eulero83
Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD The fact is that the antigun people always assure us that the armed citizen will increase casualties period,,, <snip> That's not quite right. What us anti-gun people say is... if the populace didn't have guns in the first place, these gun situations just wouldn't arise to be debated. Ergo, the argument about a citizen being armed or not is moot and irrelevant. That's in fact correct. Instead, britvas, baseball bats (don't know that Burgess had a word for them), bit of the 'ole ultra violence would be used to dispense with the unarmed, defenseless innocents. can you at least admit it takes more effort to kill someone with a baseball bat than with a gun and it's not the same thing?
|