Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Canadian gun control...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Canadian gun control... Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/26/2014 10:16:12 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.

Well if that is true then you should have no problems linking a post where she suggested the answer is to flood the streets with guns. Otherwise we are going to have to assume you are just talking out of your ass again.

Unlike you, I am bright enough to know what the fuck I am talking about.
Do you really think arming everyone in the UK wouldnt be flooding the streets with guns, because Aylee suggested the Rotherham case would be different if everyone had access to firearms. I know you are just trolling like usual, like you normally fucking do, but I felt the need to ask all the same.


Where did anyone say that everyone in the UK should be armed? Suggesting everyone have access to arms doesn't mean everyone is going to be armed. We aren't all armed in the US, are we? Yet, our access isn't amazingly limited at all. What makes you think allowing UK Citizens who want firearms to be allowed to have firearms means that all UK Citizens will be armed, and that guns will flood the streets (I haven't seen a gun being carried on the street by anyone but a LEO, though I do know there have been at least some concealed carrying).


I think we have a terminology problem. To many from the UK allowing concealed carry is "flooding the streets" To most from the US that means everyone on the street is open carry, likely waving their guns around, like Hamas.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/26/2014 2:44:36 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.

Well if that is true then you should have no problems linking a post where she suggested the answer is to flood the streets with guns. Otherwise we are going to have to assume you are just talking out of your ass again.

Unlike you, I am bright enough to know what the fuck I am talking about.
Do you really think arming everyone in the UK wouldnt be flooding the streets with guns, because Aylee suggested the Rotherham case would be different if everyone had access to firearms. I know you are just trolling like usual, like you normally fucking do, but I felt the need to ask all the same.

Where did anyone say that everyone in the UK should be armed? Suggesting everyone have access to arms doesn't mean everyone is going to be armed. We aren't all armed in the US, are we? Yet, our access isn't amazingly limited at all. What makes you think allowing UK Citizens who want firearms to be allowed to have firearms means that all UK Citizens will be armed, and that guns will flood the streets (I haven't seen a gun being carried on the street by anyone but a LEO, though I do know there have been at least some concealed carrying).

I think we have a terminology problem. To many from the UK allowing concealed carry is "flooding the streets" To most from the US that means everyone on the street is open carry, likely waving their guns around, like Hamas.


To me, "flooding the streets" means that the streets are full of people with guns. There are enough dumbasses that if the streets were "flooded" with guns, there'd be enough open-carry people that they'd have been seen. That's not even requiring them to be "brandishing" their weapons, either (though there'd likely be some of those morons, too).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/26/2014 5:23:29 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


I think we have a terminology problem. To many from the UK allowing concealed carry is "flooding the streets" To most from the US that means everyone on the street is open carry, likely waving their guns around, like Hamas.


No Bama, you have a stupidity problem, just like the others who cant follow plain English.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/26/2014 5:32:10 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

laughable that you moan about insults, given your posting history.

Well in all fairness, she's never called you a "stupid cow."

K.







For once we agree, although as far as know, I havent called her dopey bollocks either.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/26/2014 5:34:07 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

laughable that you moan about insults, given your posting history.

Well in all fairness, she's never called you a "stupid cow."

K.








No I didn't. And I notice with all his huffing and puffing he still hasn't given us a link to back up his bullshit statement.


I explained it to you twice, is it that difficult for you to grasp ?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 7:17:50 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.

Well if that is true then you should have no problems linking a post where she suggested the answer is to flood the streets with guns. Otherwise we are going to have to assume you are just talking out of your ass again.

Unlike you, I am bright enough to know what the fuck I am talking about.
Do you really think arming everyone in the UK wouldnt be flooding the streets with guns, because Aylee suggested the Rotherham case would be different if everyone had access to firearms. I know you are just trolling like usual, like you normally fucking do, but I felt the need to ask all the same.


Where did anyone say that everyone in the UK should be armed? Suggesting everyone have access to arms doesn't mean everyone is going to be armed. We aren't all armed in the US, are we? Yet, our access isn't amazingly limited at all. What makes you think allowing UK Citizens who want firearms to be allowed to have firearms means that all UK Citizens will be armed, and that guns will flood the streets (I haven't seen a gun being carried on the street by anyone but a LEO, though I do know there have been at least some concealed carrying).



According to PS Aylee has continually said it but when I asked for a link he called me a stupid cow. Perhaps you will have better luck but I am not holding my breath.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 7:21:37 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

laughable that you moan about insults, given your posting history.

Well in all fairness, she's never called you a "stupid cow."

K.








