BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for? With this incarnation the gun will not fire unless the hand holding the weapon has a "watch" on that wrist sending out an enabling signal. I will not presume to speak for everyone but for starters I don't have any faith in the technology. Second I oppose it being made mandatory, particularly at this early stage of development. The main effect of this, as I see it, would be to to make firearms too expensive for all but the wealthy. Has anyone anywhere tried to make it mandatory? NO! Your paranoia is showing. Kcsub brought up the question of making it mandatory, not me. In fact while you must not realize it, but you jumped in on the response to his claim that making it mandatory would save thousands of lives. you might want to check this smartgunlaws.org/gun-policy
< Message edited by BamaD -- 5/3/2014 7:24:21 PM >
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|