Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/19/2014 7:56:17 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

The Congressional Report on the Great Recession fingered the Federal Reserve for not catching it and stopping it. Imagine that. An agency that is supposed to prevent that stuff, didn't.

Of course the Congressional Report did -- because they otherwise would have to accept responsibility.

The Fed Chairman warned in 2001 that the Bush Tax cuts were "reckless and irresponsible" -- and then Bush added two wars. However, Congress did NOTHING to address the fiscal shortfalls, insisting that magic money would flow in and create growth that would bring in the revenue to cover the excesses. Instead -- the deficit and the national debt ballooned again.

So the Fed addressed this with monetary policy, effectively buying us out of two recessions by continually making money cheaper. Still, Congress never addressed fiscal policy. So, when interest rates were near zero, that band-aid was gone -- the Fed at that point has only more drastic tools (changing bank reserve requirements, for example) which would be worse than the recession. Hence -- the 2008 recession. Add to that the SEC mortgage bundling derivative fiasco, making effective financial health analysis impossible, and suddenly money and credit and trust dry up, just when the cost of hanging on to cash is very low.

What did Congress do then? Address the structural deficit?

Naw...doubled down and stupidity, and issued a Report.

Without the Fed's actions, the 2008 recession would have happened in 2003.




(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/20/2014 7:58:46 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The Congressional Report on the Great Recession fingered the Federal Reserve for not catching it and stopping it. Imagine that. An agency that is supposed to prevent that stuff, didn't.

Of course the Congressional Report did -- because they otherwise would have to accept responsibility.
The Fed Chairman warned in 2001 that the Bush Tax cuts were "reckless and irresponsible" -- and then Bush added two wars. However, Congress did NOTHING to address the fiscal shortfalls, insisting that magic money would flow in and create growth that would bring in the revenue to cover the excesses. Instead -- the deficit and the national debt ballooned again.
So the Fed addressed this with monetary policy, effectively buying us out of two recessions by continually making money cheaper. Still, Congress never addressed fiscal policy. So, when interest rates were near zero, that band-aid was gone -- the Fed at that point has only more drastic tools (changing bank reserve requirements, for example) which would be worse than the recession. Hence -- the 2008 recession. Add to that the SEC mortgage bundling derivative fiasco, making effective financial health analysis impossible, and suddenly money and credit and trust dry up, just when the cost of hanging on to cash is very low.
What did Congress do then? Address the structural deficit?
Naw...doubled down and stupidity, and issued a Report.
Without the Fed's actions, the 2008 recession would have happened in 2003.


Um, did tax revenues rise? They most certainly did. And, they continued to rise, reaching historic levels under Obama (who didn't cancel any of the Bush tax cuts for 4 years).

Did spending rise? It most certainly did.

So, the GOP's claim that revenues would increase was... wait for it... correct. That they increased spending is definitely on the GOP's shoulders. I don't pretend otherwise.

I've said for quite some time now, that the Federal Reserve's near zero interest rate on money has caused quite a bit of damage and has made the situation worse, including helping fuel bubbles.






_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/20/2014 8:05:57 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
gas is $1.05 a litre here, down from $1.50 two months ago
jus sayin


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Ne... - 11/20/2014 10:34:04 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The Congressional Report on the Great Recession fingered the Federal Reserve for not catching it and stopping it. Imagine that. An agency that is supposed to prevent that stuff, didn't.

Of course the Congressional Report did -- because they otherwise would have to accept responsibility.
The Fed Chairman warned in 2001 that the Bush Tax cuts were "reckless and irresponsible" -- and then Bush added two wars. However, Congress did NOTHING to address the fiscal shortfalls, insisting that magic money would flow in and create growth that would bring in the revenue to cover the excesses. Instead -- the deficit and the national debt ballooned again.
So the Fed addressed this with monetary policy, effectively buying us out of two recessions by continually making money cheaper. Still, Congress never addressed fiscal policy. So, when interest rates were near zero, that band-aid was gone -- the Fed at that point has only more drastic tools (changing bank reserve requirements, for example) which would be worse than the recession. Hence -- the 2008 recession. Add to that the SEC mortgage bundling derivative fiasco, making effective financial health analysis impossible, and suddenly money and credit and trust dry up, just when the cost of hanging on to cash is very low.
What did Congress do then? Address the structural deficit?
Naw...doubled down and stupidity, and issued a Report.
Without the Fed's actions, the 2008 recession would have happened in 2003.


Um, did tax revenues rise? They most certainly did. And, they continued to rise, reaching historic levels under Obama (who didn't cancel any of the Bush tax cuts for 4 years).

Did spending rise? It most certainly did.

So, the GOP's claim that revenues would increase was... wait for it... correct. That they increased spending is definitely on the GOP's shoulders. I don't pretend otherwise.

I've said for quite some time now, that the Federal Reserve's near zero interest rate on money has caused quite a bit of damage and has made the situation worse, including helping fuel bubbles.








Wait for it!!!! Incorrect. The revenues rose after the tax cuts expired and banks paid fines for their pickpocketing the country in terms of mortgage meltdown. Nothing to do with nutsuckers.


the zero interest has fueled no bubbles. what it has done is allowed (because of nutsuckers inaction) companies to buy back stock at rockbottom prices, and move overseas.

Hasnt helped the common guy, we dont get those loans.


Saying that the republicans were right on this raising revenue was due to their nutsuckerisms, is much like saying Smoot-Hawley was responsible for the great depression.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 11/20/2014 10:35:53 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 84
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama Urges F.C.C. to Adopt Rules to Protect Net Neutrality Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063