Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gop trying to break science education again


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gop trying to break science education again Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/5/2014 9:49:57 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

The author complains that the gains disappear by the fourth grade. Logically then the place to look is after Pre-K. Why aren't the kids advancing at the same pace or at least maintaining? The reason for that is well known, the 180 day school year and long summer vacation.

You're just making shit up. The reasons for the fade-out effect are far from clear, let alone "well known," and among the factors that do appear to be correlated the length of the school year is conspicuously absent.

Head Start Research and Evaluation, Final Report, August 2012

K.


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/5/2014 10:24:02 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
Aylee, he can't give you a cite because there isn't one to be found. Not with googling his ratio of mentally ill conservatives to mentally ill leberals nor with the simple, non-biased phrase "number of mentally ill conservatives versus number of mentally ill liberals". There is:

A survey (a hint...higher numbers on the bad side for democrats)
www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/what-your-politics-say-about-your-mental-health

An article:
www.neuropolitics.org/anxiety-depression-and-goal-seeking-in-conservatives-liberals-moderates.htm

Another article, not specifically about mental illness but about a type of mental health. Comes from William F Buckley's magazine:
www.nationalreview.com/articles/253768/why-unhappy-people-become-liberals-dennis-prager

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 9/5/2014 10:26:02 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/5/2014 10:41:42 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Aylee, he can't give you a cite because there isn't one to be found. Not with googling his ratio of mentally ill conservatives to mentally ill leberals nor with the simple, non-biased phrase "number of mentally ill conservatives versus number of mentally ill liberals". There is:

A survey (a hint...higher numbers on the bad side for democrats)
www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/what-your-politics-say-about-your-mental-health

An article:
www.neuropolitics.org/anxiety-depression-and-goal-seeking-in-conservatives-liberals-moderates.htm

Another article, not specifically about mental illness but about a type of mental health. Comes from William F Buckley's magazine:
www.nationalreview.com/articles/253768/why-unhappy-people-become-liberals-dennis-prager


Sadly he is also stigmatizing those with mental issues.

Conservatives are bad in his world. The mentally ill are mostly conservative (according to him). Therefore the mentally ill must be bad too. I can do this as a logic statement as well.

It is no different from the types of statements such as:

"That's so autistic." "That's so handicap" "That's so amputated." "That's so black". "That's so Asian". "That's so Latino." "That's so middle aged" "That's so teenager" "That's so bald" or "That's so obese" when somebody is implying that something is negative.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 4:46:57 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

The author complains that the gains disappear by the fourth grade. Logically then the place to look is after Pre-K. Why aren't the kids advancing at the same pace or at least maintaining? The reason for that is well known, the 180 day school year and long summer vacation.

You're just making shit up. The reasons for the fade-out effect are far from clear, let alone "well known," and among the factors that do appear to be correlated the length of the school year is conspicuously absent.

Head Start Research and Evaluation, Final Report, August 2012

K.



Head Start isn't the only program that is under discussion dumbass. And early childhood achievement drop off is separate from an issue of Head Start since the problem occurs with pre-K kids that don't attend Head Start.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 4:54:32 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Common core was put in place by the department of education which is a federal program if Im not mistaken...

and the standards are bullshit

Nope. It was developed by the National Governors Association. The feds had nothing to do with it.


quote:


Examples of CC Standards

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.A.2
Explain patterns in the number of zeros of the product when multiplying a number by powers of 10, and explain patterns in the placement of the decimal point when a decimal is multiplied or divided by a power of 10. Use whole-number exponents to denote powers of 10.

Basic to understanding multiplication

quote:

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.4
Understand that a two-dimensional figure is similar to another if the second can be obtained from the first by a sequence of rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations; given two similar two-dimensional figures, describe a sequence that exhibits the similarity between them.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.5
Use informal arguments to establish facts about the angle sum and exterior angle of triangles, about the angles created when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, and the angle-angle criterion for similarity of triangles.

basic geometry

quote:

They also allow for no deviation for the way other people might learn:

For example Division is taught currently in 6th grade, that you are to manually do a problem as follows

6/150

Six times 10 is 60 six times 20 is 20 six times 25 is 150 so 6/150 is 25 and you are to do multiplication and add your numbers up in a guess instead of going

6 goes into 15 twice with the remainder of 3, bring down the zero and you have 30 six goes in to 30 5 times, the answers 25.

