freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Another poitless gun death. (8/29/2014 7:40:56 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten And I think such a law would be stupid and not do anything to actually help the problem. Kids still drink under age they still smoke underage and they still drive cars underage the laws haven't prevented this from happening or deaths from occurring because of this happening. Why put in place a law that's inneffective and not going to prevent the perceived problem from happening. Instead charge the parents that are being careless with child endangerment and the rate of kids playing with harmful things be it guns knives bug spray a bathtub will drop. Instead of placing the blame on the parents where it's deserved your placing the blame on guns. Place the blame where the blame is deserved Don't use the tool as the excuse. Yes, deaths will always happen to those stupid enough to mis-use/abuse certain things. There isn't a law, anywhere, that actually stops those deaths happening. After all, what is a law?? It's nothing more than a bunch of words written on some piece of paper that a lot of people won't agree with. If a law says you aren't allowed to drink until you're at least 21, that isn't going to physically stop an 18yo misfit from doing so, is it?! And laws are only ineffective if they are consistently broken with impunity by lawless citizens. So your arguments don't hold water apart from stating the bleedin' obvious!! [8|] But hey, a lawless society isn't one that I'd like to live in. What laws do, is to outline the consequences and actions should you be caught breaking such laws and they (the laws) collectively attempt to keep society livable and vaguely honest. As for apportioning blame, underage people are not considered legally responsible for their actions. And, if the 'child' happens to mis-use something when not physically in the company of their parents/guardians, are those adults automatically to carry the blame and punishment of the actions of their child?? In most cases, people wouldn't agree with that. So, if your kid steals the neighbour's car and kills someone while driving the stolen vehicle - who takes the blame?? The parents?? I don't see why they should as they weren't responsible for the lack of security on the neighbour's car. The neighbour?? The kid should keep his hands in his pockets and not go stealing other people's property! The offending child?? Probably the most reasonable assumption. And, surprisingly enough, most laws are enacted with 'the tools' to which they apply to. To use your own examples, "guns, knives, bug spray, etc" and the restrictions for people on how/where/when/who are able to use them. So it's quite appropriate to enact laws against the guns and the how/where/when/who is able to use them. See how that works?? [:D] Probably not because you seem to like a lawless society.
|
|
|
|