Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/12/2014 5:22:50 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
This is pretty simple with net neutrality innovation rules and the next small company can get its start without needing to find the money to buy a huge chunk of bandwidth. Without NN innovation dies. There won't be the next Twitter or Skype or Google or pretty much any other internet company no one thought of before.

< Message edited by DomKen -- 11/12/2014 5:23:12 PM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/12/2014 5:35:26 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Straw man much?


Oh the fucking irony....


He's Irony Man.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/12/2014 5:55:48 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

This is pretty simple with net neutrality innovation rules and the next small company can get its start without needing to find the money to buy a huge chunk of bandwidth. Without NN innovation dies. There won't be the next Twitter or Skype or Google or pretty much any other internet company no one thought of before.



Yea, I would have to agree with this.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/12/2014 6:27:54 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Straw man much?


Oh the fucking irony....


He's Irony Man.


The one who all the trolls are talking about... ;?)


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/13/2014 3:45:15 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
These posts get to the muck because that's all anybody cares about. Trying to tell you, this is America so it's not about the Inter-fucking-net...it's about fucking M O N E Y !! [It] IS always...about money.

The capitalist is thinking, having little or no competition thanx to very favorable merging over the years, now having the market power to fuck with the big 3 orig. broadcasters that govt. has allowed me SO.....

.....IF [I] can fuck with spectrum, if I can find a way to MAKE more MONEY via a two tiered or 3 or 4 tiered spectrum over the fucking Inter-fucking-net...then I fucking WILL. Netflix already caved and like a cheap suit.

Google, Yahoo, FaceFuck...er Book, Titter...er Twits. Whatever. Ahhh....the mother-load !! As Carl Sagan would say...we're talking BILL...Yins and BILL...Yins of dollars.

This should prove easy to buy from govt., all is going just as we've paid for and planned and should be yet another huge profit center.

End of argument as there is...NO argument, IT IS about the fucking Money !!

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/13/2014 6:01:02 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Straw man much?


Oh the fucking irony....



You mean, the irony of you calling yourself "polite" right?

Or you claiming any link to "sanity" ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/14/2014 9:18:10 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
The cable companies would like to be able to charge extra rates for premium service.


Where do they not already do that? Inquiring minds want to know!

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
Even so, it lets startups like google eventually become google.


You say that like it's a good thing.

quote:

It lets "the people" converse with each other rather than letting billionaires talk at us.


Yeah, like google or twitterbutt or face-ass billionaires not doing anything with all this 'converstion' and 'searching' and 'ordering' and everything else but completely standing aside and looking politely away, which is how they became billionaires in the first place, as the vox populi ... 'converse'. ...

Just too funny.



< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/14/2014 9:47:29 PM >

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/14/2014 10:45:33 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
The cable companies would like to be able to charge extra rates for premium service.


Where do they not already do that? Inquiring minds want to know!

Right now actually. All content is delivered to you at the same speed, or at least it is supposed to be.

The discussion isn't whether or not you can pay for more or less bandwidth but whether the ISP's can speed up or slow down your access to specific content based on whether those providers have paid them.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 1:04:34 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

My cable company charges from low to high based on both MPS speed and total download limit in Mbytes.

Economy Plus Internet $19.99 per month for 12 mo.
Download speeds up to 3 Mbps
Add to Cart

Internet Plus
$39.99 per month for 12 mo.
25 Mbps TV local channels HBO GO® included
Add to Cart

Internet Plus with Blast!®
$49.99 per month for 12 mo.
Download speeds up to 50 Mbps
TV local channels HBO GO® included
Add to Cart

Elsewhere on the Comcast site:

3 Mbps 19.99/Mo., 6 Mbps 49.95/Mo., 25 Mbps 29.99/Mo., 105 Mbsp 89.99/Mo.

All the above for the first 12 months. The price essentially doubles after two years for most offers.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 1:10:37 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
Not that I have any sympathy towards the cable companies at all, but they are just looking to get a scoop of all that provider ad revenue, something that we as individual users are powerless to do.

Now my battery has run out.

Later.


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 2:22:06 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

I'm not saying that the FCC's classification of cable companies as "information providers" rather than "telecommunications providers" isn't complete bunkum.

What I am saying is that people who were asleep at the wheel when this very same compunction for the regulators to avoid regulating has been going on since 1981, and if 'net neutrality' people completely overlooked what has gone on in the FTC (especially that) and the FDA and the SEC and the CFTC and the USAD, etc. then don't expect others who went back to sleep waiting for anyone else to notice to get as exited over the issue as you expect.

This is nothing more than good old-fashioned economic "rent seeking," and it's been going on long before the net techies decided to wake up and get a clue.

Google, Face Butt, etc. make hundreds of millions off of almost anything we do on the internet, and none of it comes back to us.

MY vote would be that the FCC -require- that the properly termed "telecommunication providers" tack on a hefty surcharge to the "Ad Revenue Collectors" (AKA "information providers") and then -require- them to reduce our cable or satellite monthly bill accordingly.

Likewise a similar reduction of our credit card charges by a "consumer's-taxing" of the credit score companies who make millions off our purchasing and payment history, etc.






< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/15/2014 2:26:17 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 4:10:44 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
But the problem is that all the text-driving and cell-phone-talking-when they're-supposed-to-be-ordering-while-at-the head-of-the-line at the restaurant or coffee shop and twittering-apping and music-and-movie-stealing pizza-eating blasting-earbud GAMERS dropped a pepperoni from mouth to lap, having -just now- somehow caught on to this net neutrality thing as being some potential threat to all the above, ... so then all the world is now to take notice of their concerns.

