crumpets
Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014 From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley) Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady Nobody I know seeking a serious and committed relationship would do so either. This is a good point, in that men advertise wholly differently than do women, so, looking at only one advertising method (i.e., Craigslist personal ads) does not a valid statistic make. quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady Then you have to factor in how many of these ads are offering professional services, and whether those classifying themselves are dominant in both their professional and in their private lives. I suspect, in Craigslist, that this is not the case - but - I agree that this is entirely the case in most media. Women, in my opinion, are far (far far far) more likely to be able to make money on this type of endeavor over men. So, in MOST advertising media, the women advertising will far outnumber the men. Yet, in PERSONAL (i.e., no money, relationships, or FWB) advertising, the number of men advertising for dominant/submissive relationsihps (used loosely) vastly outweight the women. So, in three ways, I can say that the professional men and women are not represented in my datum: 1. Men can't easily go pro (effectively, none of the men are pros) 2. Women were very low anyway (so, even if they were pros, they were outnumbered even more so by the mean) 3 Pro ads get weeded out of the personals very quickly anyway quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady So the question is not the ratio of submissive males to dominant females, but the ratio of acceptably submissive men to available dominant women. This is a perfectly valid question, and which would be interesting to know. quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamladymore like 20:1 on line Sounds like a reasonable number, to me. I can't think of ANYTHING I've ever done that didn't have at least a 20:1 ratio of men to women in my entire life. I don't know what women do, but it's nothing that I do.
< Message edited by crumpets -- 3/5/2015 11:20:32 AM >
|