RE: m f comparisions (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 1:48:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

So many words, so little time. I never said any of that and it would be the equivalent of a random homeless man on the streets walking up to me and hurling insults. I would just smile and nod, keep him in my line of sight and walk away. I don't need or want your acceptance. I have made this clear on several occasions yet you people continue with threads like this one. Of course this thread was started and continued about a comment I made and yet we pretend it's all light hearted and innocent when people are exchanging emails to each other and gossiping and asking personal questions literally about someone who really doesn't give a shit about them. Uhm, yea. Get a life might be too generic of a phrase for this. More "live and let life, alright matey?"



no what you said was
I must reiterate you don't know me and I feel zero inclination to tout my conquests nor my current. So stop with the "this is generic you" nonsense as if we are actual friends or acquaintances. We both know that will never happen.

You live your life your way, thats fine with me, I believe I actually MENTIONED that...
oh yes, loook
quote:

I havent counted you as a friend or otherwise NOT a friend,you seem to be reading a lot of shit into my comment.

Is there something wrong with your comprehension???
I know there is nothing wrong with mine,

Neither have I asked you a personal question, I dont care enough...because you are merely another female dominant with her own way of doing things,
for someone who doesnt care about anyone, even mentally ill people shouting at her, you seem to be getting more venemous, maybe a nap would help
Im gonna be taking one,.,
Cos yanno Your intimate life, is less interesting to me than the fact that I have a zit on my nose, It doesnt affect anything around me....its NOT my ego
What you post here however is open to debate, criticism, support or whatever people feel you are saying...

Nope the saying is , different strokes for different folks



LOL, Yes, my caring meter is going up, well done.




Lucylastic -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 1:52:12 PM)

i could give a flying fart...
your issue, your problem, not mine....(yawwwwwwn)




GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 1:55:43 PM)

lmao, I had a really amazing day today, so yah, actually it's not. I was busy opening my packages while this was all going on and blah blahing my responses in the interim. I'm keeping this going merely for the LOL factor for onlookers.




Lucylastic -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 1:56:15 PM)

it shows
bad excuse, really




littleladybug -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 1:56:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


I mean it's not like we're comparing femsubs to space lobsters here.


I hope it is only my fucked up mind that is bringing up the B52's song here. (Yeah, I know, rock lobster...space lobster...totally different...but catchy nonetheless *s*)

Seriously, no, I should hope that fem subs are not any "weird species". Though, sometimes, in reading the posts on here and elsewhere, I do wonder about the "general perception".




GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:00:43 PM)

OK, I looked it up, there are a handful of male professional Dominants out there on Google's first page. Most of them cater to male subs. This is definitely not the dumbest debate ever.




littleladybug -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:03:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

OK, I looked it up, there are a handful of male professional Dominants out there on Google's first page. Most of them cater to male subs. This is definitely not the dumbest debate ever.


What does the existence, or not, of professional male dominants have to do with this?






GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:09:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

OK, I looked it up, there are a handful of male professional Dominants out there on Google's first page. Most of them cater to male subs. This is definitely not the dumbest debate ever.


What does the existence, or not, of professional male dominants have to do with this?





Wow really? I know this got off track with you trying to give quizzical cooking tips but remember? It was a comparison of male and female subs and why it's different? Male FinDoms and ProDoms practically non existent is first point and if they are they likely cater to men. If I can allow this argument to get a bit more cerebral and less "neener neener", here is a video about objectification vs subjectification in genders.
http://elitedaily.com/women/sexual-subjectification-vs-objectification-why-we-all-need-to-learn-the-difference-video/




GotSteel -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:19:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
OK, I looked it up, there are a handful of male professional Dominants out there on Google's first page. Most of them cater to male subs. This is definitely not the dumbest debate ever.


We recently had a thread on male pro-doms that serve women around here, anyone remember where it is?

There are ratio differences on a few things, I don't think anyone is contesting that. Also some anatomical differences, but how do we get from there to totally different? It seems to me that there are some non-trivial inferences that you've made from there and not shared with the rest of us.

Why not simply enumerate them? Are they really so bad as to justify wasting 6 pages on snarkuments rather than explaining your reasoning?




JstAnotherSub -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:23:26 PM)

So, some chick rants about people seeing women as sexual objects and then directs you to her video about how to have multiple orgasms, and this relates to the sameness and differences of male and female subs in what way?




Moderator3 -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:23:41 PM)

We have two threads that seem to be hotly debated over similar things and some of you are pushing the limits of snark and gold mail.

Tone it down please and that means each side of the debate. I'm starting to see more horns than halos. [;)]




shiftyw -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:27:09 PM)

I went looking for that thread just now steel... A while ago there was one on paid male subs too.




GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:29:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
We recently had a thread on male pro-doms that serve women around here, anyone remember where it is?

There are ratio differences on a few things, I don't think anyone is contesting that. Also some anatomical differences, but how do we get from there to totally different? It seems to me that there are some non-trivial inferences that you've made from there and not shared with the rest of us.

Why not simply enumerate them? Are they really so bad as to justify wasting 6 pages on snarkuments rather than explaining your reasoning?