Because of this instead of being able to do 10 to 20 math problems in an hour course you might be able to do 3 or 4, which means less practical skill is taught, you also spend longer explaining the "cc standard way" then the normal long division way, and if you deviate in most schools in my state as an example your given an F even if you come to the correct answer.

That stuff is not in the CC standard. Your state may have that stuff in but that is not the fault of CC. You quoted the CC standards above and they include nothing about how a specific item is to be taught. Just that it is to be covered and in which grade and in roughly what order. BTW division is taught long before 6th grade. The standard starts teaching it in 3rd grade.

The great thing about the standards is that people can go read them and see through all the negative hype.
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

You can easily see for yourself that there is no 6th grade requirement remotely like what you quoted.

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 5:53:59 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Aylee, he can't give you a cite because there isn't one to be found. Not with googling his ratio of mentally ill conservatives to mentally ill leberals nor with the simple, non-biased phrase "number of mentally ill conservatives versus number of mentally ill liberals". There is:

A survey (a hint...higher numbers on the bad side for democrats)
www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/what-your-politics-say-about-your-mental-health


It could be due to the fact that Democrats are more inclined to support social programs and mental health treatment, so those who already have those conditions might tend to support the Democrats out of self-interest. Being mentally ill does not make one stupid or completely out of touch with reality.

Of course, both sides might make a lot of hay about the other side being mentally ill, simply because they hold opposite viewpoints. I don't really view it as a serious argument or a positive advocacy of either a conservative or liberal position. Disparaging the other side is too easy.



(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 6:01:41 AM   
ElChupa


Posts: 117
Joined: 11/14/2009
Status: offline
OH NO, NOT THOSE PESKY 'PUBLICANS AGAIN WITH ALL THEIR QUESTIONS! Haven't they heard of settled science? I mean, nobody questions, especially if leading scientists like biden, obama, and algore all agree on stuff! Questioning settled science like global warming/cooling just confuses people! All those other scientists who question should be sent to re education camps and stuff and be made to listen to Barack Hussein 0bama's (AKA, "The Big Zero") greatest speeches and then watch a blooper reel from Vice Emperor "Crazy Uncle Joe" Biden!

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 6:16:09 AM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Common core was put in place by the department of education which is a federal program if Im not mistaken...

and the standards are bullshit

Nope. It was developed by the National Governors Association. The feds had nothing to do with it.


quote:


Examples of CC Standards

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.A.2
Explain patterns in the number of zeros of the product when multiplying a number by powers of 10, and explain patterns in the placement of the decimal point when a decimal is multiplied or divided by a power of 10. Use whole-number exponents to denote powers of 10.

Basic to understanding multiplication

quote:

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.4
Understand that a two-dimensional figure is similar to another if the second can be obtained from the first by a sequence of rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations; given two similar two-dimensional figures, describe a sequence that exhibits the similarity between them.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.5
Use informal arguments to establish facts about the angle sum and exterior angle of triangles, about the angles created when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, and the angle-angle criterion for similarity of triangles.

basic geometry

quote:

They also allow for no deviation for the way other people might learn:

For example Division is taught currently in 6th grade, that you are to manually do a problem as follows

6/150

Six times 10 is 60 six times 20 is 20 six times 25 is 150 so 6/150 is 25 and you are to do multiplication and add your numbers up in a guess instead of going

6 goes into 15 twice with the remainder of 3, bring down the zero and you have 30 six goes in to 30 5 times, the answers 25.

Because of this instead of being able to do 10 to 20 math problems in an hour course you might be able to do 3 or 4, which means less practical skill is taught, you also spend longer explaining the "cc standard way" then the normal long division way, and if you deviate in most schools in my state as an example your given an F even if you come to the correct answer.

That stuff is not in the CC standard. Your state may have that stuff in but that is not the fault of CC. You quoted the CC standards above and they include nothing about how a specific item is to be taught. Just that it is to be covered and in which grade and in roughly what order. BTW division is taught long before 6th grade. The standard starts teaching it in 3rd grade.

The great thing about the standards is that people can go read them and see through all the negative hype.
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

You can easily see for yourself that there is no 6th grade requirement remotely like what you quoted.



Except your link isnt whats provided to the schools for them to use. Its what I quoted as well because its easily available, but its not whats given to a school to follow common core.


