DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: truckinslave Your post assumes that all possible executive actions (on immigration) are equal, or at least equally legal. Which is, of course, asinine. I'd love to hear how what the President proposes tonight is less legal than what Reagan or either Bush did by executive order. Precisely in detail. What EO did Bush 41 sign about immigration? Did you not read my earlier post that showed that Reagan, Bush 43, AND Clinton, all wrote EO's that were specifically mentioned as being allowed, in US Code? Unless Obama is going to follow suit and award qualification to undocumented immigrants who have fought in some military conflict that hasn't yet been mentioned in an EO, his actions won't be the same as Reagan, Bush 43, and Clinton. Obviously, we'll have to wait and see what the President is considering, but when you compare legality of two actions, those actions should be similar in more than just a broad category, like "immigration-related." Those are not the only EO's on immigration issued by Reagan and the Bush's. Do better research.
|