Good luck with that.

"Regulation" in all forms and venues has been renegade, under essentially rogue governments, for decades already. If you had fucking shut up with the texting and bumping into people in public while yacking nonsense and drivel on the cell phone and otherwise ignoring the rest of the real world while you were killing millions of people in your stupid games, then you might have noticed sometime beforehand.




< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/15/2014 4:48:13 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 6:24:30 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


My cable company charges from low to high based on both MPS speed and total download limit in Mbytes.


You don't understand the issue. The ISP can certainly sell you a certain bandwidth. What net neutrality is about is whether they can throttle certain content coming over their network to you.

Say Microsoft pays Comcast more than Google so now Bing simply comes up way faster.

The big problem with that is that it could very well freeze out the next big thing as it would never get the bandwidth needed to get noticed.

< Message edited by DomKen -- 11/15/2014 6:25:00 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 6:54:31 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

I understand completely. But why is the silence on gouging customers now become all this crowd of the incensed over charging another business likewise? That tells me something about how people have been steered completely awry.

I'm just saying that those who just now figured out that the regulators have been favoring the regulated for 30+ years already are quite late to the party, and not in any 'fashionable' sense whatsoever.

I am also saying that I would not nominate either the Gooble or FaceButt add-tracker businesses for the "Useful Innovation to Society Hall of Fame." And their lawyers are every bit as good as the cable/satellite companies' lawyers, which is all that matters or has ever mattered.

The guy who invented the Shark-Bite plumbing fittings is a hero to society, or this woman and her affordable medical testing devices. These are the true innovators, not the the Gamers and Add-Revenue-trackers.

If you want to fight for a cause, make it a useful cause. Gooble and FaceButt ain't all that, nowhere close.





< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/15/2014 7:46:55 AM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 7:31:21 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


I understand completely. But why is the silence on gouging customers now become all this crowd of the incensed over charging another business likewise? That tells me something about how people have been steered completely awry.

There are issues at the consumer end as well but that is not the topic at hand.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 7:50:49 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


I understand completely. But why is the silence on gouging customers now become all this crowd of the incensed over charging another business likewise? That tells me something about how people have been steered completely awry.

There are issues at the consumer end as well but that is not the topic at hand.




The thing is, internet is title I while it rolled out and developed so it had a light regulatory touch, we can easily see what happens if it is allowed to stay there, it will become like (and is becoming like) the cable industry, monopoly and price gouging and lack of innovation.

We would like to avoid that, I think.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 8:34:40 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

OK, I'm game, if anyone can explain just what is at stake for the end-user, and how.

I don't do offline or online or cloud gaming, and I have to fix my dad's and his new wife's computers and email and online situations at least once every two months now because the stupid browsers (any of them) just can't stop shitting their pants enough to stop their incessant new-and-something-else-to figure-out version every chance they get, etc.

Yes, I would like to avoid any move towards monopoly, but I'm not seeing where the existing tacit collusion towards ever greater annoyance isn't already too far there. Email, browser, website, all of them hire pizza-munching gamers to design new trip bars for the unfortunate seekers of simple utility.

I once had to make a return on one item of an ebay purchase, and the fuckwit just 'refunded' the amount in question to my non-existent paypal 'account', because that's how ebay directs their sellers to do things. Took me $7.00+ in on-hold minutes to straighten it out with paypal.

What frikken forced monopoly doesn't already exist? Is any new putatively positive net neutrality initiative going to deal with things like that?

I'll take peoples' word for it that things could get even worse, but I would hope that this 'new awakening' might stretch further to fix what is already not working very well as it is.








< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/15/2014 9:02:37 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 8:50:00 AM   
ThatDaveGuy69


Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Edwynn: If you're referring to why net neutrality matters and what is at stake for the end-user, the Netfilx case should make that very clear.
Without solid rules in place that guarantee that all data be treated equally you - the end-user - will end up paying more for the services you want. If Netflix charges $10/month but now has to pay money to Comcast to not slow their service, Netflix will pass that price along to you. So instead of $10 maybe Netflix has to charge $12. In the meantime, Comcast starts up their own online movie service for $10 per month. It's a clear case of unfair competition.

Comcast (or any other ISP) could just as easily charge other providers for "premium" service. How about they slow down Google, Yahoo, and any other large mail provider? You would then be more likely to use Comcast mail. All of the ISP's have to ability to throttle traffic to/from any service they want. Net Neutrality - at its heart - is meant to stop that.


_____________________________

He said I'd blown a seal. I said fix the damn thing and leave my private life out of this!
What happens in the event horizon STAYS in the Event Horizon!
I have zero tolerance for Zero Tolerance

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 9:13:32 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

All good and well, but this is dealing with the horses that have long bolted out the barn door.

The way to truly fix the situation is to allow competing cable companies in any local market, rather than the monopoly awarded in almost all localities, as is the situation now.

The AT&T did the same thing you are talking about in charging higher rates to MCI, Sprint, et al., back in the day, and that's when the government broke up the Bell monopoly.

The net neutrality people are arguing that some monopoly might happen, when it in fact already exists in most every municipality.



< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/15/2014 9:27:36 AM >

(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/15/2014 9:16:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
banging my head


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078