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 7:17:12 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Common core was put in place by the department of education which is a federal program if Im not mistaken...

and the standards are bullshit

Nope. It was developed by the National Governors Association. The feds had nothing to do with it.


quote:


Examples of CC Standards

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.A.2
Explain patterns in the number of zeros of the product when multiplying a number by powers of 10, and explain patterns in the placement of the decimal point when a decimal is multiplied or divided by a power of 10. Use whole-number exponents to denote powers of 10.

Basic to understanding multiplication

quote:

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.4
Understand that a two-dimensional figure is similar to another if the second can be obtained from the first by a sequence of rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations; given two similar two-dimensional figures, describe a sequence that exhibits the similarity between them.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.5
Use informal arguments to establish facts about the angle sum and exterior angle of triangles, about the angles created when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, and the angle-angle criterion for similarity of triangles.

basic geometry

quote:

They also allow for no deviation for the way other people might learn:

For example Division is taught currently in 6th grade, that you are to manually do a problem as follows

6/150

Six times 10 is 60 six times 20 is 20 six times 25 is 150 so 6/150 is 25 and you are to do multiplication and add your numbers up in a guess instead of going

6 goes into 15 twice with the remainder of 3, bring down the zero and you have 30 six goes in to 30 5 times, the answers 25.

Because of this instead of being able to do 10 to 20 math problems in an hour course you might be able to do 3 or 4, which means less practical skill is taught, you also spend longer explaining the "cc standard way" then the normal long division way, and if you deviate in most schools in my state as an example your given an F even if you come to the correct answer.

That stuff is not in the CC standard. Your state may have that stuff in but that is not the fault of CC. You quoted the CC standards above and they include nothing about how a specific item is to be taught. Just that it is to be covered and in which grade and in roughly what order. BTW division is taught long before 6th grade. The standard starts teaching it in 3rd grade.

The great thing about the standards is that people can go read them and see through all the negative hype.
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

You can easily see for yourself that there is no 6th grade requirement remotely like what you quoted.



Except your link isnt whats provided to the schools for them to use. Its what I quoted as well because its easily available, but its not whats given to a school to follow common core.



I linked to the actual standards. Like I wrote your state might have created really crappy standards based on common core but that isn't the fault of common core that is your state's fault. Tell me which state and I'll look into that as well but I've already shown you that common core isn't the problem.

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 12:25:39 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElChupa
OH NO, NOT THOSE PESKY 'PUBLICANS AGAIN WITH ALL THEIR QUESTIONS! Haven't they heard of settled science? I mean, nobody questions, especially if leading scientists like biden, obama, and algore all agree on stuff! Questioning settled science like global warming/cooling just confuses people! All those other scientists who question should be sent to re education camps and stuff and be made to listen to Barack Hussein 0bama's (AKA, "The Big Zero") greatest speeches and then watch a blooper reel from Vice Emperor "Crazy Uncle Joe" Biden!


Hey critical thinking is great and I wish a very significant portion of conservatives would learn how to do it however that's not the same thing as trolling for Jesus. The time to "teach the controversy" is when there's an actual scientific controversy.

(in reply to ElChupa)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 1:10:09 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Head Start isn't the only program that is under discussion dumbass. And early childhood achievement drop off is separate from an issue of Head Start since the problem occurs with pre-K kids that don't attend Head Start.

Stop digging, Ken, you're getting your clown suit dirty.

K.


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 2:10:55 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
It could be due to the fact that Democrats are more inclined to support social programs and mental health treatment, so those who already have those conditions might tend to support the Democrats out of self-interest. Being mentally ill does not make one stupid or completely out of touch with reality.

Of course, both sides might make a lot of hay about the other side being mentally ill, simply because they hold opposite viewpoints. I don't really view it as a serious argument or a positive advocacy of either a conservative or liberal position. Disparaging the other side is too easy.


I'd also worry about self reporting skewing the survey as Evangelical Christians (a significant portion of the republican party) are the most prone to over reporting their mental health and well being. Which is why studies that rely on self reporting find a mental health benefit to religiosity where as actually checking up on participants mental health records finds the opposite that religiosity correlates with depression: http://epiphenom.fieldofscience.com/2013/05/religion-doesnt-seem-to-protect-against.html

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 2:48:39 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

studies that rely on self reporting find a mental health benefit to religiosity where as actually checking up on participants mental health records finds the opposite that religiosity correlates with depression: http://epiphenom.fieldofscience.com/2013/05/religion-doesnt-seem-to-protect-against.html

Unfortunately for you, the study you linked relies on self-reporting.

