BamaD -> RE: Why is the Right afraid of Sharia Law? (1/18/2015 8:54:11 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 Oh the ignorance of the old. There's this thing called google, but I think it's a bit beyond your years [8|] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anxiety Definition: noun, plural anxieties. 1. distress or uneasiness of mind caused by fear of danger or misfortune: He felt anxiety about the possible loss of his job. 2. earnest but tense desire; eagerness: He had a keen anxiety to succeed in his work. 3. Psychiatry. a state of apprehension and psychic tension occurring in some forms of mental disorder. Synonyms Expand 1. fear, foreboding; worry, disquiet. See apprehension. anxiety in Science Expand anxiety (āng-zī'ĭ-tē) A state of apprehension and fear resulting from the anticipation of a threatening event or situation. ◇ In psychiatry, a patient has an anxiety disorder ◇ if normal psychological functioning is disrupted or if anxiety persists without an identifiable cause. anxiety in Culture Expand anxiety definition Emotional distress, especially that brought on by fear of failure. ( See also angst.) Thank you for proving my point, conservatives fall under definition two. Knew I could count on you. And yet the science disagrees with you, if you even bothered to read the research. Nice try [:D] I edited in a few more of the definitions in regards to certain things above, such as culture, science, etc. The use of anxiety in science, as seen above and in the link, is the way it was used in the scientific article originally posted by kirata. You can argue semantics all you want, but reality doesn't change for you, no mater how much you can try to deny it. Here's it again in case you missed it: anxiety in Science Expand anxiety (āng-zī'ĭ-tē) A state of apprehension and fear resulting from the anticipation of a threatening event or situation. ◇ In psychiatry, a patient has an anxiety disorder ◇ if normal psychological functioning is disrupted or if anxiety persists without an identifiable cause. Don't try arguing with a science major pal, you're just asking to get pounded. I'm no pro but I can easily stand my own against those less versed in science than I am. As pointed out before even the Klan produces "scientific studies" that prove they are right. Don't argue the Constitution with a history major buddy, you've already lost and you don't even know it. Lol, history huh? Then historically speaking you'd understand how the rise of peer-reviewing has vastly advanced the merits of science across the world, correct? This paper is peer reviewed, the article made was by scientific american and the paper was released by the much acclaimed Journal Behavioural and Brain Sciences. Not that it matters much to you, you care more about what makes you right than what the truth actually is. Ignorance is bliss as they say. Your attempt to discredit peer reviewed science by claiming your "history major" is superior in merit is laughable. Not to mention that by comparing myself and the rest of the scientific community to the Klan, I guess you should point the finger at Kirata too right? I mean, he posted the original article trying to prove libs as being immoral and cons as not being fearful, so you can't exactly blame me for pulling out a piece of crap and slapping it down on the table, can you? Because it was already there, but you guys just looked at it thinking it was gold, not really realizing what was really inside [:D] Also wtf does the constitution have to do with cons being fearful in nature? Cons aren't native to the US, I mean, your brand of crazy cons are pretty unique but we got our own cons up here in canada and you got your cousins flying the ISIS banner, so you can hardly say you're original [;)] You have lost track of the subject of the thread. It is about why conservatives oppose sharia law. Quite simply it is because it is unconstitutional. I never said my degree in history makes me stronger in science than someone currently taking classes in science. Once again you respond to what you wish I had said rather than what I did say. Bigotry such as yours does that to your thinking.
|
|
|
|