You wasted 6 pages on this. I think the fact I'm even bothering to respond a courtesy. The video sums it up, again I used the words "cerebral" and "depth perception". You can bring a horse to water but you can't make him drink. To add, hi, I have been a Domme for all of my adult life. What sex is to most of you DOMINATION PRIMARILY and making boys melted candy in my hands is to me. I don't care about your thoughts or feelings on the matter. I am not going to summarize my entire life based on a snippet I said from personal experience and knowledge of psychology of genders.
If you really are that confused about the difference between men and women go ask a psych professor and get illuminated. [8|]
Oh to add, I don't have to pander, kiss ass or downplay others in order to do it. That alone makes me feel rather "delicious". [;)]




littleladybug -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:33:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

Wow really? I know this got off track with you trying to give quizzical cooking tips but remember? It was a comparison of male and female subs and why it's different? Male FinDoms and ProDoms practically non existent is first point and if they are they likely cater to men. If I can allow this argument to get a bit more cerebral and less "neener neener", here is a video about objectification vs subjectification in genders.
http://elitedaily.com/women/sexual-subjectification-vs-objectification-why-we-all-need-to-learn-the-difference-video/


Yes really.

So, "cerebrally speaking"...what I am seeing here is the idea that male subs are weak and malleable. And that it pisses the fuck out of some self proclaimed female dominants that others are calling them out on it.

And the video, really? Video sexuality expert Laci Green? My freaking GOD. If this is the "be all, end all" of what there is regarding sexuality, I'll happily pass.

No seriously, I will happily never have sex if I never have to hear this "expert" speak again.

Yup, my man didn't have to compete with "Pro Doms". It was a *relatively* simple issue of figuring out what our compatibility was, and going from there. I'm just trying to understand, as much as I can from my POV, what the heck makes the "M/f" relationship something special.








GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:35:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug
Yes really.

So, "cerebrally speaking"...what I am seeing here is the idea that male subs are weak and malleable. And that it pisses the fuck out of some self proclaimed female dominants that others are calling them out on it.

And the video, really? Video sexuality expert Laci Green? My freaking GOD. If this is the "be all, end all" of what there is regarding sexuality, I'll happily pass.

No seriously, I will happily never have sex if I never have to hear this "expert" speak again.

Yup, my man didn't have to compete with "Pro Doms". It was a *relatively* simple issue of figuring out what our compatibility was, and going from there. I'm just trying to understand, as much as I can from my POV, what the heck makes the "M/f" relationship something special.


OK, keep wondering. Hopefully someone watching will point you to the nearest male FinDom thread and you can start there and work your way to an actual epiphany one day. I'm rooting for ya. By the way, since I'm being the Captain Obvious of the day, Laci's words are from actual psychological studies and are not her own independent studies. Though my measuring of the earth's magnetic field and changes in it per annum and how sun spots affect it was my own study. *laughs throatily*
So yea, we're different, aren't we?




littleladybug -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:45:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

OK, keep wondering. Hopefully someone watching will point you to the nearest male FinDom thread and you can start there and work your way to an actual epiphany one day. I'm rooting for ya. By the way, since I'm being the Captain Obvious of the day, Laci's words are from actual psychological studies and are not her own independent studies. Though my measuring of the earth's magnetic field and changes in it per annum and how sun spots affect it was my own study. *laughs throatily*
So yea, we're different, aren't we?


Yup, we are different, and, from what you have said here, I thank all of the powers that be for that fact.

Though, the "laughs thoatily" was cute. It sort of goes with your feeling the need to tell the people of CS that someone told you that the background in your avatar said to him or her that you "liked the finer things", or something of the like. That's just truly adorable. Meaningless in the grand scheme of things, but really, really nice.




GoddessManko -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 2:53:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

OK, keep wondering. Hopefully someone watching will point you to the nearest male FinDom thread and you can start there and work your way to an actual epiphany one day. I'm rooting for ya. By the way, since I'm being the Captain Obvious of the day, Laci's words are from actual psychological studies and are not her own independent studies. Though my measuring of the earth's magnetic field and changes in it per annum and how sun spots affect it was my own study. *laughs throatily*
So yea, we're different, aren't we?


Yup, we are different, and, from what you have said here, I thank all of the powers that be for that fact.

Though, the "laughs thoatily" was cute. It sort of goes with your feeling the need to tell the people of CS that someone told you that the background in your avatar said to him or her that you "liked the finer things", or something of the like. That's just truly adorable. Meaningless in the grand scheme of things, but really, really nice.


No idea. I complimented a lady about the background in HER avatar so they need to get their gossip straight. I would never speak that way about myself though I did post some pictures of travels. I like to photograph other people and things I think are beautiful when I do ergo random selfies to prove I'm not a typing cat. [:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 3:10:50 PM)

I believe this is the post.....http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4790709
in question yes?




littleladybug -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 3:24:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I believe this is the post.....http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4790709
in question yes?



Yes, that was the one I was thinking about.

Whether it was "she said" or "she said", yeah, it says a lot about the person mentioning it.





Lucylastic -> RE: m f comparisions (3/13/2015 3:26:08 PM)

I didnt think it was directed at me.......if it was, i should respond to it.....




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875