freedomdwarf1
Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders I think we all kinda-sorta know abuse when we see it, as evidenced by the fact that we frequently tell people to stand up for themselves and walk away from bad situations. But many of the police, social workers and domestic abuse support workers don't have our background and our first hand experience to make those judgement calls. So perhaps some sort of research and clarification would be extremely beneficial in advising those front-line workers. Agreed. The hostility isn't against the research but the methodology and base of that research. OP states in her first post: "Purpose of the research is to get an idea of the occurrence and extent of abuse linked to BDSM activities and/or the BDSM community. The underlying question is to what extent and under what circumstances people might abuse the power differential that is inherent to BDSM.". My contention is, and openly admitted by herself, there is no difference between BDSM and r/l. She is putting a skewed spin on just BDSM and I don't believe that harvesting opinions from a forum is going to better her research or her outcome. Why do we in this community sense when there is abuse?? because it is based upon the evidence presented and that certain types of behaviour are abuse regardless of BDSM or kink. That is facts, not opinion. Sure, we spin all sorts of opinion based on what we are told, and some of it is very different. But on the whole, we recognise the abuse by the actions of a person, not opinions. Opinions are "I think" and are not fact. Supporting evidence maybe, but still not fact. quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders It is worth asking what support is available to practitioners of BDSM. Like it or not, it would make a difference. If I took on a client in an abusive relationship that had started as a D/s dynamic or involved BDSM play, I'd have to take that into account. Since when has informed consent gone bad need to be taken into account as a separate entity?? Generally speaking, we agree to consensual sex when we get married, but we can still be raped within a marriage! I don't see BDSM as any kind of 'special case' in this regard. quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders I'd have to pro-actively ensure any police officers or social workers becoming involved had the relevant information. I'd have to prepare this person for the possibility that these intimate details would be raised in court and may possibly affect their odds of prosecution. That would be the same for any sort of consensual activity that ended up on the wrong side of abuse. As for the police and social workers, most people don't get the choice of who is assigned to the case, so that's a moot point. Certain counselling services, you would have a choice. But for the others, you wouldn't usually. quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders I don't know this woman, this programme, or even this university. Maybe the study will be ineffective. But I think the hostility to the whole notion of a study is bizarre. No one is trying to belittle or scapegoat the BDSM community, judging by everything that has been said here. I'm in favour of anything that holds the possibility of better outcomes for DV victims. Denying any difference is short-sighted at best. I quite agree. But get the facts from victims in DV shelters, not opinions from a BDSM forum. What I'm ultimately saying is, the problem is the source of her information, not the study itself.
|