SadistDave
Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Here's a spoiler: There were 3 primary partners and about 20 minor members of an outfit known as the "Axis". The 3 core members had distinctly different reasons for their aggression. Being from Australia, I'd have thought they might have taught you about the Pacific theater of WW2, which had not one fucking thing to do with the war in Europe. I don't know where you're getting 55 million as a death toll for WW2, and I don't really care.
Perhaps she was refering to the @55 million people that the nazi's murdered and not the total number of deaths in the war which was quite a bit more than 55 million.
Since she's considerably more intelligent than you, I bet she could clear up the mystery if she wanted to without relying on your unsubstantiated bullshit. I can cut her some slack for forgetting to post a link for reference. She's generally pretty good about it, and I'm sure she's actually done some minimal research. However. you don't seem capable of ever providing anything to back up your ignorant claims.
Like in this entire conversation for example...
quote:
The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia cites 70 million deaths as a result of WW2, with over half of the death toll occurring in the Pacific Theater. Lets call it an even 50% for simplicity and call it 35 million deaths we can blame on the Nazis.
Which shows how ignorant you are. the russians lost about 25 million the jews about 6 million. Is it your contention that only 4 mllion more died in the whole african,european campagn?
No link, irrelevant question.
quote:
The lowest estimate I've seen for Communist mass murder in the 20th century is 70 million. Wikipedia cites between 85 and 100 million.
As you point out that is a estimate which neither wiki nor you seems able to validate. Where as in amerika the number of dead native americans,blacks and browns and yellows are quite well known and documented.
I constantly wonder if your parents dropped you on your head once too often. An unvalidated claim which is LOWER than a referenced claim is hardly worth pissing your little panties over. The unvalidated claim is still HIGHER than the unvalidated numbers she provided, you moron. The number provided by the link is still HIGHER than both numbers.
Since you claim to have the documentation, please provide evidence that native americans, blacks and browns and yellows have been rounded up in large numbers so the American government for the express purpose of racial, ethnic, or religious genocide in the last 100 years.
quote:
Clearly, Hitler was a piker.
Fifty millions plus or minus would not a piker make.
Again... no link. This claim of 55 million people killed by Hitler's Germany appears to be something out of your ridiculous imaginings.
quote:
But that brings us to Islam and 100 years of mass murder in the 20th Century. By the time you add up the mass murders and genocides attributed to Islam in various wars and acts of genocide, the number is staggering. Muslims started the 20th Century in the middle of an ongoing genocide. Between 1897 and 1922 the Ottoman Empire under Islamic rule killed some 3.5 million Christians in Asia Minor. Between 1904 and 1915 1.3 million people were slaughtered in Armenia alone. Hitler claimed it was his model for the Holocaust.
Actually it was the amerikan use of "reservations" (pow camps according to defense department documents.) for the native americans that hitler commented on so favorably.
Actually it was both, but why quibble. People contest the "Armenian Quote", but it appears in transcripts of a speech by Hitler that was used as evidence in the Nuremburg Trials. It also appears in at least one book commissioned by the British government (Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939). Since you don't apparently know how to do your own research, I'll make this easy for you. The quote you're referring to is attributed to Mein Kampf. I don't remember it, but I haven't read it in over 30 years. However, I'm willing to accept that it is there just to move this along.
quote:
I have no doubt that if you add up the varied and sundry genocides, honor killings, war casualties, and terror victims of the world wide Islamic Regimes between 1900 and 1999, the total will be considerably more than 35 million. 3000 people here.... 500k there... a cool million over there... these things add up over the course of a century.
If you could prove such an assanine thing you would have posted it.You cant so you did not. Just more of your typical mindless bullshit.
Okay dumbass.... what do you think the words "I have no doubt" might suggest. Actual thinking people would understand that whatever statement follows is a belief or an opinion. Perhaps cultivating a working knowledge of conversational English should be more of a priority for you than trying in vain to sound like you have more than a room temperature I.Q.
quote:
I'm really not sure what your point is about slavery, considering the largest ongoing slave trade today is perpetrated by Islam in North Africa. Whining about sex slavery in the Bible is pretty poorly timed too,considering the recent events in Rotherham by Islamic rape gangs, and the fact that sexual slavery is condoned in the Quran as well as the Bible.
The primary disconnect here seems to be your inability to come to grips with the fact that Christians are no longer running slave trades in the 21st Century. Nor are they using their religion as an excuse to rape little girls
Catholic priest seem to prefer little boys
like Muslims have done in Britain, Canada, France, Switzerland, the U.S. and (you guessed it) fucking Australia. But then, unlike the Prophet Muhammad, Jesus Christ was neither a slave trader or a pedophile.
He was a sex cadet and a switch hitter who liked to have little children sit on his lap...not unlike michael jackson.
Awwww.... were you touched inappropriately by Jesus? Don't bother answering. I really don't care. Well, that's not entirely true. I actually kinda hope you were...
quote:
Whether or not these people are "representative" of Islam is wholly irrelevant. What IS relevant is that unlike any other dominant religion in the world, these people keep cropping up to commit atrocities of all kinds over and over and over again.
You say that these people are not representative of islam but then go on to say that they are...doesn't it hurt your mouth to talk out of both sides of it at the same time?
I'm sorry, when did I say anyone was "representative" of Islam? Oh, wait! I didn't. You're just too fucking stupid to understand the written word. I would ask if that hurts you, but these little exercises with you have made me believe that you post your ignorant bullshit out of some masochistic need to be ridiculed.
quote:
Meanwhile Islamic apologists like you, Politesub, and a few other loony liberals here seem to be unable to grasp the simple fact that there is something fundamentally wrong with a religion that is literally operating under Medieval laws and principles in the 21st Century.
Like the christians do?
Please provide a link as evidence that people in the 21st century (that's the year 2000 to now) have been beheading people of different religions, engaged in genocidal enterprises, intentionally flown airplanes into buildings, or formed combat units for conducting military offensives in the name of Jesus Christ.
(That should be entertaining.)
-SD-
_____________________________
To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!
|
RE: Racism and Islamophobia. - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread