LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: losttreasure And this relationship you speak of doesn't even begin to touch it. Although we can choose to -assume- from the OPs post that this is the case, we do not -know- that this relationship does not begin to touch trust, from the dominant individual's perspective. We have no idea what agreements were in place at the beginning of this, nor what the self-professed slave in this situation acceeded to under the terms of her surrender. If she agreed that her Master would be allowed anything he desired, this, to me, would include his own designations in terms of privacy -- that he could keep anything private that he desired, that he could act as he pleased, and that he could do as he wished with his property. If a person wishes to have different parameters in place, it is up to that person to be completely clear about what he or she expects. It is senseless, after the fact, to look at an agreement and say "I don't like this part -- it isn't "fair", and I don't want it." after one has already agreed to it. The proper choice, when one realizes such a thing, is to speak with the other individual(s) involved, and re-negotiate -- or walk away from the situation if it is intolerable. In our household, our servants do not have the right to demand complete transparency from us. We keep things private as we see fit, and the servants either sign or verbally acknowledge their understanding of this when they contract with us. (We are, even with our temporary servants, moving away from ANY verbal contracting, though -- too easy to forget later what one agreed to). Get it spelled out -- talk it through. If the only thing the person wants is complete obedience without question, and a person can't abide by that, this is NOT a workable situation... and it -won't- magically change once a person is in the situation... it will just become a thorn in the footpad, developing its own esoteric "inflammation" and "infection", and will pollute the whole relationship. Some people DO manage to have relationships without full disclosure that are healthy and happy -- and without knowing exactly what this young woman (the OP) agreed to in writing or by action, we have no way of knowing whether this is a deceitful act or just a hasty acceptance of unacceptable terms just to be in a relationship. ZWD
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language. Bladewing Enclave
|