Edwird -> RE: Progressive Education (5/6/2016 3:46:13 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwird Oh, and by the way ... China is not sending their best and brightest to US universities by the cargo ship load for purpose of further installation of 'leftist ideals,' unfathomable as that may be to a person of your mindset. Nope, it's because the US university system is 100% focused on how to turn basic knowledge (especially 'high tech') into cash, as soon as possible. But at the same time, increasing the distance between us by way of 'expressing your view,' "what do you think?" All the while foisting upon the student the overtly logical disconnect between your own view and that of another completely in apposition having equal validity, so that you can go against your own principles when you get into the work place, the mark of a "team player." The US uni promotes 'basic knowledge' as a way to increase advertising revenue by way of social engineering, starting right there in the classroom. The Chinese just steal all this basic knowledge for purpose of things like genetic research, materials science, computer and robotic science, etc. No doubt, China, overall, is still 50 years behind the US at the moment, but when they eventually attain with 10% of their population having the knowledge of physics, genetics, etc. for purpose of producing something actually useful to a society, as opposed to the 100% US intention of furthering the cause of social media, hyper-target advertising, and 'high' (as a kite) finance, ... Look out, folks. It's coming, even as we bite our nails about the 'politics' that might be involved. What, they're fifty years behind the times because they still have manufacturing industries that bring revenue into their country, rather than pumping it out? [:D] Not saying that at all. And I'm not going to tell you or anyone else that just because I got a good grade on my somewhat lengthy "Chinese Domestic Economy" paper for one of my classes at the uni makes me an 'expert' on the matter. Far from it. I also get some info about their society from these 'Chinese detective agency' fiction books I like, even though, by these authors' accounts, a private detective agency is actually outlawed in China. And there is also CRI- Chinese Radio International, whose 'Biz Report' program (on local AM radio!) far exceeds anything I've heard on US or European radio (though Deutcshe Welle, on the internet, ain't half bad either). In any case, I was actually being generous in saying they were 50 years behind, when 150 years behind would be closer to the truth. What I mean by that is the working hours (14-15 hrs. a day, six days a week,), living in worker dorms, etc., considered 'good' if they can get $20 a day out of it. So they can make basketball shoes that sell for $350 in the US, or a 'smart' phone for $400-$600. A somewhat different subject, but Pakistani 10 yr. olds make all those soccer balls for European and American 10 yr. olds (or 16 yr.olds) to kick around. Conditions like in the US or the UK or most of Europe 100-150 years ago. You also have to understand what "net exports" means. Many Chinese parents have to eat a LOT less for a week to get the kid some shoes; that being the case, it's safe to say that domestic spending is an issue there, but at the same time meaning that Chinese -net- exports are 'supported,' as it were, by that metric as much as by total exports. Where does that "revenue coming into the country" you allude to go? It ain't to the workers, I can tell you that. And that, more than anything, is why China is 'behind.' China is aware of all this (or, at least their wonderful economists are), but there is no issue in a country of 1.3 billion population that can be changed overnight. It be a slow slog, whatever they do.
|
|
|
|