No I didn't. And I notice with all his huffing and puffing he still hasn't given us a link to back up his bullshit statement.


I explained it to you twice, is it that difficult for you to grasp ?




Not at all. You claimed she said something she never said and now you are backpedaling like crazy trying to make us think you meant something totally different.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 4:11:49 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Well you wouldnt see it that way, would you Aylee. Some of us put saving lives first.

Read the figures to see if gun laws work or not. You will note that ownership isnt banned outright, just some sensible laws put in place.

http://www.businessinsider.com/canada-australia-japan-britain-gun-control-2013-1


Ah yes. The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled by her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.

Can you imagine the difference it could of made if the mother's and father's or even the girls themselves in Rotherham had had access to firearm?

Oh wait. That might actually take a life. Rape is just a property crime, after all.


Now you are trying to put words in my mouth. I never mentioned rape, not once. The only theory I have is that yet again you are talking shit. As for mentioning Rotherham, thats some fucking lowpoint, even for you. Let me point something out though, any father could have killed his daughters abuser, any woman with a knife could have defended herself. You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.



You are the one that would prefer to save the attacker's life as opposed to saving the person from being attacked.

And a woman with a knife could have defended herself? Sure, maybe on Xena:Warrior Princess. But no, 99% of women do not have the upper body strength or the reach. Especially in the Rotherham situation where there was gang raping and the parents as well as the girls were being threatened. But hey! Good news! The attackers are perfectly fine.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 5:05:19 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:


Not at all. You claimed she said something she never said and now you are backpedaling like crazy trying to make us think you meant something totally different.


You could call it 'hoist by your own petard', THB. I've often noticed you making 'you seem to ....' sorts of statements to posters (including me, frequently) that are just crap. You don't bother to cite the posts that brought you to your conclusion about a given poster's position - you just state how this or that poster has come across to you - as though your own prejudices and misapprehensions - no matter how disputed they are by the relevant posters - are, nonetheless, 'the truth'. If you're going to give it, you must expect to take it, too.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 5:41:55 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Not at all. You claimed she said something she never said and now you are backpedaling like crazy trying to make us think you meant something totally different.


Good grief, are you really so dense as not to understand simple English ?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 5:47:18 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You are the one that would prefer to save the attacker's life as opposed to saving the person from being attacked.

And a woman with a knife could have defended herself? Sure, maybe on Xena:Warrior Princess. But no, 99% of women do not have the upper body strength or the reach. Especially in the Rotherham situation where there was gang raping and the parents as well as the girls were being threatened. But hey! Good news! The attackers are perfectly fine.


Two things I know for certain Aylee ;
1) You wont find any post of mine where I have said the attackers life should be saved, so put up or shut up.
2) THB is clearly going to jump right in and demand you post where I have actually said any such thing << Like fuck will she.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 6:33:45 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.




Well if that is true then you should have no problems linking a post where she suggested the answer is to flood the streets with guns. Otherwise we are going to have to assume you are just talking out of your ass again.


Unlike you, I am bright enough to know what the fuck I am talking about.

Do you really think arming everyone in the UK wouldnt be flooding the streets with guns, because Aylee suggested the Rotherham case would be different if everyone had access to firearms. I know you are just trolling like usual, like you normally fucking do, but I felt the need to ask all the same.


I find this quite amusing, you say arming everyone in UK would be flooding the street with guns, but I didn't see her or anyone say anything arming everyone in the UK with guns

she and many others HAVE said they should have access, from that you jump to the conclusion that if they had access they'd ALL run right out and get guns, and the street would be FLOODED. but in the post that started this you proclaim "some of us are more enlightened"

seems you feel your countrymen are less enlightened than people of the USA, since we all have access to guns but our streets are NOT flooded with guns, but if you people had that same access it would flood the street with guns

you can't have it BOTH WAYS DUDE

you can not proclaim people in the UK are MORE ENLIGHTENED, then turn around and say if they had the SAME RIGHTS people in the USA have they'd act like SAVAGES

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 10/27/2014 6:36:43 PM >

_____________________________

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." - Albert Einstein

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 7:01:05 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You continually suggest the only solution is to flood the streets with guns, some of us are more enlightened.




Well if that is true then you should have no problems linking a post where she suggested the answer is to flood the streets with guns. Otherwise we are going to have to assume you are just talking out of your ass again.


Unlike you, I am bright enough to know what the fuck I am talking about.

Do you really think arming everyone in the UK wouldnt be flooding the streets with guns, because Aylee suggested the Rotherham case would be different if everyone had access to firearms. I know you are just trolling like usual, like you normally fucking do, but I felt the need to ask all the same.


