our own way.

We are considering another child and if we do then we will pay our way also with a combination of Aetna insurance and our health savings account that we pay into monthly for our needs when they occur.

Sorry to disappoint you with that answer but that is the way people responsible for their own way do things. We are in control and do not take from others to pay for our decisions or our future health issues.


_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 8:24:33 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
...nor do we vote for someone who would allow us to take from others without paying our fair share.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 8:28:11 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
sorry I come from "reasonable countries," who do give a shit about the health of every citizen, your claim is bogus.

you pay into insurance or you pay in full directly to the hospital? Unless you pay cash, the truth is, every insurance plan is built on a pool of people
ANY insurance plan
And by having children, without paying the full cost to providers, you are having them pay for your fecundity.
Use an aspirin between the legs your self
Both of you!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Obama Care - 3/19/2014 9:07:01 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas




Clinton actually reduced Federal Spending overall and balanced the budget.



This is a commonly held lie.

Clinton never actually "balanced" the budget. What he did was take Social Security obligations off book. Up until that point social security obligations were on book.

So clinton's "balanced budget" was hundreds of billions in deficit. Google it.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Care Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188