FieryOpal
Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013 From: Maryland Status: offline
|
This is where people get into misunderstandings, by making unsubstantiated presumptions, myself included. Having said that, it was your implied (whether you meant it this way and if not, then my inferred) caveat "as long as social contact does not put anyone at risk." In my opinion, waiting until then isn't acceptable; others not named FieryOpal can do as they please. I am not one to hurriedly meet-screen prospective candidates in person. On average, I spend at least two to three weeks minimum exchanging messages with a male sub, assuming that we have the option to meet sooner and that two weeks wasn't the soonest available date. I am a sapiosexual and I must establish a mental connection first, and without that intellectually stimulating verbal (written, linguistic) rapport, nothing is going to get off the ground with me regardless. Others may do things differently and not want to invest as much time on line before meeting somebody. You speak of empathy and I have tons of it, but you know what? I don't owe anybody a pity fuck, much less an equal opportunity fuck. (Not that that is what a mere first introductory meeting would lead to! But I do CFNM-Clothed Female Naked Male inspections usually right after having determined that we have sexual chemistry.) I would prefer that before I start wasting my time fantasizing about or getting attached to a person, that for both of our sakes, it would be better to nip things in the bud in advance. That's all. Why prolong unfruitful endeavors unnecessarily? I for one have to streamline my personal affairs, and it's highly unfair to lead another person on out of insecurity and fear of rejection. As for the gentlemen in question, we had already discussed the full scope of embarking upon an intimate relationship, including BDSM compatibility and limits, and they either chose to sidestep the issue or make off-the-wall assumptions about Dommes' preferring artificial intercourse (with a dildo or vibrator perhaps) to natural intercourse or that they could get by with performing oral worship. I make exclusive commitments in my FLRs and do not keep a stable of multiple subs as one-trick ponies. This was also blatantly clear. Not only that, I was very specific about how T&D with me required feedback in the form of erection responses. Perhaps this has never been your experience, but there are people who lead others on in the hopes that once they've gotten their foot in the door, certain requirements will be overlooked (age, misleadingly old photos, height, weight or physical fitness level, marital status, location, actual availability and accessibility, etc.). Would it be fair for someone with PTSD or who is prone to having panic attacks to not disclose this in a timely manner either? Your definition of timely and mine may vary, but it's hardly worth quibbling over in the context of this discussion. I hope this didn't sound defensive, but I detected a defensive reaction on your part which I feel was uncalled for.
_____________________________
Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau
|