thishereboi -> RE: Another poitless gun death. (8/29/2014 5:21:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail That aint what he said, but you go boy, nice strawman. Then maybe you can explain what he meant when he said "keeping kids completely away from such items" and "and that would include the teaching/handling of weapons until they reached the designated age." because it sure sounds like he thinks it should be illegal to teach someone how to safely use firearms till they reach that magic age. Unless of course you plan on teaching them with videos and books and not let them actually see a gun. Because that won't encourage them to take a look when they are alone. Yea, good plan. quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail We have drawn the line at the age of majority for most things as being 18. Not perfect, I know. For more dangerous things, alcohol, handgun ownership and so on, the bar is set at 21. Imperfect, but sort of where we are cooking our beans these days. Incorrect you can buy a gun from a private seller in the majority of states at 18. Tweak posed the question of laws to stop children being 'exp18osed' to such weapons, not the owning of them. I interpret that as keeping kids completely away from such items (like tobacco & booze etc) and that would include the teaching/handling of weapons until they reached the designated age. So by your assessment it should be illegal to teach someone how to safely use firearms till 18. That is silly. I will not bother with quotes, dumbasses not being capable of the most basic English comprehension. You people gotta quit taking fucking stupid pills, you are already shitbreathing imbeciles. In other words, no you can't explain it. Thanks for clearing that up.[8|]
|
|
|
|