Phydeaux
Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote:
ORIGINAL: MercTech If you check history; Crimea has more cultural ties to Russia then Ukraine. Crimea tried to leave Ukraine and become a Russian province in the 1850s and a war was fought to force them to stay with Ukraine. Again, Crimea is trying to leave Ukraine and attach itself to Russia. And, again, Western European countries are trying to keep Crimea as part of the Ukraine. Will the U.S. go to war in yet another country to force people to do what they don't want to do. It's not as simple as that though. Crimea's economy is dependent on Ukrainian subsidy, food and energy. Russia doesn't even have a land bridge to Crimea -- the Red Army built a bridge decades ago that promptly fell to ice floes, and hasn't been able to reconstruct it since. Russia promised higher pensions, but is going to have a hell of a job supplying goods, as they will all have to come by ferry. I'm amused that some posters are crying for the U.S. to defend Ukraine, with whom we have no defense treaty, as a criticism of Obama. Wanna bet had he gone in guns blazing, they'd be bitching about us being the world's policemen? This is Russia. We can't just push them around. Reality bites. I don't advocate defending the Ukraine. I do advocate helping them so it never comes to pass they need to be defended. Look, fundamentally, crimea is mostly russian speaking. Its all a power game however. How much of the Ukraine are we gong to stand by and let russia take? Do things now, so that the end position isn't a total invasion of ukraine - or the confiscation of the SE third of the country.
|