I find this quite amusing, you say arming everyone in UK would be flooding the street with guns, but I didn't see her or anyone say anything arming everyone in the UK with guns

she and many others HAVE said they should have access, from that you jump to the conclusion that if they had access they'd ALL run right out and get guns, and the street would be FLOODED. but in the post that started this you proclaim "some of us are more enlightened"

seems you feel your countrymen are less enlightened than people of the USA, since we all have access to guns but our streets are NOT flooded with guns, but if you people had that same access it would flood the street with guns

you can't have it BOTH WAYS DUDE

you can not proclaim people in the UK are MORE ENLIGHTENED, then turn around and say if they had the SAME RIGHTS people in the USA have they'd act like SAVAGES

It is possible that he thinks we act like savages.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 7:26:55 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You are the one that would prefer to save the attacker's life as opposed to saving the person from being attacked.

And a woman with a knife could have defended herself? Sure, maybe on Xena:Warrior Princess. But no, 99% of women do not have the upper body strength or the reach. Especially in the Rotherham situation where there was gang raping and the parents as well as the girls were being threatened. But hey! Good news! The attackers are perfectly fine.


Two things I know for certain Aylee ;
1) You wont find any post of mine where I have said the attackers life should be saved, so put up or shut up.
2) THB is clearly going to jump right in and demand you post where I have actually said any such thing << Like fuck will she.




Sure I will, right after you show me where she said flooding the streets with guns is a good idea.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/27/2014 8:31:30 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

You are the one that would prefer to save the attacker's life as opposed to saving the person from being attacked.

And a woman with a knife could have defended herself? Sure, maybe on Xena:Warrior Princess. But no, 99% of women do not have the upper body strength or the reach. Especially in the Rotherham situation where there was gang raping and the parents as well as the girls were being threatened. But hey! Good news! The attackers are perfectly fine.


Two things I know for certain Aylee ;
1) You wont find any post of mine where I have said the attackers life should be saved, so put up or shut up.
2) THB is clearly going to jump right in and demand you post where I have actually said any such thing << Like fuck will she.



http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4743447

Post 145.

quote:

Some of us put saving lives first.


_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/28/2014 9:59:30 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		I see nothing their that says.specifically,saving the attackers lives...certainly nothing that suggests doing so in preference to the "victim".
I'm calling bullshit on that

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/28/2014 10:16:48 AM   
stanleyt6969yho


Posts: 7
Joined: 7/27/2013
Status: offline 		The best violence control is that everyone carry a gun. Sounds really silly but what criminal would rob a store or rob a bank or try to victimize someone if they knew the other person had a gun. Our 2nd Amend calls for citizens to be able to protect themselves and is why it is in the US constitution and I think most don't carry but sure have a way to defend themselves at home and protect themselves and their families. The only protection from bad guys with guns is a good guy with a gun.
Australia has taken 40 million guns away from law abiding citizens(which is what our president acclaims) and the crime rate went up 2000% in Australia. If guns are not allowed only bad guys will have guns. Never ever hear our liberal media talk about crimes that have been stopped by good guys with guns but it happens everyday. Navy yard shoots in US killed 12 Navy workers and would have killed many more but a good guy with a gun stopped him but try to find that in today's liberal media as it doesn't play into what the administration wants.
We won't have any guns in the hands of law abiding citizens here in the US in 100 years and like boiling a frog it will come a little bit at a time until the only people left with guns are criminals. It is not an issue of liberals of conservative it is an issue of common sense. Accidental shoots in this country are few and far between. If gun control works why are the two areas of the country with the hardest laws the highest in crime in the USA? Laws can never change the heart motives of an individual so why do we think gun laws will change anything to the good as only the good guys will be affected and not the bad guys.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/28/2014 10:29:37 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline 		Welcome to the forums, Stanley, and thank you for your contribution.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to stanleyt6969yho)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/28/2014 10:37:47 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Yeah,welcome to the forums....as if we didn't have enough putzs submitting posts wherein they make outlandish statements with absolutely no citations( and the crime rate went up 2000% in Australia.)

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Canadian gun control... - 10/28/2014 12:37:28 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stanleyt6969yho

Australia has taken 40 million guns away from law abiding citizens(which is what our president acclaims) and the crime rate went up 2000% in Australia.


I have been on this site for a long time and we have had many gun discussions. If the above were true, I am pretty sure I would remember seeing links to that figure by now. But hey, I have been wrong before. Maybe you have a link handy to throw out there. In either case welcome to the dungeon.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to stanleyt6969yho)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Canadian gun control... Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109