K.


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 5:17:15 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3

@Joether

It's not my article. Unless I'm mistaken, It was written by an Indian woman. I haven't even read it yet, I just stumbled upon the link to it a little while before I saw this thread. Figured it was relevant, so I thought I'd share. Also, you have too much time on your hands...

@DomKen

Piss off, commie!

Emphasis mine.

Nothing says "I'm a credible poster" quite like linking to pieces you haven't bothered to read.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to LetstalkboutRAP3)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 5:27:30 PM   
subrosaDom


Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Common core was put in place by the department of education which is a federal program if Im not mistaken...

and the standards are bullshit

Nope. It was developed by the National Governors Association. The feds had nothing to do with it.


quote:


Examples of CC Standards

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.A.2
Explain patterns in the number of zeros of the product when multiplying a number by powers of 10, and explain patterns in the placement of the decimal point when a decimal is multiplied or divided by a power of 10. Use whole-number exponents to denote powers of 10.

Basic to understanding multiplication

quote:

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.4
Understand that a two-dimensional figure is similar to another if the second can be obtained from the first by a sequence of rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations; given two similar two-dimensional figures, describe a sequence that exhibits the similarity between them.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.5
Use informal arguments to establish facts about the angle sum and exterior angle of triangles, about the angles created when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, and the angle-angle criterion for similarity of triangles.

basic geometry

quote:

They also allow for no deviation for the way other people might learn:

For example Division is taught currently in 6th grade, that you are to manually do a problem as follows

6/150

Six times 10 is 60 six times 20 is 20 six times 25 is 150 so 6/150 is 25 and you are to do multiplication and add your numbers up in a guess instead of going

6 goes into 15 twice with the remainder of 3, bring down the zero and you have 30 six goes in to 30 5 times, the answers 25.

Because of this instead of being able to do 10 to 20 math problems in an hour course you might be able to do 3 or 4, which means less practical skill is taught, you also spend longer explaining the "cc standard way" then the normal long division way, and if you deviate in most schools in my state as an example your given an F even if you come to the correct answer.

That stuff is not in the CC standard. Your state may have that stuff in but that is not the fault of CC. You quoted the CC standards above and they include nothing about how a specific item is to be taught. Just that it is to be covered and in which grade and in roughly what order. BTW division is taught long before 6th grade. The standard starts teaching it in 3rd grade.

The great thing about the standards is that people can go read them and see through all the negative hype.
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

You can easily see for yourself that there is no 6th grade requirement remotely like what you quoted.



The way most of those standards are stated is appalling. It's barely understandable. The whole powers of ten stuff is worse than God-awful. "Patterns in the number of zeros"? -- You should be teaching relationships, not a pattern, which sounds arbitrary.

And that explanation of 6x10 sounds like a great technique to break prisoners in Guantanamo. At the least you would say: If you have, e.g., 6x10, then by the commutative property of multiplication, the order does not matter. Therefore, we can write 10x6.

As far as division goes, you want to teach that 150/6=25 and therefore since you now have 6 pieces of 25 each that must be what you started with. To verify that, simply put them back together. Multiple 6x25 and indeed you get 150. You can now apply that the other way. If you divide 150/25 you get 6, meaning 25 separate pieces of 6. Multiply to put them back together again. The difference in my explanations is that I provide some basis for why these things are true instead of just throwing random numbers out there. Ideally you would ultimately treat these cases with variables, showing that for any x/y = q, that qy = x and in higher math using this as a way to prove the irrationality of numbers where x/y does not exist as a representation for the underlying number. CC or whatever this mess is fails to do any of that.

_____________________________

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

- Nietzsche

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 5:29:55 PM   
subrosaDom


Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElChupa

OH NO, NOT THOSE PESKY 'PUBLICANS AGAIN WITH ALL THEIR QUESTIONS! Haven't they heard of settled science? I mean, nobody questions, especially if leading scientists like biden, obama, and algore all agree on stuff! Questioning settled science like global warming/cooling just confuses people! All those other scientists who question should be sent to re education camps and stuff and be made to listen to Barack Hussein 0bama's (AKA, "The Big Zero") greatest speeches and then watch a blooper reel from Vice Emperor "Crazy Uncle Joe" Biden!


Well, in their defense, they are always right. Al Gore said the polar ice cap would be gone by this year. Now, I know it appears that rather than having disappeared, it's actually growing by leaps and bounds, allowing the polar bears fertile hunting grounds, but that's just an illusion. The reality is that there is no polar ice cap at all and all the melted water has been placed into the brains of now hydrocephalic Democrats.

_____________________________

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

- Nietzsche

(in reply to ElChupa)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 5:58:11 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom


The way most of those standards are stated is appalling. It's barely understandable. The whole powers of ten stuff is worse than God-awful. "Patterns in the number of zeros"? -- You should be teaching relationships, not a pattern, which sounds arbitrary.

It's not exactly the most wonderful prose ever granted but it's quite difficult to express certain mathematical concepts in pure English.

quote:

And that explanation of 6x10 sounds like a great technique to break prisoners in Guantanamo. At the least you would say: If you have, e.g., 6x10, then by the commutative property of multiplication, the order does not matter. Therefore, we can write 10x6.

That stuff isn't in the standard thankfully.

quote:

As far as division goes, you want to teach that 150/6=25 and therefore since you now have 6 pieces of 25 each that must be what you started with. To verify that, simply put them back together. Multiple 6x25 and indeed you get 150. You can now apply that the other way. If you divide 150/25 you get 6, meaning 25 separate pieces of 6. Multiply to put them back together again. The difference in my explanations is that I provide some basis for why these things are true instead of just throwing random numbers out there. Ideally you would ultimately treat these cases with variables, showing that for any x/y = q, that qy = x and in higher math using this as a way to prove the irrationality of numbers where x/y does not exist as a representation for the underlying number. CC or whatever this mess is fails to do any of that.

That is taught, in 3rd grade. It's covered in a standard on the operations and algebraic thinking. It's then built on over the course of the next several years into actual algebra much earlier than is generally seen in most schools which to me is a good idea.

Anyone interested should go look at the actual standards and not just believe the stuff said about the them. The language gets dense sometimes but every item includes an example that should be clear to anyone.

(in reply to subrosaDom)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 9:02:22 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Having observed politics up close and personal for most of my adult lifetime, I have come to the conclusion that the rise of politicized religious fundamentalism may have been the key ingredient in the transformation of the Republican Party. Politicized religion provides a substrate of beliefs that rationalizes—at least in the minds of its followers—all three of the GOP’s main tenets: wealth worship, war worship, and the permanent culture war.

--

The religious right’s professed insistence upon “family values” might appear at first blush to be at odds with the anything but saintly personal behavior of many of its leading proponents. Some of this may be due to the general inability of human beings to reflect on conflicting information: I have never ceased to be amazed at how facts manage to bounce off people’s consciousness like pebbles off armor plate.


http://www.salon.com/2012/08/05/republicans_slouching_toward_theocracy/

Kind of a fun read....

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 9/6/2014 9:04:00 PM >

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 9:41:01 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

the GOP’s main tenets: wealth worship, war worship, and the permanent culture war

http://www.salon.com/2012/08/05/republicans_slouching_toward_theocracy/

Well that's that then. If you read it in Salon, it must be true.

Move along folks, nothing more to see here.

K.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Gop trying to break science education again - 9/6/2014 9:46:54 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Having observed politics up close and personal for most of my adult lifetime, I have come to the conclusion that the rise of politicized religious fundamentalism may have been the key ingredient in the transformation of the Republican Party. Politicized religion provides a substrate of beliefs that rationalizes—at least in the minds of its followers—all three of the GOP’s main tenets: wealth worship, war worship, and the permanent culture war.

--

The religious right’s professed insistence upon “family values” might appear at first blush to be at odds with the anything but saintly personal behavior of many of its leading proponents. Some of this may be due to the general inability of human beings to reflect on conflicting information: I have never ceased to be amazed at how facts manage to bounce off people’s consciousness like pebbles off armor plate.


http://www.salon.com/2012/08/05/republicans_slouching_toward_theocracy/

Kind of a fun read....
Tell me, cloudboy...just out of my own insatiable curiosity...does that have to do with this thread?

Biggggg surprise...somehow, someone managed to find a GOP deserter who saw the light about how NOTHING is RIGHT about the right. In fact, it is jussssst how the left (including websites like Salon) says it is. How absolutely astounding their gift of prescience must be....right before an election.



(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gop trying to break science education again Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109